Causal attributions for problematic family interactions: A qualitative, cultural comparison of Western Samoa, American Samoa, and the United States

Kris H. Poasa, Brent Mallinckrodt, Lisa Suzuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A mixed quantitative and qualitative research design compared 23 U.S. college students to 25 students from Western Samoa and 25 from American Samoa, with regard to differences in cultural beliefs and attributions. Survey responses suggested that Samoan students endorsed significantly more vertical, collective and vertical, individualistic cultural attitudes than U.S. students. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses to four vignettes depicting family conflicts suggested cultural differences in patterns of attribution of blame and responsibility for resolving the conflicts. U.S. students emphasized stable, internal, global attributions to character flaws. Samoan students emphasized more easily changed, situation-specific attributions; nonlinear, multifaceted judgments of blame; deference to hierarchy in group relationships; and context-oriented resolutions that avoid individual confrontation and emphasize preservation of relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)32-60
Number of pages29
JournalCounseling Psychologist
Volume28
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Independent State of Samoa
American Samoa
Students
Family Conflict
Qualitative Research
Research Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Causal attributions for problematic family interactions : A qualitative, cultural comparison of Western Samoa, American Samoa, and the United States. / Poasa, Kris H.; Mallinckrodt, Brent; Suzuki, Lisa.

In: Counseling Psychologist, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 32-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4347860502f44ced8b830a7930f7bab0,
title = "Causal attributions for problematic family interactions: A qualitative, cultural comparison of Western Samoa, American Samoa, and the United States",
abstract = "A mixed quantitative and qualitative research design compared 23 U.S. college students to 25 students from Western Samoa and 25 from American Samoa, with regard to differences in cultural beliefs and attributions. Survey responses suggested that Samoan students endorsed significantly more vertical, collective and vertical, individualistic cultural attitudes than U.S. students. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses to four vignettes depicting family conflicts suggested cultural differences in patterns of attribution of blame and responsibility for resolving the conflicts. U.S. students emphasized stable, internal, global attributions to character flaws. Samoan students emphasized more easily changed, situation-specific attributions; nonlinear, multifaceted judgments of blame; deference to hierarchy in group relationships; and context-oriented resolutions that avoid individual confrontation and emphasize preservation of relationships.",
author = "Poasa, {Kris H.} and Brent Mallinckrodt and Lisa Suzuki",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "32--60",
journal = "Counseling Psychologist",
issn = "0011-0000",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causal attributions for problematic family interactions

T2 - A qualitative, cultural comparison of Western Samoa, American Samoa, and the United States

AU - Poasa, Kris H.

AU - Mallinckrodt, Brent

AU - Suzuki, Lisa

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - A mixed quantitative and qualitative research design compared 23 U.S. college students to 25 students from Western Samoa and 25 from American Samoa, with regard to differences in cultural beliefs and attributions. Survey responses suggested that Samoan students endorsed significantly more vertical, collective and vertical, individualistic cultural attitudes than U.S. students. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses to four vignettes depicting family conflicts suggested cultural differences in patterns of attribution of blame and responsibility for resolving the conflicts. U.S. students emphasized stable, internal, global attributions to character flaws. Samoan students emphasized more easily changed, situation-specific attributions; nonlinear, multifaceted judgments of blame; deference to hierarchy in group relationships; and context-oriented resolutions that avoid individual confrontation and emphasize preservation of relationships.

AB - A mixed quantitative and qualitative research design compared 23 U.S. college students to 25 students from Western Samoa and 25 from American Samoa, with regard to differences in cultural beliefs and attributions. Survey responses suggested that Samoan students endorsed significantly more vertical, collective and vertical, individualistic cultural attitudes than U.S. students. Qualitative analysis of narrative responses to four vignettes depicting family conflicts suggested cultural differences in patterns of attribution of blame and responsibility for resolving the conflicts. U.S. students emphasized stable, internal, global attributions to character flaws. Samoan students emphasized more easily changed, situation-specific attributions; nonlinear, multifaceted judgments of blame; deference to hierarchy in group relationships; and context-oriented resolutions that avoid individual confrontation and emphasize preservation of relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034424547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034424547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034424547

VL - 28

SP - 32

EP - 60

JO - Counseling Psychologist

JF - Counseling Psychologist

SN - 0011-0000

IS - 1

ER -