Categorizing partner-violent men within the reactive-proactive typology model

Kenneth A. Chase, K. Daniel O'Leary, Richard E. Heyman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A system for categorizing partner-violent men as either reactive or proactive aggressors was developed and evaluated in the present study. Sixty partner-violent men were reliably categorized, and the distribution (62% reactive, 38% proactive) fell within the expected range. Some construct validity was demonstrated, as several significant predicted group differences were found on factors of theoretical relevance to the typology model (affectivity, personality, and violence in the family-of-origin). Proactively versus reactively categorized participants were (a) more dominant and less angry during a 10-min interpartner interaction, (b) more antisocial and aggressive-sadistic and less dependent, and (c) more frequently classified as psychopathic (17% vs. 0%). Research and clinical implications of the system are discussed, as is the potential overlap between the reactively, and proactively categorized partner-violent men in this study with previously identified types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-572
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Domestic Violence
Personality
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Categorizing partner-violent men within the reactive-proactive typology model. / Chase, Kenneth A.; O'Leary, K. Daniel; Heyman, Richard E.

In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 3, 2001, p. 567-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7dc0d629b00543cd9d5b86688cee298c,
title = "Categorizing partner-violent men within the reactive-proactive typology model",
abstract = "A system for categorizing partner-violent men as either reactive or proactive aggressors was developed and evaluated in the present study. Sixty partner-violent men were reliably categorized, and the distribution (62{\%} reactive, 38{\%} proactive) fell within the expected range. Some construct validity was demonstrated, as several significant predicted group differences were found on factors of theoretical relevance to the typology model (affectivity, personality, and violence in the family-of-origin). Proactively versus reactively categorized participants were (a) more dominant and less angry during a 10-min interpartner interaction, (b) more antisocial and aggressive-sadistic and less dependent, and (c) more frequently classified as psychopathic (17{\%} vs. 0{\%}). Research and clinical implications of the system are discussed, as is the potential overlap between the reactively, and proactively categorized partner-violent men in this study with previously identified types.",
author = "Chase, {Kenneth A.} and O'Leary, {K. Daniel} and Heyman, {Richard E.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1037//0022-006X.69.3.567",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "567--572",
journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Categorizing partner-violent men within the reactive-proactive typology model

AU - Chase, Kenneth A.

AU - O'Leary, K. Daniel

AU - Heyman, Richard E.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - A system for categorizing partner-violent men as either reactive or proactive aggressors was developed and evaluated in the present study. Sixty partner-violent men were reliably categorized, and the distribution (62% reactive, 38% proactive) fell within the expected range. Some construct validity was demonstrated, as several significant predicted group differences were found on factors of theoretical relevance to the typology model (affectivity, personality, and violence in the family-of-origin). Proactively versus reactively categorized participants were (a) more dominant and less angry during a 10-min interpartner interaction, (b) more antisocial and aggressive-sadistic and less dependent, and (c) more frequently classified as psychopathic (17% vs. 0%). Research and clinical implications of the system are discussed, as is the potential overlap between the reactively, and proactively categorized partner-violent men in this study with previously identified types.

AB - A system for categorizing partner-violent men as either reactive or proactive aggressors was developed and evaluated in the present study. Sixty partner-violent men were reliably categorized, and the distribution (62% reactive, 38% proactive) fell within the expected range. Some construct validity was demonstrated, as several significant predicted group differences were found on factors of theoretical relevance to the typology model (affectivity, personality, and violence in the family-of-origin). Proactively versus reactively categorized participants were (a) more dominant and less angry during a 10-min interpartner interaction, (b) more antisocial and aggressive-sadistic and less dependent, and (c) more frequently classified as psychopathic (17% vs. 0%). Research and clinical implications of the system are discussed, as is the potential overlap between the reactively, and proactively categorized partner-violent men in this study with previously identified types.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034913374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034913374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037//0022-006X.69.3.567

DO - 10.1037//0022-006X.69.3.567

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 567

EP - 572

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 3

ER -