Cash, cars, and condoms: Economic factors in disadvantaged adolescent women's condom use

Janet Rosenbaum, Jonathan Zenilman, Eve Rose, Gina Wingood, Ralph DiClemente

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Evaluate whether adolescent women who received economic benefits from their boyfriends were more likely never to use condoms. Data are obtained from a longitudinal HIV prevention intervention study with 715 African American adolescent women in urban Atlanta surveyed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome was never using condoms in the past 14 and 60 days at 6 and 12 months. The primary predictor was having a boyfriend as primary spending money source at baseline. Analysis minimized confounding using propensity weighting to balance respondents on 81 variables. A boyfriend was the primary spending money source for 24% of respondents, who did not differ in neighborhood or family context but had lower education, more abuse history, riskier sex, and more sexually transmitted infections. After propensity score weighting, no statistically significant differences for 81 evaluated covariates remained, including age distributions. Women whose boyfriend was their primary spending money source were 50% more likely never to use condoms at 6 and 12 months and less likely to respond to the intervention at 12 months. Women whose boyfriend had been their primary spending money source but found another spending money source were more likely to start using condoms than women who continued. Women whose boyfriends owned cars were more likely never to use condoms. Receiving spending money from a boyfriend is common among adolescent women in populations targeted by pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention interventions, and may undermine interventions' effectiveness. Clinicians and reproductive health interventions need to address females' economic circumstances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-241
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Condoms
Vulnerable Populations
Economics
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Propensity Score
Age Distribution
Reproductive Health
African Americans
HIV
Education
Pregnancy
Population

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • Economic factors
  • Negotiating
  • Prostitution
  • Safe sex
  • Sexual behavior
  • Sexual partners

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Cash, cars, and condoms : Economic factors in disadvantaged adolescent women's condom use. / Rosenbaum, Janet; Zenilman, Jonathan; Rose, Eve; Wingood, Gina; DiClemente, Ralph.

In: Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.09.2012, p. 233-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenbaum, Janet ; Zenilman, Jonathan ; Rose, Eve ; Wingood, Gina ; DiClemente, Ralph. / Cash, cars, and condoms : Economic factors in disadvantaged adolescent women's condom use. In: Journal of Adolescent Health. 2012 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 233-241.
@article{5609d462ec0741cda8758042c46d0012,
title = "Cash, cars, and condoms: Economic factors in disadvantaged adolescent women's condom use",
abstract = "Evaluate whether adolescent women who received economic benefits from their boyfriends were more likely never to use condoms. Data are obtained from a longitudinal HIV prevention intervention study with 715 African American adolescent women in urban Atlanta surveyed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome was never using condoms in the past 14 and 60 days at 6 and 12 months. The primary predictor was having a boyfriend as primary spending money source at baseline. Analysis minimized confounding using propensity weighting to balance respondents on 81 variables. A boyfriend was the primary spending money source for 24{\%} of respondents, who did not differ in neighborhood or family context but had lower education, more abuse history, riskier sex, and more sexually transmitted infections. After propensity score weighting, no statistically significant differences for 81 evaluated covariates remained, including age distributions. Women whose boyfriend was their primary spending money source were 50{\%} more likely never to use condoms at 6 and 12 months and less likely to respond to the intervention at 12 months. Women whose boyfriend had been their primary spending money source but found another spending money source were more likely to start using condoms than women who continued. Women whose boyfriends owned cars were more likely never to use condoms. Receiving spending money from a boyfriend is common among adolescent women in populations targeted by pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention interventions, and may undermine interventions' effectiveness. Clinicians and reproductive health interventions need to address females' economic circumstances.",
keywords = "adolescent, Economic factors, Negotiating, Prostitution, Safe sex, Sexual behavior, Sexual partners",
author = "Janet Rosenbaum and Jonathan Zenilman and Eve Rose and Gina Wingood and Ralph DiClemente",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "233--241",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",
issn = "1054-139X",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cash, cars, and condoms

T2 - Economic factors in disadvantaged adolescent women's condom use

AU - Rosenbaum, Janet

AU - Zenilman, Jonathan

AU - Rose, Eve

AU - Wingood, Gina

AU - DiClemente, Ralph

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Evaluate whether adolescent women who received economic benefits from their boyfriends were more likely never to use condoms. Data are obtained from a longitudinal HIV prevention intervention study with 715 African American adolescent women in urban Atlanta surveyed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome was never using condoms in the past 14 and 60 days at 6 and 12 months. The primary predictor was having a boyfriend as primary spending money source at baseline. Analysis minimized confounding using propensity weighting to balance respondents on 81 variables. A boyfriend was the primary spending money source for 24% of respondents, who did not differ in neighborhood or family context but had lower education, more abuse history, riskier sex, and more sexually transmitted infections. After propensity score weighting, no statistically significant differences for 81 evaluated covariates remained, including age distributions. Women whose boyfriend was their primary spending money source were 50% more likely never to use condoms at 6 and 12 months and less likely to respond to the intervention at 12 months. Women whose boyfriend had been their primary spending money source but found another spending money source were more likely to start using condoms than women who continued. Women whose boyfriends owned cars were more likely never to use condoms. Receiving spending money from a boyfriend is common among adolescent women in populations targeted by pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention interventions, and may undermine interventions' effectiveness. Clinicians and reproductive health interventions need to address females' economic circumstances.

AB - Evaluate whether adolescent women who received economic benefits from their boyfriends were more likely never to use condoms. Data are obtained from a longitudinal HIV prevention intervention study with 715 African American adolescent women in urban Atlanta surveyed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome was never using condoms in the past 14 and 60 days at 6 and 12 months. The primary predictor was having a boyfriend as primary spending money source at baseline. Analysis minimized confounding using propensity weighting to balance respondents on 81 variables. A boyfriend was the primary spending money source for 24% of respondents, who did not differ in neighborhood or family context but had lower education, more abuse history, riskier sex, and more sexually transmitted infections. After propensity score weighting, no statistically significant differences for 81 evaluated covariates remained, including age distributions. Women whose boyfriend was their primary spending money source were 50% more likely never to use condoms at 6 and 12 months and less likely to respond to the intervention at 12 months. Women whose boyfriend had been their primary spending money source but found another spending money source were more likely to start using condoms than women who continued. Women whose boyfriends owned cars were more likely never to use condoms. Receiving spending money from a boyfriend is common among adolescent women in populations targeted by pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection prevention interventions, and may undermine interventions' effectiveness. Clinicians and reproductive health interventions need to address females' economic circumstances.

KW - adolescent

KW - Economic factors

KW - Negotiating

KW - Prostitution

KW - Safe sex

KW - Sexual behavior

KW - Sexual partners

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865258669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865258669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22921133

AN - SCOPUS:84865258669

VL - 51

SP - 233

EP - 241

JO - Journal of Adolescent Health

JF - Journal of Adolescent Health

SN - 1054-139X

IS - 3

ER -