Case Presentations Demonstrating Periodontal Treatment Variation

PEARL Network

Frederick A. Curro, Ashley C. Grill, Abigail G. Matthews, John Martin, Elisabeth Kalenderian, Ronald Craig, Frederick Naftolin, Van P. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Variation in periodontal terminology can affect the diagnosis and treatment plan as assessed by practicing general dentists in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network. General dentists participating in the PEARL Network are highly screened, credentialed, and qualified and may not be representative of the general population of dentists.

METHODS: Ten randomized case presentations ranging from periodontal health to gingivitis, to mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were randomly presented to respondents. Descriptive comparisons were made between these diagnosis groups in terms of the treatment recommendations following diagnosis.

RESULTS: PEARL practitioners assessing periodontal clinical scenarios were found to either over- or under-diagnose the case presentations, which affected treatment planning, while the remaining responses concurred with respect to the diagnosis. The predominant diagnosis was compared with that assigned by two practicing periodontists. There was variation in treatment based on the diagnosis for gingivitis and the lesser forms of periodontitis.

CONCLUSION: Data suggests that a lack of clarity of periodontal terminology affects both diagnosis and treatment planning, and terminology may be improved by having diagnosis codes, which could be used to assess treatment outcomes.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This article provides data to support best practice for the use of diagnosis coding and integration of dentistry with medicine using ICD-10 terminology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)432-440
Number of pages9
JournalCompendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)
Volume36
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Learning
Research
Dentists
Terminology
Therapeutics
Gingivitis
Periodontitis
International Classification of Diseases
Dentistry
Practice Guidelines
Medicine
Health
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Curro, F. A., Grill, A. C., Matthews, A. G., Martin, J., Kalenderian, E., Craig, R., ... Thompson, V. P. (2015). Case Presentations Demonstrating Periodontal Treatment Variation: PEARL Network. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995), 36(6), 432-440.

Case Presentations Demonstrating Periodontal Treatment Variation : PEARL Network. / Curro, Frederick A.; Grill, Ashley C.; Matthews, Abigail G.; Martin, John; Kalenderian, Elisabeth; Craig, Ronald; Naftolin, Frederick; Thompson, Van P.

In: Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995), Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 432-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curro, FA, Grill, AC, Matthews, AG, Martin, J, Kalenderian, E, Craig, R, Naftolin, F & Thompson, VP 2015, 'Case Presentations Demonstrating Periodontal Treatment Variation: PEARL Network', Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995), vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 432-440.
Curro, Frederick A. ; Grill, Ashley C. ; Matthews, Abigail G. ; Martin, John ; Kalenderian, Elisabeth ; Craig, Ronald ; Naftolin, Frederick ; Thompson, Van P. / Case Presentations Demonstrating Periodontal Treatment Variation : PEARL Network. In: Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). 2015 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 432-440.
@article{7a7722388b1b49ef9aff925657e7dfda,
title = "Case Presentations Demonstrating Periodontal Treatment Variation: PEARL Network",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Variation in periodontal terminology can affect the diagnosis and treatment plan as assessed by practicing general dentists in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network. General dentists participating in the PEARL Network are highly screened, credentialed, and qualified and may not be representative of the general population of dentists.METHODS: Ten randomized case presentations ranging from periodontal health to gingivitis, to mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were randomly presented to respondents. Descriptive comparisons were made between these diagnosis groups in terms of the treatment recommendations following diagnosis.RESULTS: PEARL practitioners assessing periodontal clinical scenarios were found to either over- or under-diagnose the case presentations, which affected treatment planning, while the remaining responses concurred with respect to the diagnosis. The predominant diagnosis was compared with that assigned by two practicing periodontists. There was variation in treatment based on the diagnosis for gingivitis and the lesser forms of periodontitis.CONCLUSION: Data suggests that a lack of clarity of periodontal terminology affects both diagnosis and treatment planning, and terminology may be improved by having diagnosis codes, which could be used to assess treatment outcomes.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This article provides data to support best practice for the use of diagnosis coding and integration of dentistry with medicine using ICD-10 terminology.",
author = "Curro, {Frederick A.} and Grill, {Ashley C.} and Matthews, {Abigail G.} and John Martin and Elisabeth Kalenderian and Ronald Craig and Frederick Naftolin and Thompson, {Van P.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "432--440",
journal = "The Compendium of continuing education in dentistry",
issn = "1548-8578",
publisher = "Dental Learning Systems Co., Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case Presentations Demonstrating Periodontal Treatment Variation

T2 - PEARL Network

AU - Curro, Frederick A.

AU - Grill, Ashley C.

AU - Matthews, Abigail G.

AU - Martin, John

AU - Kalenderian, Elisabeth

AU - Craig, Ronald

AU - Naftolin, Frederick

AU - Thompson, Van P.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Variation in periodontal terminology can affect the diagnosis and treatment plan as assessed by practicing general dentists in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network. General dentists participating in the PEARL Network are highly screened, credentialed, and qualified and may not be representative of the general population of dentists.METHODS: Ten randomized case presentations ranging from periodontal health to gingivitis, to mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were randomly presented to respondents. Descriptive comparisons were made between these diagnosis groups in terms of the treatment recommendations following diagnosis.RESULTS: PEARL practitioners assessing periodontal clinical scenarios were found to either over- or under-diagnose the case presentations, which affected treatment planning, while the remaining responses concurred with respect to the diagnosis. The predominant diagnosis was compared with that assigned by two practicing periodontists. There was variation in treatment based on the diagnosis for gingivitis and the lesser forms of periodontitis.CONCLUSION: Data suggests that a lack of clarity of periodontal terminology affects both diagnosis and treatment planning, and terminology may be improved by having diagnosis codes, which could be used to assess treatment outcomes.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This article provides data to support best practice for the use of diagnosis coding and integration of dentistry with medicine using ICD-10 terminology.

AB - BACKGROUND: Variation in periodontal terminology can affect the diagnosis and treatment plan as assessed by practicing general dentists in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network. General dentists participating in the PEARL Network are highly screened, credentialed, and qualified and may not be representative of the general population of dentists.METHODS: Ten randomized case presentations ranging from periodontal health to gingivitis, to mild, moderate, and severe periodontitis were randomly presented to respondents. Descriptive comparisons were made between these diagnosis groups in terms of the treatment recommendations following diagnosis.RESULTS: PEARL practitioners assessing periodontal clinical scenarios were found to either over- or under-diagnose the case presentations, which affected treatment planning, while the remaining responses concurred with respect to the diagnosis. The predominant diagnosis was compared with that assigned by two practicing periodontists. There was variation in treatment based on the diagnosis for gingivitis and the lesser forms of periodontitis.CONCLUSION: Data suggests that a lack of clarity of periodontal terminology affects both diagnosis and treatment planning, and terminology may be improved by having diagnosis codes, which could be used to assess treatment outcomes.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This article provides data to support best practice for the use of diagnosis coding and integration of dentistry with medicine using ICD-10 terminology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015133528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015133528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 432

EP - 440

JO - The Compendium of continuing education in dentistry

JF - The Compendium of continuing education in dentistry

SN - 1548-8578

IS - 6

ER -