Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery

Rengaraj Venkatesh, Suzanne W. Van Landingham, Ashish M. Khodifad, Aravind Haripriya, Cassandra Lee Thiel, Pradeep Ramulu, Alan L. Robin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose of review This article raises awareness about the cost-effectiveness and carbon footprint of various cataract surgery techniques, comparing their relative carbon emissions and expenses: manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS), phacoemulsification, and femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery. Recent findings As the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide, cataract surgery contributes significantly to global climate change. The carbon footprint of a single phacoemulsification cataract surgery is estimated to be comparable to that of a typical person's life for 1 week. Phacoemulsification has been estimated to be between 1.4 and 4.7 times more expensive than MSICS; however, given the lower degree of postoperative astigmatism and other potential complications, phacoemulsification may still be preferable to MSICS in relatively resource-rich settings requiring high levels of visual function. Limited data are currently available regarding the environmental and financial impact of femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery; however, in its current form, it appears to be the least cost-effective option. Summary Cataract surgery has a high value to patients. The relative environmental impact and cost of different types of cataract surgery should be considered as this treatment becomes even more broadly available globally and as new technologies are developed and implemented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82-88
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Carbon Footprint
Cataract
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Phacoemulsification
Lasers
Costs and Cost Analysis
Astigmatism
Climate Change

Keywords

  • carbon footprint
  • cataract surgery
  • cost-effectiveness
  • manual small-incision cataract surgery
  • value-based medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Venkatesh, R., Van Landingham, S. W., Khodifad, A. M., Haripriya, A., Thiel, C. L., Ramulu, P., & Robin, A. L. (2016). Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 27(1), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000228

Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery. / Venkatesh, Rengaraj; Van Landingham, Suzanne W.; Khodifad, Ashish M.; Haripriya, Aravind; Thiel, Cassandra Lee; Ramulu, Pradeep; Robin, Alan L.

In: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2016, p. 82-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Venkatesh, R, Van Landingham, SW, Khodifad, AM, Haripriya, A, Thiel, CL, Ramulu, P & Robin, AL 2016, 'Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery', Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000228
Venkatesh, Rengaraj ; Van Landingham, Suzanne W. ; Khodifad, Ashish M. ; Haripriya, Aravind ; Thiel, Cassandra Lee ; Ramulu, Pradeep ; Robin, Alan L. / Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery. In: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2016 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 82-88.
@article{f9b3214a8e4c4e638cdcf2ffdd1b3350,
title = "Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery",
abstract = "Purpose of review This article raises awareness about the cost-effectiveness and carbon footprint of various cataract surgery techniques, comparing their relative carbon emissions and expenses: manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS), phacoemulsification, and femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery. Recent findings As the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide, cataract surgery contributes significantly to global climate change. The carbon footprint of a single phacoemulsification cataract surgery is estimated to be comparable to that of a typical person's life for 1 week. Phacoemulsification has been estimated to be between 1.4 and 4.7 times more expensive than MSICS; however, given the lower degree of postoperative astigmatism and other potential complications, phacoemulsification may still be preferable to MSICS in relatively resource-rich settings requiring high levels of visual function. Limited data are currently available regarding the environmental and financial impact of femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery; however, in its current form, it appears to be the least cost-effective option. Summary Cataract surgery has a high value to patients. The relative environmental impact and cost of different types of cataract surgery should be considered as this treatment becomes even more broadly available globally and as new technologies are developed and implemented.",
keywords = "carbon footprint, cataract surgery, cost-effectiveness, manual small-incision cataract surgery, value-based medicine",
author = "Rengaraj Venkatesh and {Van Landingham}, {Suzanne W.} and Khodifad, {Ashish M.} and Aravind Haripriya and Thiel, {Cassandra Lee} and Pradeep Ramulu and Robin, {Alan L.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/ICU.0000000000000228",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "82--88",
journal = "Current Opinion in Ophthalmology",
issn = "1040-8738",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon footprint and cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery

AU - Venkatesh, Rengaraj

AU - Van Landingham, Suzanne W.

AU - Khodifad, Ashish M.

AU - Haripriya, Aravind

AU - Thiel, Cassandra Lee

AU - Ramulu, Pradeep

AU - Robin, Alan L.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose of review This article raises awareness about the cost-effectiveness and carbon footprint of various cataract surgery techniques, comparing their relative carbon emissions and expenses: manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS), phacoemulsification, and femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery. Recent findings As the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide, cataract surgery contributes significantly to global climate change. The carbon footprint of a single phacoemulsification cataract surgery is estimated to be comparable to that of a typical person's life for 1 week. Phacoemulsification has been estimated to be between 1.4 and 4.7 times more expensive than MSICS; however, given the lower degree of postoperative astigmatism and other potential complications, phacoemulsification may still be preferable to MSICS in relatively resource-rich settings requiring high levels of visual function. Limited data are currently available regarding the environmental and financial impact of femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery; however, in its current form, it appears to be the least cost-effective option. Summary Cataract surgery has a high value to patients. The relative environmental impact and cost of different types of cataract surgery should be considered as this treatment becomes even more broadly available globally and as new technologies are developed and implemented.

AB - Purpose of review This article raises awareness about the cost-effectiveness and carbon footprint of various cataract surgery techniques, comparing their relative carbon emissions and expenses: manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS), phacoemulsification, and femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery. Recent findings As the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide, cataract surgery contributes significantly to global climate change. The carbon footprint of a single phacoemulsification cataract surgery is estimated to be comparable to that of a typical person's life for 1 week. Phacoemulsification has been estimated to be between 1.4 and 4.7 times more expensive than MSICS; however, given the lower degree of postoperative astigmatism and other potential complications, phacoemulsification may still be preferable to MSICS in relatively resource-rich settings requiring high levels of visual function. Limited data are currently available regarding the environmental and financial impact of femtosecond laser-Assisted cataract surgery; however, in its current form, it appears to be the least cost-effective option. Summary Cataract surgery has a high value to patients. The relative environmental impact and cost of different types of cataract surgery should be considered as this treatment becomes even more broadly available globally and as new technologies are developed and implemented.

KW - carbon footprint

KW - cataract surgery

KW - cost-effectiveness

KW - manual small-incision cataract surgery

KW - value-based medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952715331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952715331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000228

DO - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000228

M3 - Review article

VL - 27

SP - 82

EP - 88

JO - Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

JF - Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

SN - 1040-8738

IS - 1

ER -