Capturing the value of peer support

measuring recovery-oriented services

Stacey Barrenger, Victoria Stanhope, Emma Miller

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the gap between recovery-oriented processes and clinical outcomes in peer support, an exemplar of recovery-oriented services, and offer suggestions for bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint is a brief review of literature on peer support services and gaps in outcome measurement towards building an evidence base for recovery-oriented services. Findings: Clinical outcomes like hospitalizations or symptoms remain a focus of research, practice and policy in recovery-oriented services and contribute to a mixed evidence base for peer support services, in which recovery-oriented outcomes like empowerment, self-efficacy and hopefulness have more evidentiary support. One approach is to identify the theoretical underpinnings of peer support services and the corresponding change mechanisms in models that would make these recovery-oriented outcomes mediators or process outcomes. A better starting point is to consider which outcomes are valued by the people who use services and develop an evaluation approach according to those stated goals. User driven measurement approaches and more participatory types of research can improve both the quality and impact of health and mental health services. Originality/value: This viewpoint provides a brief review of peer support services and the challenges of outcome measurement in establishing an evidence base and recommends user driven measurement as a starting point in evaluation of recovery-oriented services.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalJournal of Public Mental Health
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    Hope
    Peer Review
    Mental Health Services
    Self Efficacy
    Research
    Hospitalization
    Health
    Power (Psychology)

    Keywords

    • Integrated health
    • Measurement
    • Mental health
    • Peer support
    • Recovery-oriented services

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Cite this

    Capturing the value of peer support : measuring recovery-oriented services. / Barrenger, Stacey; Stanhope, Victoria; Miller, Emma.

    In: Journal of Public Mental Health, 01.01.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Barrenger, Stacey ; Stanhope, Victoria ; Miller, Emma. / Capturing the value of peer support : measuring recovery-oriented services. In: Journal of Public Mental Health. 2019.
    @article{3088d846ed384ef2bb5243b663bc8869,
    title = "Capturing the value of peer support: measuring recovery-oriented services",
    abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the gap between recovery-oriented processes and clinical outcomes in peer support, an exemplar of recovery-oriented services, and offer suggestions for bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint is a brief review of literature on peer support services and gaps in outcome measurement towards building an evidence base for recovery-oriented services. Findings: Clinical outcomes like hospitalizations or symptoms remain a focus of research, practice and policy in recovery-oriented services and contribute to a mixed evidence base for peer support services, in which recovery-oriented outcomes like empowerment, self-efficacy and hopefulness have more evidentiary support. One approach is to identify the theoretical underpinnings of peer support services and the corresponding change mechanisms in models that would make these recovery-oriented outcomes mediators or process outcomes. A better starting point is to consider which outcomes are valued by the people who use services and develop an evaluation approach according to those stated goals. User driven measurement approaches and more participatory types of research can improve both the quality and impact of health and mental health services. Originality/value: This viewpoint provides a brief review of peer support services and the challenges of outcome measurement in establishing an evidence base and recommends user driven measurement as a starting point in evaluation of recovery-oriented services.",
    keywords = "Integrated health, Measurement, Mental health, Peer support, Recovery-oriented services",
    author = "Stacey Barrenger and Victoria Stanhope and Emma Miller",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1108/JPMH-02-2019-0022",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "Journal of Public Mental Health",
    issn = "1746-5729",
    publisher = "Pavilion",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Capturing the value of peer support

    T2 - measuring recovery-oriented services

    AU - Barrenger, Stacey

    AU - Stanhope, Victoria

    AU - Miller, Emma

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the gap between recovery-oriented processes and clinical outcomes in peer support, an exemplar of recovery-oriented services, and offer suggestions for bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint is a brief review of literature on peer support services and gaps in outcome measurement towards building an evidence base for recovery-oriented services. Findings: Clinical outcomes like hospitalizations or symptoms remain a focus of research, practice and policy in recovery-oriented services and contribute to a mixed evidence base for peer support services, in which recovery-oriented outcomes like empowerment, self-efficacy and hopefulness have more evidentiary support. One approach is to identify the theoretical underpinnings of peer support services and the corresponding change mechanisms in models that would make these recovery-oriented outcomes mediators or process outcomes. A better starting point is to consider which outcomes are valued by the people who use services and develop an evaluation approach according to those stated goals. User driven measurement approaches and more participatory types of research can improve both the quality and impact of health and mental health services. Originality/value: This viewpoint provides a brief review of peer support services and the challenges of outcome measurement in establishing an evidence base and recommends user driven measurement as a starting point in evaluation of recovery-oriented services.

    AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the gap between recovery-oriented processes and clinical outcomes in peer support, an exemplar of recovery-oriented services, and offer suggestions for bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach: This viewpoint is a brief review of literature on peer support services and gaps in outcome measurement towards building an evidence base for recovery-oriented services. Findings: Clinical outcomes like hospitalizations or symptoms remain a focus of research, practice and policy in recovery-oriented services and contribute to a mixed evidence base for peer support services, in which recovery-oriented outcomes like empowerment, self-efficacy and hopefulness have more evidentiary support. One approach is to identify the theoretical underpinnings of peer support services and the corresponding change mechanisms in models that would make these recovery-oriented outcomes mediators or process outcomes. A better starting point is to consider which outcomes are valued by the people who use services and develop an evaluation approach according to those stated goals. User driven measurement approaches and more participatory types of research can improve both the quality and impact of health and mental health services. Originality/value: This viewpoint provides a brief review of peer support services and the challenges of outcome measurement in establishing an evidence base and recommends user driven measurement as a starting point in evaluation of recovery-oriented services.

    KW - Integrated health

    KW - Measurement

    KW - Mental health

    KW - Peer support

    KW - Recovery-oriented services

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068254076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068254076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/JPMH-02-2019-0022

    DO - 10.1108/JPMH-02-2019-0022

    M3 - Article

    JO - Journal of Public Mental Health

    JF - Journal of Public Mental Health

    SN - 1746-5729

    ER -