Capacity study for protected-permitted phasing from shared lanes

Elena Prassas, Jin Il Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Protected-permitted phasing from shared-use lanes (i.e., no left-turn bays) exists in certain situations where space and other constraints make this measure expedient in the face of growing traffic demand. An alterative method for handling this special case is proposed as an enhancement to the existing treatment in the 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual. The method proposed is logical and consistent. The more practical issue of whether it is also more accurate is addressed in a series of simulation cases. Simulation was used to provide the reference conditions because of field costs, number of variables to be controlled, and the fact that a well-established model exists. The results show that the existing method systematically overestimates lane group capacity by 10 to 25 percent for this special case, whereas the proposed alternative estimates the lane group capacity by ±10 percent or less.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-268
Number of pages8
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1678
StatePublished - Nov 1999

Fingerprint

Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Capacity study for protected-permitted phasing from shared lanes. / Prassas, Elena; Chang, Jin Il.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1678, 11.1999, p. 261-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0a347f721ff490a8c7a0b2b6aec078e,
title = "Capacity study for protected-permitted phasing from shared lanes",
abstract = "Protected-permitted phasing from shared-use lanes (i.e., no left-turn bays) exists in certain situations where space and other constraints make this measure expedient in the face of growing traffic demand. An alterative method for handling this special case is proposed as an enhancement to the existing treatment in the 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual. The method proposed is logical and consistent. The more practical issue of whether it is also more accurate is addressed in a series of simulation cases. Simulation was used to provide the reference conditions because of field costs, number of variables to be controlled, and the fact that a well-established model exists. The results show that the existing method systematically overestimates lane group capacity by 10 to 25 percent for this special case, whereas the proposed alternative estimates the lane group capacity by ±10 percent or less.",
author = "Elena Prassas and Chang, {Jin Il}",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "261--268",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1678",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capacity study for protected-permitted phasing from shared lanes

AU - Prassas, Elena

AU - Chang, Jin Il

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - Protected-permitted phasing from shared-use lanes (i.e., no left-turn bays) exists in certain situations where space and other constraints make this measure expedient in the face of growing traffic demand. An alterative method for handling this special case is proposed as an enhancement to the existing treatment in the 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual. The method proposed is logical and consistent. The more practical issue of whether it is also more accurate is addressed in a series of simulation cases. Simulation was used to provide the reference conditions because of field costs, number of variables to be controlled, and the fact that a well-established model exists. The results show that the existing method systematically overestimates lane group capacity by 10 to 25 percent for this special case, whereas the proposed alternative estimates the lane group capacity by ±10 percent or less.

AB - Protected-permitted phasing from shared-use lanes (i.e., no left-turn bays) exists in certain situations where space and other constraints make this measure expedient in the face of growing traffic demand. An alterative method for handling this special case is proposed as an enhancement to the existing treatment in the 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual. The method proposed is logical and consistent. The more practical issue of whether it is also more accurate is addressed in a series of simulation cases. Simulation was used to provide the reference conditions because of field costs, number of variables to be controlled, and the fact that a well-established model exists. The results show that the existing method systematically overestimates lane group capacity by 10 to 25 percent for this special case, whereas the proposed alternative estimates the lane group capacity by ±10 percent or less.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033224803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033224803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

SP - 261

EP - 268

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1678

ER -