Can You Answer a Question for Me? Processing Indirect Speech Acts

A. M. Shapiro, Gregory Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two experiments explored how subjects identify the speech acts of utterances. In particular, they compared models in which the direct speech act is derived first, and two "parallel" models in which direct and indirect meanings are on equal footing. Subjects in Experiment I were given questions that were plausible or implausible in their direct and indirect meanings, and were asked to judge whether each item had a plausible direct meaning. The presence of a plausible indirect meaning slowed decision time, showing that indirect meaning could not be ignored and was derived no later than direct meaning. Subjects in Experiment 2 were given the same four question types within a story and were asked to answer them as if they were the person being asked. Response times were equivalent for sentences that had one plausible meaning (direct or indirect) or both direct and indirect meanings. The results were taken as evidence for a model of speech act processing in which a single plausible interpretation is derived for each sentence, regardless of whether it is direct or indirect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-229
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1993

Fingerprint

Speech processing
speech act
Experiments
Reaction Time
experiment
Speech Acts
Indirect Speech
interpretation
human being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Can You Answer a Question for Me? Processing Indirect Speech Acts. / Shapiro, A. M.; Murphy, Gregory.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 32, No. 2, 04.1993, p. 211-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shapiro, A. M. ; Murphy, Gregory. / Can You Answer a Question for Me? Processing Indirect Speech Acts. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 1993 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 211-229.
@article{38855757e5204046a453164ce2f72bae,
title = "Can You Answer a Question for Me? Processing Indirect Speech Acts",
abstract = "Two experiments explored how subjects identify the speech acts of utterances. In particular, they compared models in which the direct speech act is derived first, and two {"}parallel{"} models in which direct and indirect meanings are on equal footing. Subjects in Experiment I were given questions that were plausible or implausible in their direct and indirect meanings, and were asked to judge whether each item had a plausible direct meaning. The presence of a plausible indirect meaning slowed decision time, showing that indirect meaning could not be ignored and was derived no later than direct meaning. Subjects in Experiment 2 were given the same four question types within a story and were asked to answer them as if they were the person being asked. Response times were equivalent for sentences that had one plausible meaning (direct or indirect) or both direct and indirect meanings. The results were taken as evidence for a model of speech act processing in which a single plausible interpretation is derived for each sentence, regardless of whether it is direct or indirect.",
author = "Shapiro, {A. M.} and Gregory Murphy",
year = "1993",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1006/jmla.1993.1012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "211--229",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can You Answer a Question for Me? Processing Indirect Speech Acts

AU - Shapiro, A. M.

AU - Murphy, Gregory

PY - 1993/4

Y1 - 1993/4

N2 - Two experiments explored how subjects identify the speech acts of utterances. In particular, they compared models in which the direct speech act is derived first, and two "parallel" models in which direct and indirect meanings are on equal footing. Subjects in Experiment I were given questions that were plausible or implausible in their direct and indirect meanings, and were asked to judge whether each item had a plausible direct meaning. The presence of a plausible indirect meaning slowed decision time, showing that indirect meaning could not be ignored and was derived no later than direct meaning. Subjects in Experiment 2 were given the same four question types within a story and were asked to answer them as if they were the person being asked. Response times were equivalent for sentences that had one plausible meaning (direct or indirect) or both direct and indirect meanings. The results were taken as evidence for a model of speech act processing in which a single plausible interpretation is derived for each sentence, regardless of whether it is direct or indirect.

AB - Two experiments explored how subjects identify the speech acts of utterances. In particular, they compared models in which the direct speech act is derived first, and two "parallel" models in which direct and indirect meanings are on equal footing. Subjects in Experiment I were given questions that were plausible or implausible in their direct and indirect meanings, and were asked to judge whether each item had a plausible direct meaning. The presence of a plausible indirect meaning slowed decision time, showing that indirect meaning could not be ignored and was derived no later than direct meaning. Subjects in Experiment 2 were given the same four question types within a story and were asked to answer them as if they were the person being asked. Response times were equivalent for sentences that had one plausible meaning (direct or indirect) or both direct and indirect meanings. The results were taken as evidence for a model of speech act processing in which a single plausible interpretation is derived for each sentence, regardless of whether it is direct or indirect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039816332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039816332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jmla.1993.1012

DO - 10.1006/jmla.1993.1012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0039816332

VL - 32

SP - 211

EP - 229

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 2

ER -