Can we attend to large and small at the same time?

Bart Farell, Denis Pelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Evidence from several sources suggests that visual attention is tuned to stimulus scale. This tuning impairs performance when the observer must attend to more than one scale at a time. In experiments originally designed to measure the bandwidth of attention to stimulus scale, we have found tasks in which observers show no attentional tuning for scale. In separate blocks, observers located or identified targets in arrays of elements, either numbers in arrays of letters or static squares in arrays of flashing squares. Each display contained two arrays, either of the same scale or of different scales. The accuracy of locating the target element was lower in mixed-scale than in single-scale displays, but the accuracy of identifying the target was unaffected by a mixing of scales within the same display. This holds for both high-level discriminations-numbers vs letters-and low-level discriminations-static vs flashing. Thus, at least for identifying, one can attend to large and small at the same time. The difference in bandwidth between "what" and "where" implies that stimulus identification is not dependent on prior localization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalVision Research
Volume33
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Channels
  • Locating
  • Size scaling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Can we attend to large and small at the same time? / Farell, Bart; Pelli, Denis.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 33, No. 18, 1993.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0353848a58d4235b7120acd807bb863,
title = "Can we attend to large and small at the same time?",
abstract = "Evidence from several sources suggests that visual attention is tuned to stimulus scale. This tuning impairs performance when the observer must attend to more than one scale at a time. In experiments originally designed to measure the bandwidth of attention to stimulus scale, we have found tasks in which observers show no attentional tuning for scale. In separate blocks, observers located or identified targets in arrays of elements, either numbers in arrays of letters or static squares in arrays of flashing squares. Each display contained two arrays, either of the same scale or of different scales. The accuracy of locating the target element was lower in mixed-scale than in single-scale displays, but the accuracy of identifying the target was unaffected by a mixing of scales within the same display. This holds for both high-level discriminations-numbers vs letters-and low-level discriminations-static vs flashing. Thus, at least for identifying, one can attend to large and small at the same time. The difference in bandwidth between {"}what{"} and {"}where{"} implies that stimulus identification is not dependent on prior localization.",
keywords = "Attention, Channels, Locating, Size scaling",
author = "Bart Farell and Denis Pelli",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(93)90234-N",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we attend to large and small at the same time?

AU - Farell, Bart

AU - Pelli, Denis

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Evidence from several sources suggests that visual attention is tuned to stimulus scale. This tuning impairs performance when the observer must attend to more than one scale at a time. In experiments originally designed to measure the bandwidth of attention to stimulus scale, we have found tasks in which observers show no attentional tuning for scale. In separate blocks, observers located or identified targets in arrays of elements, either numbers in arrays of letters or static squares in arrays of flashing squares. Each display contained two arrays, either of the same scale or of different scales. The accuracy of locating the target element was lower in mixed-scale than in single-scale displays, but the accuracy of identifying the target was unaffected by a mixing of scales within the same display. This holds for both high-level discriminations-numbers vs letters-and low-level discriminations-static vs flashing. Thus, at least for identifying, one can attend to large and small at the same time. The difference in bandwidth between "what" and "where" implies that stimulus identification is not dependent on prior localization.

AB - Evidence from several sources suggests that visual attention is tuned to stimulus scale. This tuning impairs performance when the observer must attend to more than one scale at a time. In experiments originally designed to measure the bandwidth of attention to stimulus scale, we have found tasks in which observers show no attentional tuning for scale. In separate blocks, observers located or identified targets in arrays of elements, either numbers in arrays of letters or static squares in arrays of flashing squares. Each display contained two arrays, either of the same scale or of different scales. The accuracy of locating the target element was lower in mixed-scale than in single-scale displays, but the accuracy of identifying the target was unaffected by a mixing of scales within the same display. This holds for both high-level discriminations-numbers vs letters-and low-level discriminations-static vs flashing. Thus, at least for identifying, one can attend to large and small at the same time. The difference in bandwidth between "what" and "where" implies that stimulus identification is not dependent on prior localization.

KW - Attention

KW - Channels

KW - Locating

KW - Size scaling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027490742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027490742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90234-N

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90234-N

M3 - Article

C2 - 8296471

AN - SCOPUS:0027490742

VL - 33

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 18

ER -