Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot

Ryan D. Enos, Aaron Kaufman, Melissa L. Sands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Violent protests are dramatic political events, yet we know little about the effect of these events on political behavior. While scholars typically treat violent protests as deliberate acts undertaken in pursuit of specific goals, due to a lack of appropriate data and difficulty in causal identification, there is scant evidence of whether riots can actually increase support for these goals. Using geocoded data, we analyze measures of policy support before and after the 1992 Los Angeles riot - one of the most high-profile events of political violence in recent American history - that occurred just prior to an election. Contrary to some expectations from the academic literature and the popular press, we find that the riot caused a marked liberal shift in policy support at the polls. Investigating the sources of this shift, we find that it was likely the result of increased mobilization of both African American and white voters. Remarkably, this mobilization endures over a decade later.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

protest
mobilization
event
evidence
popular press
political behavior
political violence
election
lack
history
American
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot. / Enos, Ryan D.; Kaufman, Aaron; Sands, Melissa L.

In: American Political Science Review, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cb8469680a946989a5b4005872ac68d,
title = "Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot",
abstract = "Violent protests are dramatic political events, yet we know little about the effect of these events on political behavior. While scholars typically treat violent protests as deliberate acts undertaken in pursuit of specific goals, due to a lack of appropriate data and difficulty in causal identification, there is scant evidence of whether riots can actually increase support for these goals. Using geocoded data, we analyze measures of policy support before and after the 1992 Los Angeles riot - one of the most high-profile events of political violence in recent American history - that occurred just prior to an election. Contrary to some expectations from the academic literature and the popular press, we find that the riot caused a marked liberal shift in policy support at the polls. Investigating the sources of this shift, we find that it was likely the result of increased mobilization of both African American and white voters. Remarkably, this mobilization endures over a decade later.",
author = "Enos, {Ryan D.} and Aaron Kaufman and Sands, {Melissa L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0003055419000340",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot

AU - Enos, Ryan D.

AU - Kaufman, Aaron

AU - Sands, Melissa L.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Violent protests are dramatic political events, yet we know little about the effect of these events on political behavior. While scholars typically treat violent protests as deliberate acts undertaken in pursuit of specific goals, due to a lack of appropriate data and difficulty in causal identification, there is scant evidence of whether riots can actually increase support for these goals. Using geocoded data, we analyze measures of policy support before and after the 1992 Los Angeles riot - one of the most high-profile events of political violence in recent American history - that occurred just prior to an election. Contrary to some expectations from the academic literature and the popular press, we find that the riot caused a marked liberal shift in policy support at the polls. Investigating the sources of this shift, we find that it was likely the result of increased mobilization of both African American and white voters. Remarkably, this mobilization endures over a decade later.

AB - Violent protests are dramatic political events, yet we know little about the effect of these events on political behavior. While scholars typically treat violent protests as deliberate acts undertaken in pursuit of specific goals, due to a lack of appropriate data and difficulty in causal identification, there is scant evidence of whether riots can actually increase support for these goals. Using geocoded data, we analyze measures of policy support before and after the 1992 Los Angeles riot - one of the most high-profile events of political violence in recent American history - that occurred just prior to an election. Contrary to some expectations from the academic literature and the popular press, we find that the riot caused a marked liberal shift in policy support at the polls. Investigating the sources of this shift, we find that it was likely the result of increased mobilization of both African American and white voters. Remarkably, this mobilization endures over a decade later.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067344712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067344712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0003055419000340

DO - 10.1017/S0003055419000340

M3 - Article

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

ER -