Can a Non-Cognitive Learning Companion Increase the Effectiveness of a Meta-Cognitive Learning Strategy?

Kurt Vanlehn, Lishan Zhang, Winslow Burleson, Sylvie Girard, Yoalli Hidago-Pontet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This project aimed to improve students' learning and task performance using a non-cognitive learning companion in the context of both a tutor and a meta-tutor. The tutor taught students how to construct models of dynamic systems and the meta-tutor taught students a learning strategy. The non-cognitive learning companion was designed to increase students' effort and persistence in using the learning strategy. It decided when to intervene and what to say using both log data and affective state monitoring via a facial expression camera and a posture sensor. Experiments with high school students showed that the non-cognitive learning companion increased students' learning and performance. However, it had no effect on performance during a transfer phase in which the learning companion, meta-tutor, and tutor were all absent. The transfer phase null effect must be interpreted with caution due to low power, a possible floor effect, and other issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7523430
Pages (from-to)277-289
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

cognitive learning
learning strategy
tutor
Students
learning
student
performance
say
facial expression
persistence
Dynamical systems
Cameras
monitoring
Monitoring
experiment
Sensors
school

Keywords

  • affective computing
  • gaming the system
  • intelligent tutoring systems
  • learning companion
  • Meta-tutor
  • model construction
  • modelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Can a Non-Cognitive Learning Companion Increase the Effectiveness of a Meta-Cognitive Learning Strategy? / Vanlehn, Kurt; Zhang, Lishan; Burleson, Winslow; Girard, Sylvie; Hidago-Pontet, Yoalli.

In: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, Vol. 10, No. 3, 7523430, 01.07.2017, p. 277-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vanlehn, Kurt ; Zhang, Lishan ; Burleson, Winslow ; Girard, Sylvie ; Hidago-Pontet, Yoalli. / Can a Non-Cognitive Learning Companion Increase the Effectiveness of a Meta-Cognitive Learning Strategy?. In: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 277-289.
@article{c632b9abdf4b4b608a47f177560b8628,
title = "Can a Non-Cognitive Learning Companion Increase the Effectiveness of a Meta-Cognitive Learning Strategy?",
abstract = "This project aimed to improve students' learning and task performance using a non-cognitive learning companion in the context of both a tutor and a meta-tutor. The tutor taught students how to construct models of dynamic systems and the meta-tutor taught students a learning strategy. The non-cognitive learning companion was designed to increase students' effort and persistence in using the learning strategy. It decided when to intervene and what to say using both log data and affective state monitoring via a facial expression camera and a posture sensor. Experiments with high school students showed that the non-cognitive learning companion increased students' learning and performance. However, it had no effect on performance during a transfer phase in which the learning companion, meta-tutor, and tutor were all absent. The transfer phase null effect must be interpreted with caution due to low power, a possible floor effect, and other issues.",
keywords = "affective computing, gaming the system, intelligent tutoring systems, learning companion, Meta-tutor, model construction, modelling",
author = "Kurt Vanlehn and Lishan Zhang and Winslow Burleson and Sylvie Girard and Yoalli Hidago-Pontet",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TLT.2016.2594775",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "277--289",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies",
issn = "1939-1382",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can a Non-Cognitive Learning Companion Increase the Effectiveness of a Meta-Cognitive Learning Strategy?

AU - Vanlehn, Kurt

AU - Zhang, Lishan

AU - Burleson, Winslow

AU - Girard, Sylvie

AU - Hidago-Pontet, Yoalli

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - This project aimed to improve students' learning and task performance using a non-cognitive learning companion in the context of both a tutor and a meta-tutor. The tutor taught students how to construct models of dynamic systems and the meta-tutor taught students a learning strategy. The non-cognitive learning companion was designed to increase students' effort and persistence in using the learning strategy. It decided when to intervene and what to say using both log data and affective state monitoring via a facial expression camera and a posture sensor. Experiments with high school students showed that the non-cognitive learning companion increased students' learning and performance. However, it had no effect on performance during a transfer phase in which the learning companion, meta-tutor, and tutor were all absent. The transfer phase null effect must be interpreted with caution due to low power, a possible floor effect, and other issues.

AB - This project aimed to improve students' learning and task performance using a non-cognitive learning companion in the context of both a tutor and a meta-tutor. The tutor taught students how to construct models of dynamic systems and the meta-tutor taught students a learning strategy. The non-cognitive learning companion was designed to increase students' effort and persistence in using the learning strategy. It decided when to intervene and what to say using both log data and affective state monitoring via a facial expression camera and a posture sensor. Experiments with high school students showed that the non-cognitive learning companion increased students' learning and performance. However, it had no effect on performance during a transfer phase in which the learning companion, meta-tutor, and tutor were all absent. The transfer phase null effect must be interpreted with caution due to low power, a possible floor effect, and other issues.

KW - affective computing

KW - gaming the system

KW - intelligent tutoring systems

KW - learning companion

KW - Meta-tutor

KW - model construction

KW - modelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030538896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030538896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TLT.2016.2594775

DO - 10.1109/TLT.2016.2594775

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85030538896

VL - 10

SP - 277

EP - 289

JO - IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

JF - IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

SN - 1939-1382

IS - 3

M1 - 7523430

ER -