Busting the Boom�Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon

Jill Caviglia-Harris, Erin Sills, Andrew Bell, Daniel Harris, Katrina Mullan, Dar Roberts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom�bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This �coupling hypothesis� asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the �decoupling hypothesis� asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom�bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)26-29
    Number of pages4
    JournalNew Scientist
    Volume171
    Issue number2304
    StatePublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    deforestation
    welfare economics
    panel data
    ecosystem service
    tropical forest
    occupation
    timber
    census
    economic development
    environmental factor
    natural resource
    resource
    soil
    socioeconomics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General

    Cite this

    Caviglia-Harris, J., Sills, E., Bell, A., Harris, D., Mullan, K., & Roberts, D. (2001). Busting the Boom�Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. New Scientist, 171(2304), 26-29.

    Busting the Boom�Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. / Caviglia-Harris, Jill; Sills, Erin; Bell, Andrew; Harris, Daniel; Mullan, Katrina; Roberts, Dar.

    In: New Scientist, Vol. 171, No. 2304, 2001, p. 26-29.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Caviglia-Harris, J, Sills, E, Bell, A, Harris, D, Mullan, K & Roberts, D 2001, 'Busting the Boom�Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon', New Scientist, vol. 171, no. 2304, pp. 26-29.
    Caviglia-Harris J, Sills E, Bell A, Harris D, Mullan K, Roberts D. Busting the Boom�Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. New Scientist. 2001;171(2304):26-29.
    Caviglia-Harris, Jill ; Sills, Erin ; Bell, Andrew ; Harris, Daniel ; Mullan, Katrina ; Roberts, Dar. / Busting the Boom�Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. In: New Scientist. 2001 ; Vol. 171, No. 2304. pp. 26-29.
    @article{1908c9eb339040b5af6eb763b2bdfc00,
    title = "Busting the Boom�Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon",
    abstract = "Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom�bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This �coupling hypothesis� asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the �decoupling hypothesis� asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom�bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.",
    author = "Jill Caviglia-Harris and Erin Sills and Andrew Bell and Daniel Harris and Katrina Mullan and Dar Roberts",
    year = "2001",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "171",
    pages = "26--29",
    journal = "New Scientist",
    issn = "0262-4079",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "2304",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Busting the Boom�Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon

    AU - Caviglia-Harris, Jill

    AU - Sills, Erin

    AU - Bell, Andrew

    AU - Harris, Daniel

    AU - Mullan, Katrina

    AU - Roberts, Dar

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom�bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This �coupling hypothesis� asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the �decoupling hypothesis� asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom�bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.

    AB - Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom�bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This �coupling hypothesis� asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the �decoupling hypothesis� asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom�bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015112293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015112293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 171

    SP - 26

    EP - 29

    JO - New Scientist

    JF - New Scientist

    SN - 0262-4079

    IS - 2304

    ER -