Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon

Jill Caviglia-Harris, Erin Sills, Andrew Bell, Daniel Harris, Katrina Mullan, Dar Roberts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom-bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This "coupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the "decoupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom-bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)82-96
    Number of pages15
    JournalWorld Development
    Volume79
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    deforestation
    welfare
    exploitation
    Amazon region
    welfare economics
    need development
    regularity
    wisdom
    inhabitant
    environmental factors
    municipality
    natural resources
    census
    panel data
    ecosystem service
    resources
    tropical forest
    occupation
    economics
    Brazilian Amazon

    Keywords

    • Amazon
    • Boom-bust
    • Catch-up effect
    • Convergence
    • Deforestation
    • Solow growth model

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Development
    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Caviglia-Harris, J., Sills, E., Bell, A., Harris, D., Mullan, K., & Roberts, D. (2016). Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, 79, 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.040

    Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. / Caviglia-Harris, Jill; Sills, Erin; Bell, Andrew; Harris, Daniel; Mullan, Katrina; Roberts, Dar.

    In: World Development, Vol. 79, 01.03.2016, p. 82-96.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Caviglia-Harris, J, Sills, E, Bell, A, Harris, D, Mullan, K & Roberts, D 2016, 'Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon', World Development, vol. 79, pp. 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.040
    Caviglia-Harris J, Sills E, Bell A, Harris D, Mullan K, Roberts D. Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development. 2016 Mar 1;79:82-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.040
    Caviglia-Harris, Jill ; Sills, Erin ; Bell, Andrew ; Harris, Daniel ; Mullan, Katrina ; Roberts, Dar. / Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. In: World Development. 2016 ; Vol. 79. pp. 82-96.
    @article{32c4e8f8196c4870a10704211d62ca1f,
    title = "Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon",
    abstract = "Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom-bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This {"}coupling hypothesis{"} asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the {"}decoupling hypothesis{"} asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom-bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.",
    keywords = "Amazon, Boom-bust, Catch-up effect, Convergence, Deforestation, Solow growth model",
    author = "Jill Caviglia-Harris and Erin Sills and Andrew Bell and Daniel Harris and Katrina Mullan and Dar Roberts",
    year = "2016",
    month = "3",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.040",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "79",
    pages = "82--96",
    journal = "World Development",
    issn = "1873-5991",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon

    AU - Caviglia-Harris, Jill

    AU - Sills, Erin

    AU - Bell, Andrew

    AU - Harris, Daniel

    AU - Mullan, Katrina

    AU - Roberts, Dar

    PY - 2016/3/1

    Y1 - 2016/3/1

    N2 - Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom-bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This "coupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the "decoupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom-bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.

    AB - Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom-bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This "coupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the "decoupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom-bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.

    KW - Amazon

    KW - Boom-bust

    KW - Catch-up effect

    KW - Convergence

    KW - Deforestation

    KW - Solow growth model

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949496296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949496296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.040

    DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.040

    M3 - Article

    VL - 79

    SP - 82

    EP - 96

    JO - World Development

    JF - World Development

    SN - 1873-5991

    ER -