Abstract
Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom-bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This "coupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the "decoupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom-bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 82-96 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | World Development |
| Volume | 79 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2016 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Amazon
- Boom-bust
- Catch-up effect
- Convergence
- Deforestation
- Solow growth model
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
- Development
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Sociology and Political Science
Cite this
Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. / Caviglia-Harris, Jill; Sills, Erin; Bell, Andrew; Harris, Daniel; Mullan, Katrina; Roberts, Dar.
In: World Development, Vol. 79, 01.03.2016, p. 82-96.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Busting the Boom-Bust Pattern of Development in the Brazilian Amazon
AU - Caviglia-Harris, Jill
AU - Sills, Erin
AU - Bell, Andrew
AU - Harris, Daniel
AU - Mullan, Katrina
AU - Roberts, Dar
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom-bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This "coupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the "decoupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom-bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.
AB - Global ecosystem services are clearly threatened by deforestation associated with human occupation and economic development of the Brazilian Amazon. However, the prognosis for the socioeconomic wellbeing of inhabitants remains unclear. In an empirical regularity that has been termed the boom-bust pattern or the resource curse, the exploitation of natural resources is associated with short-run gains in welfare that dissipate over time. This "coupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development are correlated such that deforestation leads to only short-term advances in economic welfare that are not sustained once natural forests (along with their mature timber and soil inputs) are exhausted. In contrast, the "decoupling hypothesis" asserts that deforestation and development need not be correlated over time. In this context, growth that is initially based on deforestation may be sustained and translated into prolonged welfare gains, even once the forest is exhausted. Using census and deforestation data from 1991, 2000 and 2010 for municipalities (i.e., counties) in the Amazon region we confirm that this boom-bust pattern appears in cross-sectional data. However, using panel data we show that socioeconomic welfare has become decoupled from environmental factors and is converging to rising national averages. Our findings contradict the conventional wisdom that the exploitation of tropical forests is required to promote Amazonian development.
KW - Amazon
KW - Boom-bust
KW - Catch-up effect
KW - Convergence
KW - Deforestation
KW - Solow growth model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949496296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949496296&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.040
DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.040
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84949496296
VL - 79
SP - 82
EP - 96
JO - World Development
JF - World Development
SN - 1873-5991
ER -