Bureaucratic rationality and the developmental state

Vivek Chibber

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    There has been a resuscitation of the view that the state can play an important role in the industrialization process. But, for states to be successful in fostering development, they need a considerable degree of internal cohesiveness, which is generally supplied by the presence of a robust, Weberian bureaucratic corps. This article argues that, while internal cohesiveness is indeed critical, bureaucratic rule following can produce results in the opposite direction, depending on the interagency relations that obtain within the state. The effect of interagency relations is demonstrated through an examination of India and Korea. Both have worked to foster industrialization, and both are endowed with relatively healthy bureaucracies. However, the Indian state was paralyzed and fragmented, while its Korean counterpart did secure the requisite internal coherence. Not only did the culture of rule following fail to generate a cohesive state in India, but it, in fact, worked against such an outcome.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)951-989
    Number of pages39
    JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
    Volume107
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2002

    Fingerprint

    industrialization
    rationality
    India
    need development
    bureaucracy
    Korea
    examination
    coherence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Bureaucratic rationality and the developmental state. / Chibber, Vivek.

    In: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 107, No. 4, 01.2002, p. 951-989.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Chibber, Vivek. / Bureaucratic rationality and the developmental state. In: American Journal of Sociology. 2002 ; Vol. 107, No. 4. pp. 951-989.
    @article{d4180858356341f8a54f42b6f5164be2,
    title = "Bureaucratic rationality and the developmental state",
    abstract = "There has been a resuscitation of the view that the state can play an important role in the industrialization process. But, for states to be successful in fostering development, they need a considerable degree of internal cohesiveness, which is generally supplied by the presence of a robust, Weberian bureaucratic corps. This article argues that, while internal cohesiveness is indeed critical, bureaucratic rule following can produce results in the opposite direction, depending on the interagency relations that obtain within the state. The effect of interagency relations is demonstrated through an examination of India and Korea. Both have worked to foster industrialization, and both are endowed with relatively healthy bureaucracies. However, the Indian state was paralyzed and fragmented, while its Korean counterpart did secure the requisite internal coherence. Not only did the culture of rule following fail to generate a cohesive state in India, but it, in fact, worked against such an outcome.",
    author = "Vivek Chibber",
    year = "2002",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1086/341010",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "107",
    pages = "951--989",
    journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
    issn = "0002-9602",
    publisher = "University of Chicago",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Bureaucratic rationality and the developmental state

    AU - Chibber, Vivek

    PY - 2002/1

    Y1 - 2002/1

    N2 - There has been a resuscitation of the view that the state can play an important role in the industrialization process. But, for states to be successful in fostering development, they need a considerable degree of internal cohesiveness, which is generally supplied by the presence of a robust, Weberian bureaucratic corps. This article argues that, while internal cohesiveness is indeed critical, bureaucratic rule following can produce results in the opposite direction, depending on the interagency relations that obtain within the state. The effect of interagency relations is demonstrated through an examination of India and Korea. Both have worked to foster industrialization, and both are endowed with relatively healthy bureaucracies. However, the Indian state was paralyzed and fragmented, while its Korean counterpart did secure the requisite internal coherence. Not only did the culture of rule following fail to generate a cohesive state in India, but it, in fact, worked against such an outcome.

    AB - There has been a resuscitation of the view that the state can play an important role in the industrialization process. But, for states to be successful in fostering development, they need a considerable degree of internal cohesiveness, which is generally supplied by the presence of a robust, Weberian bureaucratic corps. This article argues that, while internal cohesiveness is indeed critical, bureaucratic rule following can produce results in the opposite direction, depending on the interagency relations that obtain within the state. The effect of interagency relations is demonstrated through an examination of India and Korea. Both have worked to foster industrialization, and both are endowed with relatively healthy bureaucracies. However, the Indian state was paralyzed and fragmented, while its Korean counterpart did secure the requisite internal coherence. Not only did the culture of rule following fail to generate a cohesive state in India, but it, in fact, worked against such an outcome.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042334682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042334682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1086/341010

    DO - 10.1086/341010

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 107

    SP - 951

    EP - 989

    JO - American Journal of Sociology

    JF - American Journal of Sociology

    SN - 0002-9602

    IS - 4

    ER -