Building reuse assessment for sustainable urban reconstruction

Debra Laefer, Jonathan P. Manke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Building reuse is a linchpin to managing solid waste. Despite the various benefits beyond contributing to sustainability that can be realized through building reuse, including direct and indirect cost savings, truncated construction schedules, and reduced site disruptions, little formal consideration has been given to this topic, which places professional engineers at a disadvantage when considering this as a design option. As each building project has its own specific requirements, reuse is not always the most economical solution, but, in cases where reuse is in part motivated by other factors such as heritage protection, substantial economic and environmental savings can be realized in tandem. Based on nearly two decades of professional experience, a generalized assessment method for reuse is proposed to facilitate benefit maximization. Applying this 10-step method, the costs related to building replacement and sustainable reuse are compared using two case histories and a theoretical building. A clear correlation is shown with the potential for savings as a function of project size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-227
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume134
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Solid wastes
Costs
Sustainable development
Engineers
Economics
Reuse
Savings

Keywords

  • Demolition
  • Pile foundations
  • Reconstruction
  • Rehabilitation
  • Renovation
  • Sustainable development
  • Urban areas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Building reuse assessment for sustainable urban reconstruction. / Laefer, Debra; Manke, Jonathan P.

In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 3, 2008, p. 217-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f3ef760ecc994a75aae7e70f3d110d9f,
title = "Building reuse assessment for sustainable urban reconstruction",
abstract = "Building reuse is a linchpin to managing solid waste. Despite the various benefits beyond contributing to sustainability that can be realized through building reuse, including direct and indirect cost savings, truncated construction schedules, and reduced site disruptions, little formal consideration has been given to this topic, which places professional engineers at a disadvantage when considering this as a design option. As each building project has its own specific requirements, reuse is not always the most economical solution, but, in cases where reuse is in part motivated by other factors such as heritage protection, substantial economic and environmental savings can be realized in tandem. Based on nearly two decades of professional experience, a generalized assessment method for reuse is proposed to facilitate benefit maximization. Applying this 10-step method, the costs related to building replacement and sustainable reuse are compared using two case histories and a theoretical building. A clear correlation is shown with the potential for savings as a function of project size.",
keywords = "Demolition, Pile foundations, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, Renovation, Sustainable development, Urban areas",
author = "Debra Laefer and Manke, {Jonathan P.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(217)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "217--227",
journal = "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9364",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building reuse assessment for sustainable urban reconstruction

AU - Laefer, Debra

AU - Manke, Jonathan P.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Building reuse is a linchpin to managing solid waste. Despite the various benefits beyond contributing to sustainability that can be realized through building reuse, including direct and indirect cost savings, truncated construction schedules, and reduced site disruptions, little formal consideration has been given to this topic, which places professional engineers at a disadvantage when considering this as a design option. As each building project has its own specific requirements, reuse is not always the most economical solution, but, in cases where reuse is in part motivated by other factors such as heritage protection, substantial economic and environmental savings can be realized in tandem. Based on nearly two decades of professional experience, a generalized assessment method for reuse is proposed to facilitate benefit maximization. Applying this 10-step method, the costs related to building replacement and sustainable reuse are compared using two case histories and a theoretical building. A clear correlation is shown with the potential for savings as a function of project size.

AB - Building reuse is a linchpin to managing solid waste. Despite the various benefits beyond contributing to sustainability that can be realized through building reuse, including direct and indirect cost savings, truncated construction schedules, and reduced site disruptions, little formal consideration has been given to this topic, which places professional engineers at a disadvantage when considering this as a design option. As each building project has its own specific requirements, reuse is not always the most economical solution, but, in cases where reuse is in part motivated by other factors such as heritage protection, substantial economic and environmental savings can be realized in tandem. Based on nearly two decades of professional experience, a generalized assessment method for reuse is proposed to facilitate benefit maximization. Applying this 10-step method, the costs related to building replacement and sustainable reuse are compared using two case histories and a theoretical building. A clear correlation is shown with the potential for savings as a function of project size.

KW - Demolition

KW - Pile foundations

KW - Reconstruction

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Renovation

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Urban areas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39349109435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39349109435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(217)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(217)

M3 - Article

VL - 134

SP - 217

EP - 227

JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9364

IS - 3

ER -