Building blocks of bias: Gender composition predicts male and female group members' evaluations of each other and the group

Tessa West, Madeline Heilman, Lindy Gullett, Corinne A. Moss-Racusin, Joe C. Magee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present research examined how a group's gender composition influences intragroup evaluations. Group members evaluated fellow group members and the group as a whole following a shared task. As predicted, no performance differences were found as a function of gender composition, but judgments of individuals' task contributions, the group's effectiveness, and desire to work with one's group again measured at a 10-week follow-up were increasingly negative as the proportion of women in the group increased. Negative judgments were consistently directed at male and female group members as indicated by no gender of target effects, demonstrating that men, simply by working alongside women, can be detrimentally affected by negative stereotypes about women. Implications for gender diversity in the workplace are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1209-1212
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Sexism
group membership
gender
trend
evaluation
Group
Working Women
proportion of women
Workplace
working woman
stereotype
workplace
Research
performance

Keywords

  • Group processes
  • Intergroup relations
  • Stereotyping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Building blocks of bias : Gender composition predicts male and female group members' evaluations of each other and the group. / West, Tessa; Heilman, Madeline; Gullett, Lindy; Moss-Racusin, Corinne A.; Magee, Joe C.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 5, 09.2012, p. 1209-1212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d01d403887884f2899cea1e72715dd64,
title = "Building blocks of bias: Gender composition predicts male and female group members' evaluations of each other and the group",
abstract = "The present research examined how a group's gender composition influences intragroup evaluations. Group members evaluated fellow group members and the group as a whole following a shared task. As predicted, no performance differences were found as a function of gender composition, but judgments of individuals' task contributions, the group's effectiveness, and desire to work with one's group again measured at a 10-week follow-up were increasingly negative as the proportion of women in the group increased. Negative judgments were consistently directed at male and female group members as indicated by no gender of target effects, demonstrating that men, simply by working alongside women, can be detrimentally affected by negative stereotypes about women. Implications for gender diversity in the workplace are discussed.",
keywords = "Group processes, Intergroup relations, Stereotyping",
author = "Tessa West and Madeline Heilman and Lindy Gullett and Moss-Racusin, {Corinne A.} and Magee, {Joe C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1209--1212",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building blocks of bias

T2 - Gender composition predicts male and female group members' evaluations of each other and the group

AU - West, Tessa

AU - Heilman, Madeline

AU - Gullett, Lindy

AU - Moss-Racusin, Corinne A.

AU - Magee, Joe C.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - The present research examined how a group's gender composition influences intragroup evaluations. Group members evaluated fellow group members and the group as a whole following a shared task. As predicted, no performance differences were found as a function of gender composition, but judgments of individuals' task contributions, the group's effectiveness, and desire to work with one's group again measured at a 10-week follow-up were increasingly negative as the proportion of women in the group increased. Negative judgments were consistently directed at male and female group members as indicated by no gender of target effects, demonstrating that men, simply by working alongside women, can be detrimentally affected by negative stereotypes about women. Implications for gender diversity in the workplace are discussed.

AB - The present research examined how a group's gender composition influences intragroup evaluations. Group members evaluated fellow group members and the group as a whole following a shared task. As predicted, no performance differences were found as a function of gender composition, but judgments of individuals' task contributions, the group's effectiveness, and desire to work with one's group again measured at a 10-week follow-up were increasingly negative as the proportion of women in the group increased. Negative judgments were consistently directed at male and female group members as indicated by no gender of target effects, demonstrating that men, simply by working alongside women, can be detrimentally affected by negative stereotypes about women. Implications for gender diversity in the workplace are discussed.

KW - Group processes

KW - Intergroup relations

KW - Stereotyping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863307125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863307125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84863307125

VL - 48

SP - 1209

EP - 1212

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 5

ER -