Brownian occupation measures, compactness and large deviations

Chiranjib Mukherjee, S. R.S. Varadhan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In proving large deviation estimates, the lower bound for open sets and upper bound for compact sets are essentially local estimates. On the other hand, the upper bound for closed sets is global and compactness of space or an exponential tightness estimate is needed to establish it. In dealing with the occupation measure Lt (A) = 1/t ∫0t 1A(Ws) ds of the d-dimensional Brownian motion, which is not positive recurrent, there is no possibility of exponential tightness. The space of probability distributions M1(ℝd) can be compactified by replacing the usual topology of weak convergence by the vague toplogy, where the space is treated as the dual of continuous functions with compact support. This is essentially the one point compactification of ℝd by adding a point at ∞ that results in the compactification of M1(ℝd) by allowing some mass to escape to the point at ∞. If one were to use only test functions that are continuous and vanish at ∞, then the compactification results in the space of sub-probability distributions M≤1(ℝd) by ignoring the mass at∞. The main drawback of this compactification is that it ignores the underlying translation invariance. More explicitly, we may be interested in the space of equivalence classes of orbits M1 = M1(ℝd) under the action of the translation group ℝd on M1(ℝd). There are problems for which it is natural to compactify this space of orbits. We will provide such a compactification, prove a large deviation principle there and give an application to a relevant problem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3934-3964
Number of pages31
JournalAnnals of Probability
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Compactification
  • Large deviations
  • Occupation measures
  • Polaron problem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this