Bringing the sociology of media back in

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

In political communication research, news media tend to be studied more as a dependent than independent variable. That is, few studies link structural characteristics of media systems to the production of journalistic discourse about politics. One reason for this relative silence is the inadequacy of prevalent theories. Influential scholars in sociology and political communication such as Jürgen Habermas, Manuel Castells, and William Gamson provide only sketchy, institutionally underspecified accounts of media systems. Likewise, models in the sociology of news have tended to either aggregate societal level influences (chiefly political and economic) that are analytically and often empirically quite distinct or overemphasize micro-level influences (news routines, bureaucratic pressures). In between such micro- and macro-influences, the mezzo-level "journalistic field" represents an important shaping factor heretofore largely ignored. As path-dependent institutional logics, fields help ground cultural analysis; as interorganizational spatial environments varying in their level of concentration, they explain heretofore undertheorized aspects of news production. Drawing on the sociology of news and field theory (Bourdieu and American new institutionalism), this essay offers a series of hypotheses about how variable characteristics of media systems shape news discourse. Since variation at the system level is most clearly seen via cross-national comparative studies, international research is best positioned to build more generalizable theory about the production of journalistically mediated political discourse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-292
Number of pages18
JournalPolitical Communication
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

sociology
news
media system
political communication
Communication
Macros
discourse
field theory
Economics
cultural analysis
institutionalism
political influence
communication research
micro level
politics
economics

Keywords

  • American and European journalism
  • Bourdieu
  • Comparative media research
  • Culture
  • Discourse and content analysis
  • Field theory
  • Journalistic field
  • New institutionalism
  • Political economy
  • Sociology of news

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Bringing the sociology of media back in. / Benson, Rodney.

In: Political Communication, Vol. 21, No. 3, 07.2004, p. 275-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{28002a12ce934d1baf5b52c934dc9b62,
title = "Bringing the sociology of media back in",
abstract = "In political communication research, news media tend to be studied more as a dependent than independent variable. That is, few studies link structural characteristics of media systems to the production of journalistic discourse about politics. One reason for this relative silence is the inadequacy of prevalent theories. Influential scholars in sociology and political communication such as J{\"u}rgen Habermas, Manuel Castells, and William Gamson provide only sketchy, institutionally underspecified accounts of media systems. Likewise, models in the sociology of news have tended to either aggregate societal level influences (chiefly political and economic) that are analytically and often empirically quite distinct or overemphasize micro-level influences (news routines, bureaucratic pressures). In between such micro- and macro-influences, the mezzo-level {"}journalistic field{"} represents an important shaping factor heretofore largely ignored. As path-dependent institutional logics, fields help ground cultural analysis; as interorganizational spatial environments varying in their level of concentration, they explain heretofore undertheorized aspects of news production. Drawing on the sociology of news and field theory (Bourdieu and American new institutionalism), this essay offers a series of hypotheses about how variable characteristics of media systems shape news discourse. Since variation at the system level is most clearly seen via cross-national comparative studies, international research is best positioned to build more generalizable theory about the production of journalistically mediated political discourse.",
keywords = "American and European journalism, Bourdieu, Comparative media research, Culture, Discourse and content analysis, Field theory, Journalistic field, New institutionalism, Political economy, Sociology of news",
author = "Rodney Benson",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/10584600490481299",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "275--292",
journal = "Political Communication",
issn = "1058-4609",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bringing the sociology of media back in

AU - Benson, Rodney

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - In political communication research, news media tend to be studied more as a dependent than independent variable. That is, few studies link structural characteristics of media systems to the production of journalistic discourse about politics. One reason for this relative silence is the inadequacy of prevalent theories. Influential scholars in sociology and political communication such as Jürgen Habermas, Manuel Castells, and William Gamson provide only sketchy, institutionally underspecified accounts of media systems. Likewise, models in the sociology of news have tended to either aggregate societal level influences (chiefly political and economic) that are analytically and often empirically quite distinct or overemphasize micro-level influences (news routines, bureaucratic pressures). In between such micro- and macro-influences, the mezzo-level "journalistic field" represents an important shaping factor heretofore largely ignored. As path-dependent institutional logics, fields help ground cultural analysis; as interorganizational spatial environments varying in their level of concentration, they explain heretofore undertheorized aspects of news production. Drawing on the sociology of news and field theory (Bourdieu and American new institutionalism), this essay offers a series of hypotheses about how variable characteristics of media systems shape news discourse. Since variation at the system level is most clearly seen via cross-national comparative studies, international research is best positioned to build more generalizable theory about the production of journalistically mediated political discourse.

AB - In political communication research, news media tend to be studied more as a dependent than independent variable. That is, few studies link structural characteristics of media systems to the production of journalistic discourse about politics. One reason for this relative silence is the inadequacy of prevalent theories. Influential scholars in sociology and political communication such as Jürgen Habermas, Manuel Castells, and William Gamson provide only sketchy, institutionally underspecified accounts of media systems. Likewise, models in the sociology of news have tended to either aggregate societal level influences (chiefly political and economic) that are analytically and often empirically quite distinct or overemphasize micro-level influences (news routines, bureaucratic pressures). In between such micro- and macro-influences, the mezzo-level "journalistic field" represents an important shaping factor heretofore largely ignored. As path-dependent institutional logics, fields help ground cultural analysis; as interorganizational spatial environments varying in their level of concentration, they explain heretofore undertheorized aspects of news production. Drawing on the sociology of news and field theory (Bourdieu and American new institutionalism), this essay offers a series of hypotheses about how variable characteristics of media systems shape news discourse. Since variation at the system level is most clearly seen via cross-national comparative studies, international research is best positioned to build more generalizable theory about the production of journalistically mediated political discourse.

KW - American and European journalism

KW - Bourdieu

KW - Comparative media research

KW - Culture

KW - Discourse and content analysis

KW - Field theory

KW - Journalistic field

KW - New institutionalism

KW - Political economy

KW - Sociology of news

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4444361519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4444361519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10584600490481299

DO - 10.1080/10584600490481299

M3 - Review article

VL - 21

SP - 275

EP - 292

JO - Political Communication

JF - Political Communication

SN - 1058-4609

IS - 3

ER -