Borderline science: Expert testimony and the Red River boundary dispute

Eugene Cittadino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The 1918 discovery of oil in the bed of the Red River, which forms the border between Texas and Oklahoma, led to a U.S. Supreme Court case that involved the extensive use of expert witnesses in fields such as geology, geography, and ecology. What began as a dispute between the two states soon became a multisided controversy involving those states, the federal government, Native Americans, and individual placer-mining claimants. After the federal attorneys introduced scientific experts into the dispute, including the plant ecologist Henry Chandler Cowles and the geographer Isaiah Bowman, fresh from negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference, Texas attorneys fielded their own team of opposing experts. Charged with the task of determining the location of the border, defined as the south bank of the river at the time of the 1819 treaty with Spain, the scientific experts presented the court with volumes of evidence and elaborate arguments, much of it contradictory and involving creative interpretations of existing theories. The case exhibited all the now-familiar features of a trial using expert witnesses, for which it represents an early, overlooked, and particularly complex example.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-219
Number of pages37
JournalIsis
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

boundary dispute
testimony
river
expert
science
witness
geology
ecology
oil
treaty
Federal Government
Supreme Court
peace
bank
Spain
court
border
Expert Testimony
Dispute
geography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • History
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Borderline science : Expert testimony and the Red River boundary dispute. / Cittadino, Eugene.

In: Isis, Vol. 95, No. 2, 2004, p. 183-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cittadino, Eugene. / Borderline science : Expert testimony and the Red River boundary dispute. In: Isis. 2004 ; Vol. 95, No. 2. pp. 183-219.
@article{854fd516ec9d41f5bde617a039b4c366,
title = "Borderline science: Expert testimony and the Red River boundary dispute",
abstract = "The 1918 discovery of oil in the bed of the Red River, which forms the border between Texas and Oklahoma, led to a U.S. Supreme Court case that involved the extensive use of expert witnesses in fields such as geology, geography, and ecology. What began as a dispute between the two states soon became a multisided controversy involving those states, the federal government, Native Americans, and individual placer-mining claimants. After the federal attorneys introduced scientific experts into the dispute, including the plant ecologist Henry Chandler Cowles and the geographer Isaiah Bowman, fresh from negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference, Texas attorneys fielded their own team of opposing experts. Charged with the task of determining the location of the border, defined as the south bank of the river at the time of the 1819 treaty with Spain, the scientific experts presented the court with volumes of evidence and elaborate arguments, much of it contradictory and involving creative interpretations of existing theories. The case exhibited all the now-familiar features of a trial using expert witnesses, for which it represents an early, overlooked, and particularly complex example.",
author = "Eugene Cittadino",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1086/426194",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "183--219",
journal = "Isis",
issn = "0021-1753",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Borderline science

T2 - Expert testimony and the Red River boundary dispute

AU - Cittadino, Eugene

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The 1918 discovery of oil in the bed of the Red River, which forms the border between Texas and Oklahoma, led to a U.S. Supreme Court case that involved the extensive use of expert witnesses in fields such as geology, geography, and ecology. What began as a dispute between the two states soon became a multisided controversy involving those states, the federal government, Native Americans, and individual placer-mining claimants. After the federal attorneys introduced scientific experts into the dispute, including the plant ecologist Henry Chandler Cowles and the geographer Isaiah Bowman, fresh from negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference, Texas attorneys fielded their own team of opposing experts. Charged with the task of determining the location of the border, defined as the south bank of the river at the time of the 1819 treaty with Spain, the scientific experts presented the court with volumes of evidence and elaborate arguments, much of it contradictory and involving creative interpretations of existing theories. The case exhibited all the now-familiar features of a trial using expert witnesses, for which it represents an early, overlooked, and particularly complex example.

AB - The 1918 discovery of oil in the bed of the Red River, which forms the border between Texas and Oklahoma, led to a U.S. Supreme Court case that involved the extensive use of expert witnesses in fields such as geology, geography, and ecology. What began as a dispute between the two states soon became a multisided controversy involving those states, the federal government, Native Americans, and individual placer-mining claimants. After the federal attorneys introduced scientific experts into the dispute, including the plant ecologist Henry Chandler Cowles and the geographer Isaiah Bowman, fresh from negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference, Texas attorneys fielded their own team of opposing experts. Charged with the task of determining the location of the border, defined as the south bank of the river at the time of the 1819 treaty with Spain, the scientific experts presented the court with volumes of evidence and elaborate arguments, much of it contradictory and involving creative interpretations of existing theories. The case exhibited all the now-familiar features of a trial using expert witnesses, for which it represents an early, overlooked, and particularly complex example.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7444252662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7444252662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/426194

DO - 10.1086/426194

M3 - Article

C2 - 15490965

AN - SCOPUS:7444252662

VL - 95

SP - 183

EP - 219

JO - Isis

JF - Isis

SN - 0021-1753

IS - 2

ER -