Body and soul: Do children distinguish between foods when generalizing biological and psychological properties?

Jean Pierre Thibaut, Simone P. Nguyen, Gregory Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research Findings: In 2 experiments, we tested whether children generalize psychological and biological properties to novel foods. We used an induction task in which a property (either biological or psychological) was associated with a target food. Children were then asked whether a taxonomically related and a script-related food would also have the property. In a yes/no task (Experiment 1) 9-year-olds preferentially generalized the property to taxonomically related foods, but 4- and 6-year-olds did not. In a forced-choice task (Experiment 2; 4- to 6-year-olds), children preferred the taxonomic choice over the script choice. This preference was weak at age 4 but established by age 5. In both experiments, and all age groups, biological properties, and psychological properties were treated similarly. It is argued that the children do not distinguish biological and psychological properties of food most likely because they believe that psychological properties are caused by biological dispositions. Practice or Policy: We argue that nutrition education should take advantage of children’s existing knowledge of food categories and how children generalize knowledge from 1 food to another. In particular, children have good knowledge of taxonomic categories and can best access that knowledge when they are required to compare different foods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalEarly Education and Development
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 20 2016

Fingerprint

Psychology
food
Food
experiment
nutrition education
induction
disposition
age group
Age Groups
Education
Research
knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Body and soul : Do children distinguish between foods when generalizing biological and psychological properties? / Thibaut, Jean Pierre; Nguyen, Simone P.; Murphy, Gregory.

In: Early Education and Development, 20.03.2016, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9335dcb48d8b4df68cd8fd9cfc1b6752,
title = "Body and soul: Do children distinguish between foods when generalizing biological and psychological properties?",
abstract = "Research Findings: In 2 experiments, we tested whether children generalize psychological and biological properties to novel foods. We used an induction task in which a property (either biological or psychological) was associated with a target food. Children were then asked whether a taxonomically related and a script-related food would also have the property. In a yes/no task (Experiment 1) 9-year-olds preferentially generalized the property to taxonomically related foods, but 4- and 6-year-olds did not. In a forced-choice task (Experiment 2; 4- to 6-year-olds), children preferred the taxonomic choice over the script choice. This preference was weak at age 4 but established by age 5. In both experiments, and all age groups, biological properties, and psychological properties were treated similarly. It is argued that the children do not distinguish biological and psychological properties of food most likely because they believe that psychological properties are caused by biological dispositions. Practice or Policy: We argue that nutrition education should take advantage of children’s existing knowledge of food categories and how children generalize knowledge from 1 food to another. In particular, children have good knowledge of taxonomic categories and can best access that knowledge when they are required to compare different foods.",
author = "Thibaut, {Jean Pierre} and Nguyen, {Simone P.} and Gregory Murphy",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/10409289.2016.1146551",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Early Education and Development",
issn = "1040-9289",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body and soul

T2 - Do children distinguish between foods when generalizing biological and psychological properties?

AU - Thibaut, Jean Pierre

AU - Nguyen, Simone P.

AU - Murphy, Gregory

PY - 2016/3/20

Y1 - 2016/3/20

N2 - Research Findings: In 2 experiments, we tested whether children generalize psychological and biological properties to novel foods. We used an induction task in which a property (either biological or psychological) was associated with a target food. Children were then asked whether a taxonomically related and a script-related food would also have the property. In a yes/no task (Experiment 1) 9-year-olds preferentially generalized the property to taxonomically related foods, but 4- and 6-year-olds did not. In a forced-choice task (Experiment 2; 4- to 6-year-olds), children preferred the taxonomic choice over the script choice. This preference was weak at age 4 but established by age 5. In both experiments, and all age groups, biological properties, and psychological properties were treated similarly. It is argued that the children do not distinguish biological and psychological properties of food most likely because they believe that psychological properties are caused by biological dispositions. Practice or Policy: We argue that nutrition education should take advantage of children’s existing knowledge of food categories and how children generalize knowledge from 1 food to another. In particular, children have good knowledge of taxonomic categories and can best access that knowledge when they are required to compare different foods.

AB - Research Findings: In 2 experiments, we tested whether children generalize psychological and biological properties to novel foods. We used an induction task in which a property (either biological or psychological) was associated with a target food. Children were then asked whether a taxonomically related and a script-related food would also have the property. In a yes/no task (Experiment 1) 9-year-olds preferentially generalized the property to taxonomically related foods, but 4- and 6-year-olds did not. In a forced-choice task (Experiment 2; 4- to 6-year-olds), children preferred the taxonomic choice over the script choice. This preference was weak at age 4 but established by age 5. In both experiments, and all age groups, biological properties, and psychological properties were treated similarly. It is argued that the children do not distinguish biological and psychological properties of food most likely because they believe that psychological properties are caused by biological dispositions. Practice or Policy: We argue that nutrition education should take advantage of children’s existing knowledge of food categories and how children generalize knowledge from 1 food to another. In particular, children have good knowledge of taxonomic categories and can best access that knowledge when they are required to compare different foods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961391082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961391082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10409289.2016.1146551

DO - 10.1080/10409289.2016.1146551

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961391082

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Early Education and Development

JF - Early Education and Development

SN - 1040-9289

ER -