Blocking in Category Learning

Lewis Bott, Aaron B. Hoffman, Gregory L. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many theories of category learning assume that learning is driven by a need to minimize classification error. When there is no classification error, therefore, learning of individual features should be negligible. The authors tested this hypothesis by conducting three category-learning experiments adapted from an associative learning blocking paradigm. Contrary to an error-driven account of learning, participants learned a wide range of information when they learned about categories, and blocking effects were difficult to obtain. Conversely, when participants learned to predict an outcome in a task with the same formal structure and materials, blocking effects were robust and followed the predictions of error-driven learning. The authors discuss their findings in relation to models of category learning and the usefulness of category knowledge in the environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-699
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume136
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Learning

Keywords

  • blocking
  • categorization
  • category learning
  • error-driven learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Blocking in Category Learning. / Bott, Lewis; Hoffman, Aaron B.; Murphy, Gregory L.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 136, No. 4, 11.2007, p. 685-699.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bott, Lewis ; Hoffman, Aaron B. ; Murphy, Gregory L. / Blocking in Category Learning. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2007 ; Vol. 136, No. 4. pp. 685-699.
@article{be97a8e978114d78ab028a30c2472c25,
title = "Blocking in Category Learning",
abstract = "Many theories of category learning assume that learning is driven by a need to minimize classification error. When there is no classification error, therefore, learning of individual features should be negligible. The authors tested this hypothesis by conducting three category-learning experiments adapted from an associative learning blocking paradigm. Contrary to an error-driven account of learning, participants learned a wide range of information when they learned about categories, and blocking effects were difficult to obtain. Conversely, when participants learned to predict an outcome in a task with the same formal structure and materials, blocking effects were robust and followed the predictions of error-driven learning. The authors discuss their findings in relation to models of category learning and the usefulness of category knowledge in the environment.",
keywords = "blocking, categorization, category learning, error-driven learning",
author = "Lewis Bott and Hoffman, {Aaron B.} and Murphy, {Gregory L.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.685",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "685--699",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blocking in Category Learning

AU - Bott, Lewis

AU - Hoffman, Aaron B.

AU - Murphy, Gregory L.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Many theories of category learning assume that learning is driven by a need to minimize classification error. When there is no classification error, therefore, learning of individual features should be negligible. The authors tested this hypothesis by conducting three category-learning experiments adapted from an associative learning blocking paradigm. Contrary to an error-driven account of learning, participants learned a wide range of information when they learned about categories, and blocking effects were difficult to obtain. Conversely, when participants learned to predict an outcome in a task with the same formal structure and materials, blocking effects were robust and followed the predictions of error-driven learning. The authors discuss their findings in relation to models of category learning and the usefulness of category knowledge in the environment.

AB - Many theories of category learning assume that learning is driven by a need to minimize classification error. When there is no classification error, therefore, learning of individual features should be negligible. The authors tested this hypothesis by conducting three category-learning experiments adapted from an associative learning blocking paradigm. Contrary to an error-driven account of learning, participants learned a wide range of information when they learned about categories, and blocking effects were difficult to obtain. Conversely, when participants learned to predict an outcome in a task with the same formal structure and materials, blocking effects were robust and followed the predictions of error-driven learning. The authors discuss their findings in relation to models of category learning and the usefulness of category knowledge in the environment.

KW - blocking

KW - categorization

KW - category learning

KW - error-driven learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36249004338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36249004338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.685

DO - 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.685

M3 - Article

C2 - 17999579

AN - SCOPUS:36249004338

VL - 136

SP - 685

EP - 699

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 4

ER -