Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity

Patrick Schmidt, Matthias Blessing, Maxime Rageot, Radu Iovita, Johannes Pfleging, Klaus G. Nickel, Ludovic Righetti, Claudio Tennie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Birch tar production by Neanderthals—used for hafting tools—has been interpreted as one of the earliest manifestations of modern cultural behavior. This is because birch tar production per se was assumed to require a cognitively demanding setup, in which birch bark is heated in anaerobic conditions, a setup whose inherent complexity was thought to require modern levels of cognition and cultural transmission. Here we demonstrate that recognizable amounts of birch tar were likely a relatively frequent byproduct of burning birch bark (a natural tinder) under common, i.e., aerobic, conditions. We show that when birch bark burns close to a vertical to subvertical hard surface, such as an adjacent stone, birch tar is naturally deposited and can be easily scraped off the surface. The burning of birch bark near suitable surfaces provides useable quantities of birch tar in a single work session (3 h; including birch bark procurement). Chemical analysis of the resulting tar showed typical markers present in archaeological tar. Mechanical tests verify the tar’s suitability for hafting and for hafted tools use. Given that similarly sized stones as in our experiment are frequently found in archaeological contexts associated with Neanderthals, the cognitively undemanding connection between burning birch bark and the production of birch tar would have been readily discoverable multiple times. Thus, the presence of birch tar alone cannot indicate the presence of modern cognition and/or cultural behaviors in Neanderthals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17707-17711
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume116
Issue number36
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2019

Fingerprint

Neanderthals
Tars
Betula
Cognition

Keywords

  • Adhesives
  • Cognitive complexity
  • Early pyrotechnology
  • Modern behaviors
  • Neanderthal birch tar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Schmidt, P., Blessing, M., Rageot, M., Iovita, R., Pfleging, J., Nickel, K. G., ... Tennie, C. (2019). Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(36), 17707-17711. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911137116

Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity. / Schmidt, Patrick; Blessing, Matthias; Rageot, Maxime; Iovita, Radu; Pfleging, Johannes; Nickel, Klaus G.; Righetti, Ludovic; Tennie, Claudio.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 116, No. 36, 03.09.2019, p. 17707-17711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schmidt, Patrick ; Blessing, Matthias ; Rageot, Maxime ; Iovita, Radu ; Pfleging, Johannes ; Nickel, Klaus G. ; Righetti, Ludovic ; Tennie, Claudio. / Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019 ; Vol. 116, No. 36. pp. 17707-17711.
@article{424b341dd510471598468629ab8ac24b,
title = "Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity",
abstract = "Birch tar production by Neanderthals—used for hafting tools—has been interpreted as one of the earliest manifestations of modern cultural behavior. This is because birch tar production per se was assumed to require a cognitively demanding setup, in which birch bark is heated in anaerobic conditions, a setup whose inherent complexity was thought to require modern levels of cognition and cultural transmission. Here we demonstrate that recognizable amounts of birch tar were likely a relatively frequent byproduct of burning birch bark (a natural tinder) under common, i.e., aerobic, conditions. We show that when birch bark burns close to a vertical to subvertical hard surface, such as an adjacent stone, birch tar is naturally deposited and can be easily scraped off the surface. The burning of birch bark near suitable surfaces provides useable quantities of birch tar in a single work session (3 h; including birch bark procurement). Chemical analysis of the resulting tar showed typical markers present in archaeological tar. Mechanical tests verify the tar’s suitability for hafting and for hafted tools use. Given that similarly sized stones as in our experiment are frequently found in archaeological contexts associated with Neanderthals, the cognitively undemanding connection between burning birch bark and the production of birch tar would have been readily discoverable multiple times. Thus, the presence of birch tar alone cannot indicate the presence of modern cognition and/or cultural behaviors in Neanderthals.",
keywords = "Adhesives, Cognitive complexity, Early pyrotechnology, Modern behaviors, Neanderthal birch tar",
author = "Patrick Schmidt and Matthias Blessing and Maxime Rageot and Radu Iovita and Johannes Pfleging and Nickel, {Klaus G.} and Ludovic Righetti and Claudio Tennie",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1911137116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "17707--17711",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "36",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity

AU - Schmidt, Patrick

AU - Blessing, Matthias

AU - Rageot, Maxime

AU - Iovita, Radu

AU - Pfleging, Johannes

AU - Nickel, Klaus G.

AU - Righetti, Ludovic

AU - Tennie, Claudio

PY - 2019/9/3

Y1 - 2019/9/3

N2 - Birch tar production by Neanderthals—used for hafting tools—has been interpreted as one of the earliest manifestations of modern cultural behavior. This is because birch tar production per se was assumed to require a cognitively demanding setup, in which birch bark is heated in anaerobic conditions, a setup whose inherent complexity was thought to require modern levels of cognition and cultural transmission. Here we demonstrate that recognizable amounts of birch tar were likely a relatively frequent byproduct of burning birch bark (a natural tinder) under common, i.e., aerobic, conditions. We show that when birch bark burns close to a vertical to subvertical hard surface, such as an adjacent stone, birch tar is naturally deposited and can be easily scraped off the surface. The burning of birch bark near suitable surfaces provides useable quantities of birch tar in a single work session (3 h; including birch bark procurement). Chemical analysis of the resulting tar showed typical markers present in archaeological tar. Mechanical tests verify the tar’s suitability for hafting and for hafted tools use. Given that similarly sized stones as in our experiment are frequently found in archaeological contexts associated with Neanderthals, the cognitively undemanding connection between burning birch bark and the production of birch tar would have been readily discoverable multiple times. Thus, the presence of birch tar alone cannot indicate the presence of modern cognition and/or cultural behaviors in Neanderthals.

AB - Birch tar production by Neanderthals—used for hafting tools—has been interpreted as one of the earliest manifestations of modern cultural behavior. This is because birch tar production per se was assumed to require a cognitively demanding setup, in which birch bark is heated in anaerobic conditions, a setup whose inherent complexity was thought to require modern levels of cognition and cultural transmission. Here we demonstrate that recognizable amounts of birch tar were likely a relatively frequent byproduct of burning birch bark (a natural tinder) under common, i.e., aerobic, conditions. We show that when birch bark burns close to a vertical to subvertical hard surface, such as an adjacent stone, birch tar is naturally deposited and can be easily scraped off the surface. The burning of birch bark near suitable surfaces provides useable quantities of birch tar in a single work session (3 h; including birch bark procurement). Chemical analysis of the resulting tar showed typical markers present in archaeological tar. Mechanical tests verify the tar’s suitability for hafting and for hafted tools use. Given that similarly sized stones as in our experiment are frequently found in archaeological contexts associated with Neanderthals, the cognitively undemanding connection between burning birch bark and the production of birch tar would have been readily discoverable multiple times. Thus, the presence of birch tar alone cannot indicate the presence of modern cognition and/or cultural behaviors in Neanderthals.

KW - Adhesives

KW - Cognitive complexity

KW - Early pyrotechnology

KW - Modern behaviors

KW - Neanderthal birch tar

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071788567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071788567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1911137116

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1911137116

M3 - Article

C2 - 31427508

AN - SCOPUS:85071788567

VL - 116

SP - 17707

EP - 17711

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 36

ER -