Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces

Paulo Coelho, Charles Marin, Rodrigo Granato, Gabriela Giro, Marcelo Suzuki, Estevam A. Bonfante

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the biomechanical fixation and histomorphometric parameters between two implant surfaces: non-washed resorbable blasting media (NWRBM) and alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE), in a dog model. Material and methods: The surface topography was assessed by scanning electron microscopy, optical interferometry and chemistry by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Six beagle dogs of ~1.5 years of age were utilized and each animal received one implant of each surface per limb (distal radii sites). After a healing period of 3 weeks, the animals were euthanized and half of the implants were biomechanically tested (removal torque) and the other half was referred to nondecalcified histology processing. Histomorphometric analysis considered bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). Following data normality check with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, statistical analysis was performed by paired t-tests at 95% level of significance. Results: Surface roughness parameters S a (average surface roughness) and S q (mean root square of the surface) were significantly lower for the NWRBM compared with AB/AE. The XPS spectra revealed the presence of Ca and P in the NWRBM. While no significant differences were observed for both BIC and BAFO parameters (P>0.35 and P>0.11, respectively), a significantly higher level of torque was observed for the NWRBM group (P=0.01). Bone morphology was similar between groups, which presented newly formed woven bone in proximity with the implant surfaces. Conclusion: A significant increase in early biomechanical fixation was observed for implants presenting the NWRBM surface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-135
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Aluminum Oxide
Bone and Bones
Acids
Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Torque
Dogs
Interferometry
Nonparametric Statistics
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Histology
Extremities

Keywords

  • Histology
  • Implant surface
  • In vivo
  • Osseointegration; torque

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces. / Coelho, Paulo; Marin, Charles; Granato, Rodrigo; Giro, Gabriela; Suzuki, Marcelo; Bonfante, Estevam A.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 132-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coelho, Paulo ; Marin, Charles ; Granato, Rodrigo ; Giro, Gabriela ; Suzuki, Marcelo ; Bonfante, Estevam A. / Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 132-135.
@article{fd4d624102aa48e1badad8dfec588df1,
title = "Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces",
abstract = "Objectives: To compare the biomechanical fixation and histomorphometric parameters between two implant surfaces: non-washed resorbable blasting media (NWRBM) and alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE), in a dog model. Material and methods: The surface topography was assessed by scanning electron microscopy, optical interferometry and chemistry by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Six beagle dogs of ~1.5 years of age were utilized and each animal received one implant of each surface per limb (distal radii sites). After a healing period of 3 weeks, the animals were euthanized and half of the implants were biomechanically tested (removal torque) and the other half was referred to nondecalcified histology processing. Histomorphometric analysis considered bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). Following data normality check with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, statistical analysis was performed by paired t-tests at 95{\%} level of significance. Results: Surface roughness parameters S a (average surface roughness) and S q (mean root square of the surface) were significantly lower for the NWRBM compared with AB/AE. The XPS spectra revealed the presence of Ca and P in the NWRBM. While no significant differences were observed for both BIC and BAFO parameters (P>0.35 and P>0.11, respectively), a significantly higher level of torque was observed for the NWRBM group (P=0.01). Bone morphology was similar between groups, which presented newly formed woven bone in proximity with the implant surfaces. Conclusion: A significant increase in early biomechanical fixation was observed for implants presenting the NWRBM surface.",
keywords = "Histology, Implant surface, In vivo, Osseointegration; torque",
author = "Paulo Coelho and Charles Marin and Rodrigo Granato and Gabriela Giro and Marcelo Suzuki and Bonfante, {Estevam A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02147.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "132--135",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces

AU - Coelho, Paulo

AU - Marin, Charles

AU - Granato, Rodrigo

AU - Giro, Gabriela

AU - Suzuki, Marcelo

AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Objectives: To compare the biomechanical fixation and histomorphometric parameters between two implant surfaces: non-washed resorbable blasting media (NWRBM) and alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE), in a dog model. Material and methods: The surface topography was assessed by scanning electron microscopy, optical interferometry and chemistry by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Six beagle dogs of ~1.5 years of age were utilized and each animal received one implant of each surface per limb (distal radii sites). After a healing period of 3 weeks, the animals were euthanized and half of the implants were biomechanically tested (removal torque) and the other half was referred to nondecalcified histology processing. Histomorphometric analysis considered bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). Following data normality check with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, statistical analysis was performed by paired t-tests at 95% level of significance. Results: Surface roughness parameters S a (average surface roughness) and S q (mean root square of the surface) were significantly lower for the NWRBM compared with AB/AE. The XPS spectra revealed the presence of Ca and P in the NWRBM. While no significant differences were observed for both BIC and BAFO parameters (P>0.35 and P>0.11, respectively), a significantly higher level of torque was observed for the NWRBM group (P=0.01). Bone morphology was similar between groups, which presented newly formed woven bone in proximity with the implant surfaces. Conclusion: A significant increase in early biomechanical fixation was observed for implants presenting the NWRBM surface.

AB - Objectives: To compare the biomechanical fixation and histomorphometric parameters between two implant surfaces: non-washed resorbable blasting media (NWRBM) and alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE), in a dog model. Material and methods: The surface topography was assessed by scanning electron microscopy, optical interferometry and chemistry by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Six beagle dogs of ~1.5 years of age were utilized and each animal received one implant of each surface per limb (distal radii sites). After a healing period of 3 weeks, the animals were euthanized and half of the implants were biomechanically tested (removal torque) and the other half was referred to nondecalcified histology processing. Histomorphometric analysis considered bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO). Following data normality check with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, statistical analysis was performed by paired t-tests at 95% level of significance. Results: Surface roughness parameters S a (average surface roughness) and S q (mean root square of the surface) were significantly lower for the NWRBM compared with AB/AE. The XPS spectra revealed the presence of Ca and P in the NWRBM. While no significant differences were observed for both BIC and BAFO parameters (P>0.35 and P>0.11, respectively), a significantly higher level of torque was observed for the NWRBM group (P=0.01). Bone morphology was similar between groups, which presented newly formed woven bone in proximity with the implant surfaces. Conclusion: A significant increase in early biomechanical fixation was observed for implants presenting the NWRBM surface.

KW - Histology

KW - Implant surface

KW - In vivo

KW - Osseointegration; torque

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84155164462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84155164462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02147.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02147.x

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 132

EP - 135

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 1

ER -