Beyond the Calculus of Power and Position: Relationships and Theorizing in Ethnography

Ido Tavory

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Ethnography is made of relationships. Even when the observations the ethnographer writes of take place between others in the field, it is through the development of relationships that data are generated and through a particular relationship that interpretation is offered. In this introduction to the special issue about relationships and theorizing in ethnography, I outline three relevant dimensions of such relationships that aren't captured by current debates that center on power dynamics in the field: (a) Alignment. Going beyond the trifecta of race, class, and gender, I suggest that a key element of positionality includes the ways in which the ethnographer’s projects align (or purposely fail to align) with those of her interlocutors; (b) Temporality. Thinking seriously about time allows us to appreciate how differences in the temporal arcs of research modulate the narrative arcs of theory as well as set the stage for the afterlife of participant observation in the process of writing and publishing; and (c) Place. As relationships deepen, ethnographers often find themselves in new spaces, complementing the temporality of narrative arcs with a different landscape of social theory. Doing so, this article calls for renewed attention to the way in which the patterned structure of relationships in the field shapes how ethnographers theorize their work.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)727-738
    Number of pages12
    JournalSociological Methods and Research
    Volume48
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    ethnography
    narrative
    participant observation
    interpretation
    gender
    time

    Keywords

    • ethnography
    • positionality
    • qualitative research
    • temporality
    • theorizing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Beyond the Calculus of Power and Position : Relationships and Theorizing in Ethnography. / Tavory, Ido.

    In: Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 48, No. 4, 01.11.2019, p. 727-738.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{363ec225eb7943ea825790f2a4e15e0f,
    title = "Beyond the Calculus of Power and Position: Relationships and Theorizing in Ethnography",
    abstract = "Ethnography is made of relationships. Even when the observations the ethnographer writes of take place between others in the field, it is through the development of relationships that data are generated and through a particular relationship that interpretation is offered. In this introduction to the special issue about relationships and theorizing in ethnography, I outline three relevant dimensions of such relationships that aren't captured by current debates that center on power dynamics in the field: (a) Alignment. Going beyond the trifecta of race, class, and gender, I suggest that a key element of positionality includes the ways in which the ethnographer’s projects align (or purposely fail to align) with those of her interlocutors; (b) Temporality. Thinking seriously about time allows us to appreciate how differences in the temporal arcs of research modulate the narrative arcs of theory as well as set the stage for the afterlife of participant observation in the process of writing and publishing; and (c) Place. As relationships deepen, ethnographers often find themselves in new spaces, complementing the temporality of narrative arcs with a different landscape of social theory. Doing so, this article calls for renewed attention to the way in which the patterned structure of relationships in the field shapes how ethnographers theorize their work.",
    keywords = "ethnography, positionality, qualitative research, temporality, theorizing",
    author = "Ido Tavory",
    year = "2019",
    month = "11",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0049124119875960",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "48",
    pages = "727--738",
    journal = "Sociological Methods and Research",
    issn = "0049-1241",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Beyond the Calculus of Power and Position

    T2 - Relationships and Theorizing in Ethnography

    AU - Tavory, Ido

    PY - 2019/11/1

    Y1 - 2019/11/1

    N2 - Ethnography is made of relationships. Even when the observations the ethnographer writes of take place between others in the field, it is through the development of relationships that data are generated and through a particular relationship that interpretation is offered. In this introduction to the special issue about relationships and theorizing in ethnography, I outline three relevant dimensions of such relationships that aren't captured by current debates that center on power dynamics in the field: (a) Alignment. Going beyond the trifecta of race, class, and gender, I suggest that a key element of positionality includes the ways in which the ethnographer’s projects align (or purposely fail to align) with those of her interlocutors; (b) Temporality. Thinking seriously about time allows us to appreciate how differences in the temporal arcs of research modulate the narrative arcs of theory as well as set the stage for the afterlife of participant observation in the process of writing and publishing; and (c) Place. As relationships deepen, ethnographers often find themselves in new spaces, complementing the temporality of narrative arcs with a different landscape of social theory. Doing so, this article calls for renewed attention to the way in which the patterned structure of relationships in the field shapes how ethnographers theorize their work.

    AB - Ethnography is made of relationships. Even when the observations the ethnographer writes of take place between others in the field, it is through the development of relationships that data are generated and through a particular relationship that interpretation is offered. In this introduction to the special issue about relationships and theorizing in ethnography, I outline three relevant dimensions of such relationships that aren't captured by current debates that center on power dynamics in the field: (a) Alignment. Going beyond the trifecta of race, class, and gender, I suggest that a key element of positionality includes the ways in which the ethnographer’s projects align (or purposely fail to align) with those of her interlocutors; (b) Temporality. Thinking seriously about time allows us to appreciate how differences in the temporal arcs of research modulate the narrative arcs of theory as well as set the stage for the afterlife of participant observation in the process of writing and publishing; and (c) Place. As relationships deepen, ethnographers often find themselves in new spaces, complementing the temporality of narrative arcs with a different landscape of social theory. Doing so, this article calls for renewed attention to the way in which the patterned structure of relationships in the field shapes how ethnographers theorize their work.

    KW - ethnography

    KW - positionality

    KW - qualitative research

    KW - temporality

    KW - theorizing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073035772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073035772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0049124119875960

    DO - 10.1177/0049124119875960

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85073035772

    VL - 48

    SP - 727

    EP - 738

    JO - Sociological Methods and Research

    JF - Sociological Methods and Research

    SN - 0049-1241

    IS - 4

    ER -