Beyond direct reference: Comparing the present to the past promotes abstract processing

David A. Kalkstein, Alexa D. Hubbard, Yaacov Trope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A primary way that people make sense of their experience is by comparing various objects within their immediate environment to each other and to previously encountered objects. The objects involved in a comparison can be stimuli that are present within one's immediate environment, or mental representations of previously encountered stimuli that are now absent from one's immediate environment. In this research, we propose that the comparison process unfolds differently depending on whether an individual is comparing stimuli that are simultaneously present within a given context or is comparing a target stimulus to a stored representation of a previously encountered source stimulus. Across two studies, we found that people engage in more abstract processing when comparing a present stimulus to a previously encountered source than when comparing two simultaneously present stimuli. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of abstraction in comparison and memory-based reasoning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)933-938
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume147
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Research

Keywords

  • Abstraction
  • Analogical reasoning
  • Comparison
  • Memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Beyond direct reference : Comparing the present to the past promotes abstract processing. / Kalkstein, David A.; Hubbard, Alexa D.; Trope, Yaacov.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 147, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 933-938.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{367a60ad95f64ad48d68ec151e5e0fa4,
title = "Beyond direct reference: Comparing the present to the past promotes abstract processing",
abstract = "A primary way that people make sense of their experience is by comparing various objects within their immediate environment to each other and to previously encountered objects. The objects involved in a comparison can be stimuli that are present within one's immediate environment, or mental representations of previously encountered stimuli that are now absent from one's immediate environment. In this research, we propose that the comparison process unfolds differently depending on whether an individual is comparing stimuli that are simultaneously present within a given context or is comparing a target stimulus to a stored representation of a previously encountered source stimulus. Across two studies, we found that people engage in more abstract processing when comparing a present stimulus to a previously encountered source than when comparing two simultaneously present stimuli. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of abstraction in comparison and memory-based reasoning.",
keywords = "Abstraction, Analogical reasoning, Comparison, Memory",
author = "Kalkstein, {David A.} and Hubbard, {Alexa D.} and Yaacov Trope",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/xge0000448",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "933--938",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond direct reference

T2 - Comparing the present to the past promotes abstract processing

AU - Kalkstein, David A.

AU - Hubbard, Alexa D.

AU - Trope, Yaacov

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - A primary way that people make sense of their experience is by comparing various objects within their immediate environment to each other and to previously encountered objects. The objects involved in a comparison can be stimuli that are present within one's immediate environment, or mental representations of previously encountered stimuli that are now absent from one's immediate environment. In this research, we propose that the comparison process unfolds differently depending on whether an individual is comparing stimuli that are simultaneously present within a given context or is comparing a target stimulus to a stored representation of a previously encountered source stimulus. Across two studies, we found that people engage in more abstract processing when comparing a present stimulus to a previously encountered source than when comparing two simultaneously present stimuli. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of abstraction in comparison and memory-based reasoning.

AB - A primary way that people make sense of their experience is by comparing various objects within their immediate environment to each other and to previously encountered objects. The objects involved in a comparison can be stimuli that are present within one's immediate environment, or mental representations of previously encountered stimuli that are now absent from one's immediate environment. In this research, we propose that the comparison process unfolds differently depending on whether an individual is comparing stimuli that are simultaneously present within a given context or is comparing a target stimulus to a stored representation of a previously encountered source stimulus. Across two studies, we found that people engage in more abstract processing when comparing a present stimulus to a previously encountered source than when comparing two simultaneously present stimuli. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of abstraction in comparison and memory-based reasoning.

KW - Abstraction

KW - Analogical reasoning

KW - Comparison

KW - Memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048342279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048342279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xge0000448

DO - 10.1037/xge0000448

M3 - Article

VL - 147

SP - 933

EP - 938

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 6

ER -