Beyond compliance

Toward an anthropological understanding of international justice

Sally Merry

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In this volume, Mark Goodale and Kamari Clarke courageously tackle the question of the meanings of justice in a world that is exploding with interest in human rights and transitional justice. These initiatives are powered by the idea of justice, and compliance is deeply dependent on the normative support that the evocation of justice provides. Yet, as they point out, justice is an extremely vague and unspecified concept, however powerful. Most people agree that they want justice but have far greater difficulty deciding which dictator of what country should be tried and whether he should be killed for which offenses. It is, as Goodale and Clarke say, the very aspirational quality and substantive openness of the concept of justice that gives it its power. In this regard, the idea of justice differs sharply from that of human rights, which has an elaborate set of legal texts and procedures such as conventions, treaty bodies, complaint mechanisms, and civil society organizations that ferret out abuses and translate them into human rights terms that are recognizable to these international institutions. Human rights specify relatively clearly what justice is and what procedures will produce it. If we ponder the sources of ideas of justice, however, we realize that they are multiple and hardly all grounded in human rights. Responding to the challenge that Goodale and Clarke pose in the introduction, it seems that we are able to identify at least four discrete sources of justice ideas.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationMirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages28-42
    Number of pages15
    ISBN (Electronic)9780511657511
    ISBN (Print)9780521195379
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

    Fingerprint

    Justice
    International Justice
    Human Rights
    Legal Texts
    Civil Society
    Treaties
    Offence
    Openness
    Transitional Justice
    Complaints
    Abuse
    Dictator

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities(all)

    Cite this

    Merry, S. (2009). Beyond compliance: Toward an anthropological understanding of international justice. In Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era (pp. 28-42). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657511.003

    Beyond compliance : Toward an anthropological understanding of international justice. / Merry, Sally.

    Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 28-42.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Merry, S 2009, Beyond compliance: Toward an anthropological understanding of international justice. in Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era. Cambridge University Press, pp. 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657511.003
    Merry S. Beyond compliance: Toward an anthropological understanding of international justice. In Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era. Cambridge University Press. 2009. p. 28-42 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657511.003
    Merry, Sally. / Beyond compliance : Toward an anthropological understanding of international justice. Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 28-42
    @inbook{265236c1265e4285bbe88ded040edbd9,
    title = "Beyond compliance: Toward an anthropological understanding of international justice",
    abstract = "In this volume, Mark Goodale and Kamari Clarke courageously tackle the question of the meanings of justice in a world that is exploding with interest in human rights and transitional justice. These initiatives are powered by the idea of justice, and compliance is deeply dependent on the normative support that the evocation of justice provides. Yet, as they point out, justice is an extremely vague and unspecified concept, however powerful. Most people agree that they want justice but have far greater difficulty deciding which dictator of what country should be tried and whether he should be killed for which offenses. It is, as Goodale and Clarke say, the very aspirational quality and substantive openness of the concept of justice that gives it its power. In this regard, the idea of justice differs sharply from that of human rights, which has an elaborate set of legal texts and procedures such as conventions, treaty bodies, complaint mechanisms, and civil society organizations that ferret out abuses and translate them into human rights terms that are recognizable to these international institutions. Human rights specify relatively clearly what justice is and what procedures will produce it. If we ponder the sources of ideas of justice, however, we realize that they are multiple and hardly all grounded in human rights. Responding to the challenge that Goodale and Clarke pose in the introduction, it seems that we are able to identify at least four discrete sources of justice ideas.",
    author = "Sally Merry",
    year = "2009",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511657511.003",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9780521195379",
    pages = "28--42",
    booktitle = "Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Beyond compliance

    T2 - Toward an anthropological understanding of international justice

    AU - Merry, Sally

    PY - 2009/1/1

    Y1 - 2009/1/1

    N2 - In this volume, Mark Goodale and Kamari Clarke courageously tackle the question of the meanings of justice in a world that is exploding with interest in human rights and transitional justice. These initiatives are powered by the idea of justice, and compliance is deeply dependent on the normative support that the evocation of justice provides. Yet, as they point out, justice is an extremely vague and unspecified concept, however powerful. Most people agree that they want justice but have far greater difficulty deciding which dictator of what country should be tried and whether he should be killed for which offenses. It is, as Goodale and Clarke say, the very aspirational quality and substantive openness of the concept of justice that gives it its power. In this regard, the idea of justice differs sharply from that of human rights, which has an elaborate set of legal texts and procedures such as conventions, treaty bodies, complaint mechanisms, and civil society organizations that ferret out abuses and translate them into human rights terms that are recognizable to these international institutions. Human rights specify relatively clearly what justice is and what procedures will produce it. If we ponder the sources of ideas of justice, however, we realize that they are multiple and hardly all grounded in human rights. Responding to the challenge that Goodale and Clarke pose in the introduction, it seems that we are able to identify at least four discrete sources of justice ideas.

    AB - In this volume, Mark Goodale and Kamari Clarke courageously tackle the question of the meanings of justice in a world that is exploding with interest in human rights and transitional justice. These initiatives are powered by the idea of justice, and compliance is deeply dependent on the normative support that the evocation of justice provides. Yet, as they point out, justice is an extremely vague and unspecified concept, however powerful. Most people agree that they want justice but have far greater difficulty deciding which dictator of what country should be tried and whether he should be killed for which offenses. It is, as Goodale and Clarke say, the very aspirational quality and substantive openness of the concept of justice that gives it its power. In this regard, the idea of justice differs sharply from that of human rights, which has an elaborate set of legal texts and procedures such as conventions, treaty bodies, complaint mechanisms, and civil society organizations that ferret out abuses and translate them into human rights terms that are recognizable to these international institutions. Human rights specify relatively clearly what justice is and what procedures will produce it. If we ponder the sources of ideas of justice, however, we realize that they are multiple and hardly all grounded in human rights. Responding to the challenge that Goodale and Clarke pose in the introduction, it seems that we are able to identify at least four discrete sources of justice ideas.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928436227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928436227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511657511.003

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511657511.003

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9780521195379

    SP - 28

    EP - 42

    BT - Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post-Cold War Era

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -