Between the state and the market: Can informal insurance patch the safety net?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Most households in low-income countries deal with economic hardships through informal insurance arrangements between individuals and communities rather than through publicly managed programs or market-provided insurance schemes. Households may, for example, draw on savings, sell physical assets, rely on reciprocal gift exchanges, or diversify into alternative income-generating activities. These mechanisms can be highly effective in the right circumstances, but most recent studies show that informal insurance arrangements are often weak. Poor households, in particular, have substantial difficulties coping with even local, idiosyncratic risks. Public policy can help reduce vulnerability by encouraging private, flexible coping mechanisms while discouraging those that are fragile or that hinder economic and social mobility. Promising policies include creating self-regulating workfare programs and providing a supportive setting for institutions working to improve access to credit, crop and health insurance, and safe and convenient saving opportunities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-207
Number of pages21
JournalWorld Bank Research Observer
Volume14
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 1999

Fingerprint

insurance
safety
market
coping
income
workfare
health insurance
Social Mobility
gift
economics
savings
credit
assets
vulnerability
low income
public policy
crop
community
household
Informal insurance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Development

Cite this

Between the state and the market : Can informal insurance patch the safety net? / Morduch, Jonathan.

In: World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 14, No. 2, 08.1999, p. 187-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{182622fab945415d92651329cd6a6f2b,
title = "Between the state and the market: Can informal insurance patch the safety net?",
abstract = "Most households in low-income countries deal with economic hardships through informal insurance arrangements between individuals and communities rather than through publicly managed programs or market-provided insurance schemes. Households may, for example, draw on savings, sell physical assets, rely on reciprocal gift exchanges, or diversify into alternative income-generating activities. These mechanisms can be highly effective in the right circumstances, but most recent studies show that informal insurance arrangements are often weak. Poor households, in particular, have substantial difficulties coping with even local, idiosyncratic risks. Public policy can help reduce vulnerability by encouraging private, flexible coping mechanisms while discouraging those that are fragile or that hinder economic and social mobility. Promising policies include creating self-regulating workfare programs and providing a supportive setting for institutions working to improve access to credit, crop and health insurance, and safe and convenient saving opportunities.",
author = "Jonathan Morduch",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "187--207",
journal = "World Bank Research Observer",
issn = "0257-3032",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between the state and the market

T2 - Can informal insurance patch the safety net?

AU - Morduch, Jonathan

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - Most households in low-income countries deal with economic hardships through informal insurance arrangements between individuals and communities rather than through publicly managed programs or market-provided insurance schemes. Households may, for example, draw on savings, sell physical assets, rely on reciprocal gift exchanges, or diversify into alternative income-generating activities. These mechanisms can be highly effective in the right circumstances, but most recent studies show that informal insurance arrangements are often weak. Poor households, in particular, have substantial difficulties coping with even local, idiosyncratic risks. Public policy can help reduce vulnerability by encouraging private, flexible coping mechanisms while discouraging those that are fragile or that hinder economic and social mobility. Promising policies include creating self-regulating workfare programs and providing a supportive setting for institutions working to improve access to credit, crop and health insurance, and safe and convenient saving opportunities.

AB - Most households in low-income countries deal with economic hardships through informal insurance arrangements between individuals and communities rather than through publicly managed programs or market-provided insurance schemes. Households may, for example, draw on savings, sell physical assets, rely on reciprocal gift exchanges, or diversify into alternative income-generating activities. These mechanisms can be highly effective in the right circumstances, but most recent studies show that informal insurance arrangements are often weak. Poor households, in particular, have substantial difficulties coping with even local, idiosyncratic risks. Public policy can help reduce vulnerability by encouraging private, flexible coping mechanisms while discouraging those that are fragile or that hinder economic and social mobility. Promising policies include creating self-regulating workfare programs and providing a supportive setting for institutions working to improve access to credit, crop and health insurance, and safe and convenient saving opportunities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033385057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033385057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033385057

VL - 14

SP - 187

EP - 207

JO - World Bank Research Observer

JF - World Bank Research Observer

SN - 0257-3032

IS - 2

ER -