Better than Raw: A Guide to Measuring Organizational Performance with Adjusted Performance Measures

Ross Rubenstein, Amy Ellen Schwartz, Leanna Stiefel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Like oysters on the half shell, some things are better when they're raw. In evaluating the performance of organizations and providing guidance for improving performance, however, raw performance measures, such as test scores or success rates, are often inferior to performance measures adjusted for client and environmental characteristics, or adjusted performance measures (APMs). Using examples from a variety of public services and data on public schools in Georgia, we compare the performance data generated by raw scores and by APMs. We conclude with guidance for constructing and using adjusted performance measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)607-615
Number of pages9
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume63
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2003

Fingerprint

performance
Organizational performance
Performance measures
public service
Guidance
school
Test scores
Shell
Public services
Public schools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Better than Raw : A Guide to Measuring Organizational Performance with Adjusted Performance Measures. / Rubenstein, Ross; Schwartz, Amy Ellen; Stiefel, Leanna.

In: Public Administration Review, Vol. 63, No. 5, 09.2003, p. 607-615.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{d8922d7d93c04c9093f790e873dff684,
title = "Better than Raw: A Guide to Measuring Organizational Performance with Adjusted Performance Measures",
abstract = "Like oysters on the half shell, some things are better when they're raw. In evaluating the performance of organizations and providing guidance for improving performance, however, raw performance measures, such as test scores or success rates, are often inferior to performance measures adjusted for client and environmental characteristics, or adjusted performance measures (APMs). Using examples from a variety of public services and data on public schools in Georgia, we compare the performance data generated by raw scores and by APMs. We conclude with guidance for constructing and using adjusted performance measures.",
author = "Ross Rubenstein and Schwartz, {Amy Ellen} and Leanna Stiefel",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "607--615",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Better than Raw

T2 - A Guide to Measuring Organizational Performance with Adjusted Performance Measures

AU - Rubenstein, Ross

AU - Schwartz, Amy Ellen

AU - Stiefel, Leanna

PY - 2003/9

Y1 - 2003/9

N2 - Like oysters on the half shell, some things are better when they're raw. In evaluating the performance of organizations and providing guidance for improving performance, however, raw performance measures, such as test scores or success rates, are often inferior to performance measures adjusted for client and environmental characteristics, or adjusted performance measures (APMs). Using examples from a variety of public services and data on public schools in Georgia, we compare the performance data generated by raw scores and by APMs. We conclude with guidance for constructing and using adjusted performance measures.

AB - Like oysters on the half shell, some things are better when they're raw. In evaluating the performance of organizations and providing guidance for improving performance, however, raw performance measures, such as test scores or success rates, are often inferior to performance measures adjusted for client and environmental characteristics, or adjusted performance measures (APMs). Using examples from a variety of public services and data on public schools in Georgia, we compare the performance data generated by raw scores and by APMs. We conclude with guidance for constructing and using adjusted performance measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142028859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142028859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0142028859

VL - 63

SP - 607

EP - 615

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - 5

ER -