Best practices and inclusion of team science principles in appointment promotion and tenure documents in research intensive schools of nursing

Abraham Brody, Ashley Leak Bryant, G. Adriana Perez, Donald E. Bailey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Nurse scientists are highly sought after and find satisfaction in serving as members of interdisciplinary research teams. These teams also tend to be highly productive. However, nurse scientists in academia also have to reach certain productivity milestones to be promoted and receive tenure that may be incongruent with team science principles. Purpose: This study therefore sought to examine whether APT documents in research intensive nursing schools incorporate team science principles. Methods: Qualitatively analyzed the appointment, promotion and tenure documents of 18 U.S. based research intensive schools of nursing with over $2 million in NIH funding in fiscal year 2014. Results: The study found that only 8 of 18 documents included any reference to team science principles and even these mentions were largely negligible. There were few best practices to recommend across documents. By not recognizing team science within these documents, nursing risks marginalization within the larger scientific community by limiting mentorship and learning opportunities for early career nurse scientists. Conclusions: Schools of nursing should revisit their promotion and tenure criteria and include a greater commitment to encouragement of team science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNursing Outlook
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

School Nursing
Practice Guidelines
Appointments and Schedules
Research
Nurses
Nursing Schools
Mentors
Nursing
Learning
Efficiency

Keywords

  • Academic nursing
  • Appointment promotion and tenure
  • Interprofessional
  • Nursing research
  • Team science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Best practices and inclusion of team science principles in appointment promotion and tenure documents in research intensive schools of nursing. / Brody, Abraham; Bryant, Ashley Leak; Perez, G. Adriana; Bailey, Donald E.

In: Nursing Outlook, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d734140ae2924322887793080044b54a,
title = "Best practices and inclusion of team science principles in appointment promotion and tenure documents in research intensive schools of nursing",
abstract = "Background: Nurse scientists are highly sought after and find satisfaction in serving as members of interdisciplinary research teams. These teams also tend to be highly productive. However, nurse scientists in academia also have to reach certain productivity milestones to be promoted and receive tenure that may be incongruent with team science principles. Purpose: This study therefore sought to examine whether APT documents in research intensive nursing schools incorporate team science principles. Methods: Qualitatively analyzed the appointment, promotion and tenure documents of 18 U.S. based research intensive schools of nursing with over $2 million in NIH funding in fiscal year 2014. Results: The study found that only 8 of 18 documents included any reference to team science principles and even these mentions were largely negligible. There were few best practices to recommend across documents. By not recognizing team science within these documents, nursing risks marginalization within the larger scientific community by limiting mentorship and learning opportunities for early career nurse scientists. Conclusions: Schools of nursing should revisit their promotion and tenure criteria and include a greater commitment to encouragement of team science.",
keywords = "Academic nursing, Appointment promotion and tenure, Interprofessional, Nursing research, Team science",
author = "Abraham Brody and Bryant, {Ashley Leak} and Perez, {G. Adriana} and Bailey, {Donald E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.outlook.2018.11.005",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Nursing Outlook",
issn = "0029-6554",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Best practices and inclusion of team science principles in appointment promotion and tenure documents in research intensive schools of nursing

AU - Brody, Abraham

AU - Bryant, Ashley Leak

AU - Perez, G. Adriana

AU - Bailey, Donald E.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Nurse scientists are highly sought after and find satisfaction in serving as members of interdisciplinary research teams. These teams also tend to be highly productive. However, nurse scientists in academia also have to reach certain productivity milestones to be promoted and receive tenure that may be incongruent with team science principles. Purpose: This study therefore sought to examine whether APT documents in research intensive nursing schools incorporate team science principles. Methods: Qualitatively analyzed the appointment, promotion and tenure documents of 18 U.S. based research intensive schools of nursing with over $2 million in NIH funding in fiscal year 2014. Results: The study found that only 8 of 18 documents included any reference to team science principles and even these mentions were largely negligible. There were few best practices to recommend across documents. By not recognizing team science within these documents, nursing risks marginalization within the larger scientific community by limiting mentorship and learning opportunities for early career nurse scientists. Conclusions: Schools of nursing should revisit their promotion and tenure criteria and include a greater commitment to encouragement of team science.

AB - Background: Nurse scientists are highly sought after and find satisfaction in serving as members of interdisciplinary research teams. These teams also tend to be highly productive. However, nurse scientists in academia also have to reach certain productivity milestones to be promoted and receive tenure that may be incongruent with team science principles. Purpose: This study therefore sought to examine whether APT documents in research intensive nursing schools incorporate team science principles. Methods: Qualitatively analyzed the appointment, promotion and tenure documents of 18 U.S. based research intensive schools of nursing with over $2 million in NIH funding in fiscal year 2014. Results: The study found that only 8 of 18 documents included any reference to team science principles and even these mentions were largely negligible. There were few best practices to recommend across documents. By not recognizing team science within these documents, nursing risks marginalization within the larger scientific community by limiting mentorship and learning opportunities for early career nurse scientists. Conclusions: Schools of nursing should revisit their promotion and tenure criteria and include a greater commitment to encouragement of team science.

KW - Academic nursing

KW - Appointment promotion and tenure

KW - Interprofessional

KW - Nursing research

KW - Team science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059178703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059178703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.outlook.2018.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.outlook.2018.11.005

M3 - Article

JO - Nursing Outlook

JF - Nursing Outlook

SN - 0029-6554

ER -