Benchmarking the Dental Implant Evidence on MEDLINE

Stephen P. Russo, Joseph P. Fiorellini, Hans Peter Weber, Richard Niederman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the quantity of dental implant literature available on MEDLINE for evidence-based clinical decision-making and to identify its location. A search strategy based on Medical Subject Headings for dental implants was developed to examine MEDLINE using the Ovid Web Gateway search engine. Sensitive and specific methodologic search filters identified 4 categories of information: etiology, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. The results were then subdivided by year to identify trends and sorted to identify the sources of publications. The searches identified 4,655 articles published in English between 1989 and 1999 on human dental implants on MEDLINE. The mean number of articles (± SD) per year ranged from 15 ± 11 for specific searches to 107 ± 50 for sensitive searches. The number of articles increased by 14% to 43% each year for the sensitive search. When subdivided by clinical category, the mean numbers of articles per year for sensitive and specific searches were, respectively: diagnosis 12 ± 7.5 and 1.5 ± 1.6, etiology 58 ± 33 and 1.9 ± 2.5, therapy 23 ± 15 and 0.3 ± 0.5, and prognosis 67 ± 33 and 12 ± 8.3. Four dental journals account for approximately half of these publications. These results provide 6 key central findings: (1) there appears to be a substantial literature of clinically relevant information on implants upon which to base clinical decisions; (2) the implant literature is significantly biased toward articles addressing prognosis; (3) to stay current, one would need to read between 1 and 2 articles per week 52 weeks per year, and this number increases significantly each year; (4) approximately 50% of the articles were published in 4 journals, whereas the remainder reside in approximately 97 other journals, making it difficult to stay current; (5) these trends reaffirm the need for lifelong learning; (6) these trends also suggest the need for computer-based clinical knowledge systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)792-800
Number of pages9
JournalThe International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants
Volume15
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Dental Implants
MEDLINE
Publications
Medical Subject Headings
Search Engine
Tooth
Learning
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Diagnosis
  • Etiology
  • Implants
  • Prognosis
  • Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Benchmarking the Dental Implant Evidence on MEDLINE. / Russo, Stephen P.; Fiorellini, Joseph P.; Weber, Hans Peter; Niederman, Richard.

In: The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2000, p. 792-800.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Russo, Stephen P. ; Fiorellini, Joseph P. ; Weber, Hans Peter ; Niederman, Richard. / Benchmarking the Dental Implant Evidence on MEDLINE. In: The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2000 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 792-800.
@article{77a62d54b98d419fbffc820e2362d101,
title = "Benchmarking the Dental Implant Evidence on MEDLINE",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to estimate the quantity of dental implant literature available on MEDLINE for evidence-based clinical decision-making and to identify its location. A search strategy based on Medical Subject Headings for dental implants was developed to examine MEDLINE using the Ovid Web Gateway search engine. Sensitive and specific methodologic search filters identified 4 categories of information: etiology, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. The results were then subdivided by year to identify trends and sorted to identify the sources of publications. The searches identified 4,655 articles published in English between 1989 and 1999 on human dental implants on MEDLINE. The mean number of articles (± SD) per year ranged from 15 ± 11 for specific searches to 107 ± 50 for sensitive searches. The number of articles increased by 14{\%} to 43{\%} each year for the sensitive search. When subdivided by clinical category, the mean numbers of articles per year for sensitive and specific searches were, respectively: diagnosis 12 ± 7.5 and 1.5 ± 1.6, etiology 58 ± 33 and 1.9 ± 2.5, therapy 23 ± 15 and 0.3 ± 0.5, and prognosis 67 ± 33 and 12 ± 8.3. Four dental journals account for approximately half of these publications. These results provide 6 key central findings: (1) there appears to be a substantial literature of clinically relevant information on implants upon which to base clinical decisions; (2) the implant literature is significantly biased toward articles addressing prognosis; (3) to stay current, one would need to read between 1 and 2 articles per week 52 weeks per year, and this number increases significantly each year; (4) approximately 50{\%} of the articles were published in 4 journals, whereas the remainder reside in approximately 97 other journals, making it difficult to stay current; (5) these trends reaffirm the need for lifelong learning; (6) these trends also suggest the need for computer-based clinical knowledge systems.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, Diagnosis, Etiology, Implants, Prognosis, Therapeutics",
author = "Russo, {Stephen P.} and Fiorellini, {Joseph P.} and Weber, {Hans Peter} and Richard Niederman",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "792--800",
journal = "International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants",
issn = "0882-2786",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benchmarking the Dental Implant Evidence on MEDLINE

AU - Russo, Stephen P.

AU - Fiorellini, Joseph P.

AU - Weber, Hans Peter

AU - Niederman, Richard

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The purpose of this study was to estimate the quantity of dental implant literature available on MEDLINE for evidence-based clinical decision-making and to identify its location. A search strategy based on Medical Subject Headings for dental implants was developed to examine MEDLINE using the Ovid Web Gateway search engine. Sensitive and specific methodologic search filters identified 4 categories of information: etiology, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. The results were then subdivided by year to identify trends and sorted to identify the sources of publications. The searches identified 4,655 articles published in English between 1989 and 1999 on human dental implants on MEDLINE. The mean number of articles (± SD) per year ranged from 15 ± 11 for specific searches to 107 ± 50 for sensitive searches. The number of articles increased by 14% to 43% each year for the sensitive search. When subdivided by clinical category, the mean numbers of articles per year for sensitive and specific searches were, respectively: diagnosis 12 ± 7.5 and 1.5 ± 1.6, etiology 58 ± 33 and 1.9 ± 2.5, therapy 23 ± 15 and 0.3 ± 0.5, and prognosis 67 ± 33 and 12 ± 8.3. Four dental journals account for approximately half of these publications. These results provide 6 key central findings: (1) there appears to be a substantial literature of clinically relevant information on implants upon which to base clinical decisions; (2) the implant literature is significantly biased toward articles addressing prognosis; (3) to stay current, one would need to read between 1 and 2 articles per week 52 weeks per year, and this number increases significantly each year; (4) approximately 50% of the articles were published in 4 journals, whereas the remainder reside in approximately 97 other journals, making it difficult to stay current; (5) these trends reaffirm the need for lifelong learning; (6) these trends also suggest the need for computer-based clinical knowledge systems.

AB - The purpose of this study was to estimate the quantity of dental implant literature available on MEDLINE for evidence-based clinical decision-making and to identify its location. A search strategy based on Medical Subject Headings for dental implants was developed to examine MEDLINE using the Ovid Web Gateway search engine. Sensitive and specific methodologic search filters identified 4 categories of information: etiology, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. The results were then subdivided by year to identify trends and sorted to identify the sources of publications. The searches identified 4,655 articles published in English between 1989 and 1999 on human dental implants on MEDLINE. The mean number of articles (± SD) per year ranged from 15 ± 11 for specific searches to 107 ± 50 for sensitive searches. The number of articles increased by 14% to 43% each year for the sensitive search. When subdivided by clinical category, the mean numbers of articles per year for sensitive and specific searches were, respectively: diagnosis 12 ± 7.5 and 1.5 ± 1.6, etiology 58 ± 33 and 1.9 ± 2.5, therapy 23 ± 15 and 0.3 ± 0.5, and prognosis 67 ± 33 and 12 ± 8.3. Four dental journals account for approximately half of these publications. These results provide 6 key central findings: (1) there appears to be a substantial literature of clinically relevant information on implants upon which to base clinical decisions; (2) the implant literature is significantly biased toward articles addressing prognosis; (3) to stay current, one would need to read between 1 and 2 articles per week 52 weeks per year, and this number increases significantly each year; (4) approximately 50% of the articles were published in 4 journals, whereas the remainder reside in approximately 97 other journals, making it difficult to stay current; (5) these trends reaffirm the need for lifelong learning; (6) these trends also suggest the need for computer-based clinical knowledge systems.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Etiology

KW - Implants

KW - Prognosis

KW - Therapeutics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034326669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034326669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11151577

AN - SCOPUS:0034326669

VL - 15

SP - 792

EP - 800

JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

SN - 0882-2786

IS - 6

ER -