Belief in a just God (and a just society)

A system justification perspective on religious ideology

John T. Jost, Carlee Beth Hawkins, Brian A. Nosek, Erin P. Hennes, Chadly Stern, Samuel D. Gosling, Jesse Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Theoretical approaches that treat religiosity as an evolutionary byproduct of cognitive mechanisms to detect agency may help to explain the prevalence of superstitious thinking, but they say little about the social-motivational (or ideological) functions of religious beliefs or the specific contents of religious doctrines. To address these omissions, we develop the thesis that religion provides an ideological justification for the existing social order, so that prevailing institutions and arrangements are perceived as legitimate and just, and therefore worth obeying and preserving. We summarize empirical evidence revealing that (a) religiosity is associated with the same set of epistemic, existential, and relational needs that motivate system justification; (b) religiosity is associated with the endorsement of the belief in a just world, Protestant work ethic, fair market ideology, opposition to equality, right-wing authoritarianism, political conservatism, and other system-justifying belief systems; and (c) religious ideology appears to serve the palliative function of making people happier or more satisfied with the way things are. Although most major religious texts and movements contain progressive as well as conservative elements, belief in God is more often than not system-justifying in terms of its motivational antecedents, manifestations, and consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-81
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Religion
Authoritarianism
Politics
Ideology
Justification
Religiosity
Deity
Thinking
Religious Movements
Social Order
By-products
Empirical Evidence
Religious Texts
Doctrine
Conservatism
Work Ethic
Omission
Belief Systems
Equality
Religious Beliefs

Keywords

  • Ideology
  • Religion
  • Social justice
  • System justification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Belief in a just God (and a just society) : A system justification perspective on religious ideology. / Jost, John T.; Hawkins, Carlee Beth; Nosek, Brian A.; Hennes, Erin P.; Stern, Chadly; Gosling, Samuel D.; Graham, Jesse.

In: Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 56-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jost, John T. ; Hawkins, Carlee Beth ; Nosek, Brian A. ; Hennes, Erin P. ; Stern, Chadly ; Gosling, Samuel D. ; Graham, Jesse. / Belief in a just God (and a just society) : A system justification perspective on religious ideology. In: Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 56-81.
@article{073ad4a46b534b44b6a48aea9e1f4a56,
title = "Belief in a just God (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology",
abstract = "Theoretical approaches that treat religiosity as an evolutionary byproduct of cognitive mechanisms to detect agency may help to explain the prevalence of superstitious thinking, but they say little about the social-motivational (or ideological) functions of religious beliefs or the specific contents of religious doctrines. To address these omissions, we develop the thesis that religion provides an ideological justification for the existing social order, so that prevailing institutions and arrangements are perceived as legitimate and just, and therefore worth obeying and preserving. We summarize empirical evidence revealing that (a) religiosity is associated with the same set of epistemic, existential, and relational needs that motivate system justification; (b) religiosity is associated with the endorsement of the belief in a just world, Protestant work ethic, fair market ideology, opposition to equality, right-wing authoritarianism, political conservatism, and other system-justifying belief systems; and (c) religious ideology appears to serve the palliative function of making people happier or more satisfied with the way things are. Although most major religious texts and movements contain progressive as well as conservative elements, belief in God is more often than not system-justifying in terms of its motivational antecedents, manifestations, and consequences.",
keywords = "Ideology, Religion, Social justice, System justification",
author = "Jost, {John T.} and Hawkins, {Carlee Beth} and Nosek, {Brian A.} and Hennes, {Erin P.} and Chadly Stern and Gosling, {Samuel D.} and Jesse Graham",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1037/a0033220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "56--81",
journal = "Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology",
issn = "1068-8471",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Belief in a just God (and a just society)

T2 - A system justification perspective on religious ideology

AU - Jost, John T.

AU - Hawkins, Carlee Beth

AU - Nosek, Brian A.

AU - Hennes, Erin P.

AU - Stern, Chadly

AU - Gosling, Samuel D.

AU - Graham, Jesse

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Theoretical approaches that treat religiosity as an evolutionary byproduct of cognitive mechanisms to detect agency may help to explain the prevalence of superstitious thinking, but they say little about the social-motivational (or ideological) functions of religious beliefs or the specific contents of religious doctrines. To address these omissions, we develop the thesis that religion provides an ideological justification for the existing social order, so that prevailing institutions and arrangements are perceived as legitimate and just, and therefore worth obeying and preserving. We summarize empirical evidence revealing that (a) religiosity is associated with the same set of epistemic, existential, and relational needs that motivate system justification; (b) religiosity is associated with the endorsement of the belief in a just world, Protestant work ethic, fair market ideology, opposition to equality, right-wing authoritarianism, political conservatism, and other system-justifying belief systems; and (c) religious ideology appears to serve the palliative function of making people happier or more satisfied with the way things are. Although most major religious texts and movements contain progressive as well as conservative elements, belief in God is more often than not system-justifying in terms of its motivational antecedents, manifestations, and consequences.

AB - Theoretical approaches that treat religiosity as an evolutionary byproduct of cognitive mechanisms to detect agency may help to explain the prevalence of superstitious thinking, but they say little about the social-motivational (or ideological) functions of religious beliefs or the specific contents of religious doctrines. To address these omissions, we develop the thesis that religion provides an ideological justification for the existing social order, so that prevailing institutions and arrangements are perceived as legitimate and just, and therefore worth obeying and preserving. We summarize empirical evidence revealing that (a) religiosity is associated with the same set of epistemic, existential, and relational needs that motivate system justification; (b) religiosity is associated with the endorsement of the belief in a just world, Protestant work ethic, fair market ideology, opposition to equality, right-wing authoritarianism, political conservatism, and other system-justifying belief systems; and (c) religious ideology appears to serve the palliative function of making people happier or more satisfied with the way things are. Although most major religious texts and movements contain progressive as well as conservative elements, belief in God is more often than not system-justifying in terms of its motivational antecedents, manifestations, and consequences.

KW - Ideology

KW - Religion

KW - Social justice

KW - System justification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893674102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893674102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0033220

DO - 10.1037/a0033220

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 56

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology

JF - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology

SN - 1068-8471

IS - 1

ER -