Belief elicitation in the laboratory

Andrew Schotter, Isabel Trevino

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    One constraint we face as economists is not being able to observe all the relevant variables required to test our theories or make policy prescriptions. Laboratory techniques allow us to convert many variables (such as beliefs) that are unobservable in the field into observables. This article presents a survey of the literature on belief elicitation in laboratory experimental economics. We discuss several techniques available to elicit beliefs in an incentive-compatible manner and the problems involved in their use. We then look at how successful these techniques have been when employed in laboratory studies. We find that despite some problems, beliefs elicited in the laboratory are meaningful (i.e., they are generally used as the basis for behavior), and the process of eliciting beliefs seems not to be too intrusive. One hope for the future is that by eliciting beliefs, we may be able to develop better theories of belief formation.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)103-128
    Number of pages26
    JournalAnnual Review of Economics
    Volume6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Experimental economics
    Incentive compatible
    Economists
    Prescription

    Keywords

    • decision theory
    • experiments

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Belief elicitation in the laboratory. / Schotter, Andrew; Trevino, Isabel.

    In: Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 6, 2014, p. 103-128.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Schotter, Andrew ; Trevino, Isabel. / Belief elicitation in the laboratory. In: Annual Review of Economics. 2014 ; Vol. 6. pp. 103-128.
    @article{84abfaede35546e79e36fa53e517ee36,
    title = "Belief elicitation in the laboratory",
    abstract = "One constraint we face as economists is not being able to observe all the relevant variables required to test our theories or make policy prescriptions. Laboratory techniques allow us to convert many variables (such as beliefs) that are unobservable in the field into observables. This article presents a survey of the literature on belief elicitation in laboratory experimental economics. We discuss several techniques available to elicit beliefs in an incentive-compatible manner and the problems involved in their use. We then look at how successful these techniques have been when employed in laboratory studies. We find that despite some problems, beliefs elicited in the laboratory are meaningful (i.e., they are generally used as the basis for behavior), and the process of eliciting beliefs seems not to be too intrusive. One hope for the future is that by eliciting beliefs, we may be able to develop better theories of belief formation.",
    keywords = "decision theory, experiments",
    author = "Andrew Schotter and Isabel Trevino",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040927",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "6",
    pages = "103--128",
    journal = "Annual Review of Economics",
    issn = "1941-1383",
    publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Belief elicitation in the laboratory

    AU - Schotter, Andrew

    AU - Trevino, Isabel

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - One constraint we face as economists is not being able to observe all the relevant variables required to test our theories or make policy prescriptions. Laboratory techniques allow us to convert many variables (such as beliefs) that are unobservable in the field into observables. This article presents a survey of the literature on belief elicitation in laboratory experimental economics. We discuss several techniques available to elicit beliefs in an incentive-compatible manner and the problems involved in their use. We then look at how successful these techniques have been when employed in laboratory studies. We find that despite some problems, beliefs elicited in the laboratory are meaningful (i.e., they are generally used as the basis for behavior), and the process of eliciting beliefs seems not to be too intrusive. One hope for the future is that by eliciting beliefs, we may be able to develop better theories of belief formation.

    AB - One constraint we face as economists is not being able to observe all the relevant variables required to test our theories or make policy prescriptions. Laboratory techniques allow us to convert many variables (such as beliefs) that are unobservable in the field into observables. This article presents a survey of the literature on belief elicitation in laboratory experimental economics. We discuss several techniques available to elicit beliefs in an incentive-compatible manner and the problems involved in their use. We then look at how successful these techniques have been when employed in laboratory studies. We find that despite some problems, beliefs elicited in the laboratory are meaningful (i.e., they are generally used as the basis for behavior), and the process of eliciting beliefs seems not to be too intrusive. One hope for the future is that by eliciting beliefs, we may be able to develop better theories of belief formation.

    KW - decision theory

    KW - experiments

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905678588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905678588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040927

    DO - 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040927

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84905678588

    VL - 6

    SP - 103

    EP - 128

    JO - Annual Review of Economics

    JF - Annual Review of Economics

    SN - 1941-1383

    ER -