Beauty at a glance: The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration

Aenne A. Brielmann, Lauren Vale, Denis Pelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over time, how does beauty develop and decay? Common sense suggests that beauty is intensely felt only after prolonged experience of the object. Here, we present one of various stimuli for a variable duration (1- 30 s), measure the observers' pleasure over time, and, finally, ask whether they felt beauty. On each trial, participants (N = 21) either see an image that they had chosen as ''movingly beautiful,'' see an image with prerated valence, or suck a candy. During the stimulus and a further 60 s, participants rate pleasure continuously using a custom touchscreen web app, EmotionTracker.com. After each trial, participants judge whether they felt beauty. Across all stimulus kinds, durations, and beauty responses, the dynamic pleasure rating has a stereotypical time course that is well fit by a one-parameter model with a brief exponential onset (roughly 2.5 s), a sustained plateau during stimulus presentation, and a long exponential decay (roughly 70 s). Across conditions, only the plateau amplitude varies. Beauty and pleasure amplitude are nearly independent of stimulus duration. The final beauty rating is positively correlated with pleasure amplitude (r=0.60), and nearly independent of duration (r = 0.10). Beauty's independence from duration is unlike Bentham's 18thcentury notion of value (utility), which he supposed to depend on the product of pleasure amplitude and duration. Participants report having felt pleasure as strongly after a mere 1 s stimulus as after longer durations, up to 30 s. Thus, we find that amplitude of pleasure is independent of stimulus duration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number9
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume17
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Beauty
Pleasure
Emotions
Candy

Keywords

  • Aesthetics
  • Beauty
  • Pleasure
  • Stimulus duration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Beauty at a glance : The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration. / Brielmann, Aenne A.; Vale, Lauren; Pelli, Denis.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 17, No. 14, 9, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a8321f60b9a444aaa442ed0c8c78a21,
title = "Beauty at a glance: The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration",
abstract = "Over time, how does beauty develop and decay? Common sense suggests that beauty is intensely felt only after prolonged experience of the object. Here, we present one of various stimuli for a variable duration (1- 30 s), measure the observers' pleasure over time, and, finally, ask whether they felt beauty. On each trial, participants (N = 21) either see an image that they had chosen as ''movingly beautiful,'' see an image with prerated valence, or suck a candy. During the stimulus and a further 60 s, participants rate pleasure continuously using a custom touchscreen web app, EmotionTracker.com. After each trial, participants judge whether they felt beauty. Across all stimulus kinds, durations, and beauty responses, the dynamic pleasure rating has a stereotypical time course that is well fit by a one-parameter model with a brief exponential onset (roughly 2.5 s), a sustained plateau during stimulus presentation, and a long exponential decay (roughly 70 s). Across conditions, only the plateau amplitude varies. Beauty and pleasure amplitude are nearly independent of stimulus duration. The final beauty rating is positively correlated with pleasure amplitude (r=0.60), and nearly independent of duration (r = 0.10). Beauty's independence from duration is unlike Bentham's 18thcentury notion of value (utility), which he supposed to depend on the product of pleasure amplitude and duration. Participants report having felt pleasure as strongly after a mere 1 s stimulus as after longer durations, up to 30 s. Thus, we find that amplitude of pleasure is independent of stimulus duration.",
keywords = "Aesthetics, Beauty, Pleasure, Stimulus duration",
author = "Brielmann, {Aenne A.} and Lauren Vale and Denis Pelli",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/17.14.9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beauty at a glance

T2 - The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration

AU - Brielmann, Aenne A.

AU - Vale, Lauren

AU - Pelli, Denis

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Over time, how does beauty develop and decay? Common sense suggests that beauty is intensely felt only after prolonged experience of the object. Here, we present one of various stimuli for a variable duration (1- 30 s), measure the observers' pleasure over time, and, finally, ask whether they felt beauty. On each trial, participants (N = 21) either see an image that they had chosen as ''movingly beautiful,'' see an image with prerated valence, or suck a candy. During the stimulus and a further 60 s, participants rate pleasure continuously using a custom touchscreen web app, EmotionTracker.com. After each trial, participants judge whether they felt beauty. Across all stimulus kinds, durations, and beauty responses, the dynamic pleasure rating has a stereotypical time course that is well fit by a one-parameter model with a brief exponential onset (roughly 2.5 s), a sustained plateau during stimulus presentation, and a long exponential decay (roughly 70 s). Across conditions, only the plateau amplitude varies. Beauty and pleasure amplitude are nearly independent of stimulus duration. The final beauty rating is positively correlated with pleasure amplitude (r=0.60), and nearly independent of duration (r = 0.10). Beauty's independence from duration is unlike Bentham's 18thcentury notion of value (utility), which he supposed to depend on the product of pleasure amplitude and duration. Participants report having felt pleasure as strongly after a mere 1 s stimulus as after longer durations, up to 30 s. Thus, we find that amplitude of pleasure is independent of stimulus duration.

AB - Over time, how does beauty develop and decay? Common sense suggests that beauty is intensely felt only after prolonged experience of the object. Here, we present one of various stimuli for a variable duration (1- 30 s), measure the observers' pleasure over time, and, finally, ask whether they felt beauty. On each trial, participants (N = 21) either see an image that they had chosen as ''movingly beautiful,'' see an image with prerated valence, or suck a candy. During the stimulus and a further 60 s, participants rate pleasure continuously using a custom touchscreen web app, EmotionTracker.com. After each trial, participants judge whether they felt beauty. Across all stimulus kinds, durations, and beauty responses, the dynamic pleasure rating has a stereotypical time course that is well fit by a one-parameter model with a brief exponential onset (roughly 2.5 s), a sustained plateau during stimulus presentation, and a long exponential decay (roughly 70 s). Across conditions, only the plateau amplitude varies. Beauty and pleasure amplitude are nearly independent of stimulus duration. The final beauty rating is positively correlated with pleasure amplitude (r=0.60), and nearly independent of duration (r = 0.10). Beauty's independence from duration is unlike Bentham's 18thcentury notion of value (utility), which he supposed to depend on the product of pleasure amplitude and duration. Participants report having felt pleasure as strongly after a mere 1 s stimulus as after longer durations, up to 30 s. Thus, we find that amplitude of pleasure is independent of stimulus duration.

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Beauty

KW - Pleasure

KW - Stimulus duration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037861151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037861151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/17.14.9

DO - 10.1167/17.14.9

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 14

M1 - 9

ER -