Basic-level superiority in picture categorization

Gregory Murphy, Edward E. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a seminal paper, E. Rosch, C. B. Mervis, W. D. Gray, D. M. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem (Cognitive Psychology, 1976, 8, 382-439) found that an object can be categorized faster at the basic level (e.g., hammer) than at either a subordinate (club hammer) or a superordinate level (tool); they attributed this result to basic categories having more distinctive attributes. But numerous factors other than the number of distinctive attributes might have caused this result; for example, basic categories routinely have shorter and more frequent names than do subordinates, and are typically learned earlier and occur more often than either subordinate or superordinate categories. In this paper, we report three experiments, all of which used artificial subordinate, basic, and superordinate categories, and all of which either held constant or systematically varied several of these "other" factors. All three studies replicated the finding that objects can be categorized fastest at the basic level (but the relative speeds of subordinate and superordinate categorizations differed from past results); and all three strongly supported the claim that distinctive attributes are the factor underlying the results, though it appears that only perceptual attributes are critical.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1982

Fingerprint

Hammers
Names
Psychology
club
psychology
Experiments
Superiority
experiment

Cite this

Basic-level superiority in picture categorization. / Murphy, Gregory; Smith, Edward E.

In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1982, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murphy, Gregory ; Smith, Edward E. / Basic-level superiority in picture categorization. In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1982 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 1-20.
@article{dbbffab76445473cb013e99b27f10aa8,
title = "Basic-level superiority in picture categorization",
abstract = "In a seminal paper, E. Rosch, C. B. Mervis, W. D. Gray, D. M. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem (Cognitive Psychology, 1976, 8, 382-439) found that an object can be categorized faster at the basic level (e.g., hammer) than at either a subordinate (club hammer) or a superordinate level (tool); they attributed this result to basic categories having more distinctive attributes. But numerous factors other than the number of distinctive attributes might have caused this result; for example, basic categories routinely have shorter and more frequent names than do subordinates, and are typically learned earlier and occur more often than either subordinate or superordinate categories. In this paper, we report three experiments, all of which used artificial subordinate, basic, and superordinate categories, and all of which either held constant or systematically varied several of these {"}other{"} factors. All three studies replicated the finding that objects can be categorized fastest at the basic level (but the relative speeds of subordinate and superordinate categorizations differed from past results); and all three strongly supported the claim that distinctive attributes are the factor underlying the results, though it appears that only perceptual attributes are critical.",
author = "Gregory Murphy and Smith, {Edward E.}",
year = "1982",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90412-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Basic-level superiority in picture categorization

AU - Murphy, Gregory

AU - Smith, Edward E.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - In a seminal paper, E. Rosch, C. B. Mervis, W. D. Gray, D. M. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem (Cognitive Psychology, 1976, 8, 382-439) found that an object can be categorized faster at the basic level (e.g., hammer) than at either a subordinate (club hammer) or a superordinate level (tool); they attributed this result to basic categories having more distinctive attributes. But numerous factors other than the number of distinctive attributes might have caused this result; for example, basic categories routinely have shorter and more frequent names than do subordinates, and are typically learned earlier and occur more often than either subordinate or superordinate categories. In this paper, we report three experiments, all of which used artificial subordinate, basic, and superordinate categories, and all of which either held constant or systematically varied several of these "other" factors. All three studies replicated the finding that objects can be categorized fastest at the basic level (but the relative speeds of subordinate and superordinate categorizations differed from past results); and all three strongly supported the claim that distinctive attributes are the factor underlying the results, though it appears that only perceptual attributes are critical.

AB - In a seminal paper, E. Rosch, C. B. Mervis, W. D. Gray, D. M. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem (Cognitive Psychology, 1976, 8, 382-439) found that an object can be categorized faster at the basic level (e.g., hammer) than at either a subordinate (club hammer) or a superordinate level (tool); they attributed this result to basic categories having more distinctive attributes. But numerous factors other than the number of distinctive attributes might have caused this result; for example, basic categories routinely have shorter and more frequent names than do subordinates, and are typically learned earlier and occur more often than either subordinate or superordinate categories. In this paper, we report three experiments, all of which used artificial subordinate, basic, and superordinate categories, and all of which either held constant or systematically varied several of these "other" factors. All three studies replicated the finding that objects can be categorized fastest at the basic level (but the relative speeds of subordinate and superordinate categorizations differed from past results); and all three strongly supported the claim that distinctive attributes are the factor underlying the results, though it appears that only perceptual attributes are critical.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002973060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002973060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90412-1

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90412-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002973060

VL - 21

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 1

ER -