Balancing rigor against the inherent limitations of investigating hard-to-reach populations

Richard A. Crosby, Laura F. Salazar, Ralph DiClemente, Delia L. Lang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Maintaining rigor in research is critical; however, this need must be balanced by the necessity of conducting studies in populations where inherent barriers exist relative to key issues such as recruitment, attrition, sampling, sample size, assessment techniques, psychometric rigor, the identification of mediators and moderators and the practical relevance of the research question itself. Ultimately, the value of a study in health promotion should be judged on the practicality of the research question within the context of the target population. Striking the perfect balance between rigor and practicality to the field is a question that health promotion researchers and professionals need to determine through ongoing dialogue and debate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalHealth Education Research
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010

Fingerprint

Health Promotion
health promotion
Research
Population
Health Services Needs and Demand
moderator
Psychometrics
Sample Size
psychometrics
dialogue
Research Personnel
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Balancing rigor against the inherent limitations of investigating hard-to-reach populations. / Crosby, Richard A.; Salazar, Laura F.; DiClemente, Ralph; Lang, Delia L.

In: Health Education Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.02.2010, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crosby, Richard A. ; Salazar, Laura F. ; DiClemente, Ralph ; Lang, Delia L. / Balancing rigor against the inherent limitations of investigating hard-to-reach populations. In: Health Education Research. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 1-5.
@article{f7645b9c404c49d99de212656396fe91,
title = "Balancing rigor against the inherent limitations of investigating hard-to-reach populations",
abstract = "Maintaining rigor in research is critical; however, this need must be balanced by the necessity of conducting studies in populations where inherent barriers exist relative to key issues such as recruitment, attrition, sampling, sample size, assessment techniques, psychometric rigor, the identification of mediators and moderators and the practical relevance of the research question itself. Ultimately, the value of a study in health promotion should be judged on the practicality of the research question within the context of the target population. Striking the perfect balance between rigor and practicality to the field is a question that health promotion researchers and professionals need to determine through ongoing dialogue and debate.",
author = "Crosby, {Richard A.} and Salazar, {Laura F.} and Ralph DiClemente and Lang, {Delia L.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/her/cyp062",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Health Education Research",
issn = "0268-1153",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing rigor against the inherent limitations of investigating hard-to-reach populations

AU - Crosby, Richard A.

AU - Salazar, Laura F.

AU - DiClemente, Ralph

AU - Lang, Delia L.

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - Maintaining rigor in research is critical; however, this need must be balanced by the necessity of conducting studies in populations where inherent barriers exist relative to key issues such as recruitment, attrition, sampling, sample size, assessment techniques, psychometric rigor, the identification of mediators and moderators and the practical relevance of the research question itself. Ultimately, the value of a study in health promotion should be judged on the practicality of the research question within the context of the target population. Striking the perfect balance between rigor and practicality to the field is a question that health promotion researchers and professionals need to determine through ongoing dialogue and debate.

AB - Maintaining rigor in research is critical; however, this need must be balanced by the necessity of conducting studies in populations where inherent barriers exist relative to key issues such as recruitment, attrition, sampling, sample size, assessment techniques, psychometric rigor, the identification of mediators and moderators and the practical relevance of the research question itself. Ultimately, the value of a study in health promotion should be judged on the practicality of the research question within the context of the target population. Striking the perfect balance between rigor and practicality to the field is a question that health promotion researchers and professionals need to determine through ongoing dialogue and debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75649114905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75649114905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/her/cyp062

DO - 10.1093/her/cyp062

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Health Education Research

JF - Health Education Research

SN - 0268-1153

IS - 1

ER -