Awareness and use of untested barrier methods by HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men

R. J. Wolitski, P. N. Halkitis, J. T. Parsons, C. A. Gómez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Little is known about HIV-seropositive men's awareness and use of untested barrier methods during anal intercourse. A sample of 240 HIV-seropositive men (69.2% men of color) completed a self-administered survey that included items on nonoxynol-9 (N-9), female condoms, and the simultaneous use of two male condoms (double bagging). Most participants (79.6%) had heard of N-9 being used to prevent HIV transmission during anal intercourse. Of these, 20.0% rated N-9 as more effective than condoms, and 14.6% had used N-9 instead of condoms. Fewer men (35.4%) were aware of female condoms being used during anal intercourse. Overall, few respondents (5.4%) had used female condoms; 53.8% of whom rated the device as more pleasurable than male condoms. Most men (69.6%) had heard of double bagging, and 35.2% had engaged in this practice. Of these, 45.1% rated the practice as less pleasurable than using a single condom. Few associations were observed between participant characteristics and the awareness or use of these barrier methods. The widespread use of these untested methods emphasizes the urgent need to further educate HIV-seropositive men about the potential risks of N-9 use and to test the effectiveness of other strategies that may serve as alternatives to male condom use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-301
Number of pages11
JournalAIDS Education and Prevention
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Condoms
Female Condoms
HIV
Nonoxynol
Sexual Minorities
Color
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Awareness and use of untested barrier methods by HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men. / Wolitski, R. J.; Halkitis, P. N.; Parsons, J. T.; Gómez, C. A.

In: AIDS Education and Prevention, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2001, p. 291-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wolitski, R. J. ; Halkitis, P. N. ; Parsons, J. T. ; Gómez, C. A. / Awareness and use of untested barrier methods by HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men. In: AIDS Education and Prevention. 2001 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 291-301.
@article{6d5313ba2c5942ba82b9b6c6d40c7998,
title = "Awareness and use of untested barrier methods by HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men",
abstract = "Little is known about HIV-seropositive men's awareness and use of untested barrier methods during anal intercourse. A sample of 240 HIV-seropositive men (69.2{\%} men of color) completed a self-administered survey that included items on nonoxynol-9 (N-9), female condoms, and the simultaneous use of two male condoms (double bagging). Most participants (79.6{\%}) had heard of N-9 being used to prevent HIV transmission during anal intercourse. Of these, 20.0{\%} rated N-9 as more effective than condoms, and 14.6{\%} had used N-9 instead of condoms. Fewer men (35.4{\%}) were aware of female condoms being used during anal intercourse. Overall, few respondents (5.4{\%}) had used female condoms; 53.8{\%} of whom rated the device as more pleasurable than male condoms. Most men (69.6{\%}) had heard of double bagging, and 35.2{\%} had engaged in this practice. Of these, 45.1{\%} rated the practice as less pleasurable than using a single condom. Few associations were observed between participant characteristics and the awareness or use of these barrier methods. The widespread use of these untested methods emphasizes the urgent need to further educate HIV-seropositive men about the potential risks of N-9 use and to test the effectiveness of other strategies that may serve as alternatives to male condom use.",
author = "Wolitski, {R. J.} and Halkitis, {P. N.} and Parsons, {J. T.} and G{\'o}mez, {C. A.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1521/aeap.13.4.291.21430",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "291--301",
journal = "AIDS Education and Prevention",
issn = "0899-9546",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Awareness and use of untested barrier methods by HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men

AU - Wolitski, R. J.

AU - Halkitis, P. N.

AU - Parsons, J. T.

AU - Gómez, C. A.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Little is known about HIV-seropositive men's awareness and use of untested barrier methods during anal intercourse. A sample of 240 HIV-seropositive men (69.2% men of color) completed a self-administered survey that included items on nonoxynol-9 (N-9), female condoms, and the simultaneous use of two male condoms (double bagging). Most participants (79.6%) had heard of N-9 being used to prevent HIV transmission during anal intercourse. Of these, 20.0% rated N-9 as more effective than condoms, and 14.6% had used N-9 instead of condoms. Fewer men (35.4%) were aware of female condoms being used during anal intercourse. Overall, few respondents (5.4%) had used female condoms; 53.8% of whom rated the device as more pleasurable than male condoms. Most men (69.6%) had heard of double bagging, and 35.2% had engaged in this practice. Of these, 45.1% rated the practice as less pleasurable than using a single condom. Few associations were observed between participant characteristics and the awareness or use of these barrier methods. The widespread use of these untested methods emphasizes the urgent need to further educate HIV-seropositive men about the potential risks of N-9 use and to test the effectiveness of other strategies that may serve as alternatives to male condom use.

AB - Little is known about HIV-seropositive men's awareness and use of untested barrier methods during anal intercourse. A sample of 240 HIV-seropositive men (69.2% men of color) completed a self-administered survey that included items on nonoxynol-9 (N-9), female condoms, and the simultaneous use of two male condoms (double bagging). Most participants (79.6%) had heard of N-9 being used to prevent HIV transmission during anal intercourse. Of these, 20.0% rated N-9 as more effective than condoms, and 14.6% had used N-9 instead of condoms. Fewer men (35.4%) were aware of female condoms being used during anal intercourse. Overall, few respondents (5.4%) had used female condoms; 53.8% of whom rated the device as more pleasurable than male condoms. Most men (69.6%) had heard of double bagging, and 35.2% had engaged in this practice. Of these, 45.1% rated the practice as less pleasurable than using a single condom. Few associations were observed between participant characteristics and the awareness or use of these barrier methods. The widespread use of these untested methods emphasizes the urgent need to further educate HIV-seropositive men about the potential risks of N-9 use and to test the effectiveness of other strategies that may serve as alternatives to male condom use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034853318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034853318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/aeap.13.4.291.21430

DO - 10.1521/aeap.13.4.291.21430

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 291

EP - 301

JO - AIDS Education and Prevention

JF - AIDS Education and Prevention

SN - 0899-9546

IS - 4

ER -