Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation by Subject Specific Modification of Atlas Priors

Marcel Prastawa, Elizabeth Bullitt, Nathan Moon, Koen Van Leemput, Guido Gerig

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Rationale and Objectives. Manual segmentation of brain tumors from magnetic resonance images is a challenging and time-consuming task. An automated system has been developed for brain tumor segmentation that will provide objective, reproducible segmentations that are close to the manual results. Additionally, the method segments white matter, grey matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and edema. The segmentation of pathology and healthy structures is crucial for surgical planning and intervention. Materials and Methods. The method performs the segmentation of a registered set of magnetic resonance images using an expectation-maximization scheme. The segmentation is guided by a spatial probabilistic atlas that contains expert prior knowledge about brain structures. This atlas is modified with the subject-specific brain tumor prior that is computed based on contrast enhancement. Results. Five cases with different types of tumors are selected for evaluation. The results obtained from the automatic segmentation program are compared with results from manual and semi-automated methods. The automated method yields results that have surface distances at roughly 1-4 mm compared with the manual results. Conclusion. The automated method can be applied to different types of tumors. Although its performance is below that of the semi-automated method, it has the advantage of requiring no user supervision.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1341-1348
    Number of pages8
    JournalAcademic Radiology
    Volume10
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2003

    Fingerprint

    Atlases
    Brain Neoplasms
    Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
    Cerebrospinal Fluid
    Edema
    Neoplasms
    Pathology
    Brain

    Keywords

    • Brain tumor segmentation
    • Expectation-maximization
    • Level-set evolution
    • Spatial atlas

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

    Cite this

    Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation by Subject Specific Modification of Atlas Priors. / Prastawa, Marcel; Bullitt, Elizabeth; Moon, Nathan; Van Leemput, Koen; Gerig, Guido.

    In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 10, No. 12, 12.2003, p. 1341-1348.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Prastawa, M, Bullitt, E, Moon, N, Van Leemput, K & Gerig, G 2003, 'Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation by Subject Specific Modification of Atlas Priors', Academic Radiology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1341-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00506-3
    Prastawa, Marcel ; Bullitt, Elizabeth ; Moon, Nathan ; Van Leemput, Koen ; Gerig, Guido. / Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation by Subject Specific Modification of Atlas Priors. In: Academic Radiology. 2003 ; Vol. 10, No. 12. pp. 1341-1348.
    @article{0ec0e62b741f4dc3b25d0d89e05e2d42,
    title = "Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation by Subject Specific Modification of Atlas Priors",
    abstract = "Rationale and Objectives. Manual segmentation of brain tumors from magnetic resonance images is a challenging and time-consuming task. An automated system has been developed for brain tumor segmentation that will provide objective, reproducible segmentations that are close to the manual results. Additionally, the method segments white matter, grey matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and edema. The segmentation of pathology and healthy structures is crucial for surgical planning and intervention. Materials and Methods. The method performs the segmentation of a registered set of magnetic resonance images using an expectation-maximization scheme. The segmentation is guided by a spatial probabilistic atlas that contains expert prior knowledge about brain structures. This atlas is modified with the subject-specific brain tumor prior that is computed based on contrast enhancement. Results. Five cases with different types of tumors are selected for evaluation. The results obtained from the automatic segmentation program are compared with results from manual and semi-automated methods. The automated method yields results that have surface distances at roughly 1-4 mm compared with the manual results. Conclusion. The automated method can be applied to different types of tumors. Although its performance is below that of the semi-automated method, it has the advantage of requiring no user supervision.",
    keywords = "Brain tumor segmentation, Expectation-maximization, Level-set evolution, Spatial atlas",
    author = "Marcel Prastawa and Elizabeth Bullitt and Nathan Moon and {Van Leemput}, Koen and Guido Gerig",
    year = "2003",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00506-3",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "1341--1348",
    journal = "Academic Radiology",
    issn = "1076-6332",
    publisher = "Elsevier USA",
    number = "12",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation by Subject Specific Modification of Atlas Priors

    AU - Prastawa, Marcel

    AU - Bullitt, Elizabeth

    AU - Moon, Nathan

    AU - Van Leemput, Koen

    AU - Gerig, Guido

    PY - 2003/12

    Y1 - 2003/12

    N2 - Rationale and Objectives. Manual segmentation of brain tumors from magnetic resonance images is a challenging and time-consuming task. An automated system has been developed for brain tumor segmentation that will provide objective, reproducible segmentations that are close to the manual results. Additionally, the method segments white matter, grey matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and edema. The segmentation of pathology and healthy structures is crucial for surgical planning and intervention. Materials and Methods. The method performs the segmentation of a registered set of magnetic resonance images using an expectation-maximization scheme. The segmentation is guided by a spatial probabilistic atlas that contains expert prior knowledge about brain structures. This atlas is modified with the subject-specific brain tumor prior that is computed based on contrast enhancement. Results. Five cases with different types of tumors are selected for evaluation. The results obtained from the automatic segmentation program are compared with results from manual and semi-automated methods. The automated method yields results that have surface distances at roughly 1-4 mm compared with the manual results. Conclusion. The automated method can be applied to different types of tumors. Although its performance is below that of the semi-automated method, it has the advantage of requiring no user supervision.

    AB - Rationale and Objectives. Manual segmentation of brain tumors from magnetic resonance images is a challenging and time-consuming task. An automated system has been developed for brain tumor segmentation that will provide objective, reproducible segmentations that are close to the manual results. Additionally, the method segments white matter, grey matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and edema. The segmentation of pathology and healthy structures is crucial for surgical planning and intervention. Materials and Methods. The method performs the segmentation of a registered set of magnetic resonance images using an expectation-maximization scheme. The segmentation is guided by a spatial probabilistic atlas that contains expert prior knowledge about brain structures. This atlas is modified with the subject-specific brain tumor prior that is computed based on contrast enhancement. Results. Five cases with different types of tumors are selected for evaluation. The results obtained from the automatic segmentation program are compared with results from manual and semi-automated methods. The automated method yields results that have surface distances at roughly 1-4 mm compared with the manual results. Conclusion. The automated method can be applied to different types of tumors. Although its performance is below that of the semi-automated method, it has the advantage of requiring no user supervision.

    KW - Brain tumor segmentation

    KW - Expectation-maximization

    KW - Level-set evolution

    KW - Spatial atlas

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347252327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347252327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00506-3

    DO - 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00506-3

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 14697002

    AN - SCOPUS:0347252327

    VL - 10

    SP - 1341

    EP - 1348

    JO - Academic Radiology

    JF - Academic Radiology

    SN - 1076-6332

    IS - 12

    ER -