Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education

Libby Gerard, Camillia Matuk, Kevin McElhaney, Marcia C. Linn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This paper distinguishes features of automated adaptive guidance used in K-12 instructional settings and recommends directions for design. We use meta-analysis to synthesize 24 independent comparisons between automated adaptive guidance and guidance provided during typical teacher-led instruction, and 29 comparisons that isolate the effects of specific adaptive guidance design features in computer-based instruction. We find automated adaptive guidance to be significantly more effective than guidance provided in typical instruction, particularly for students with low prior knowledge. Automated adaptive guidance is most effective when students are generating and integrating ideas (e.g. writing essays, making concept diagrams) as opposed to selecting from the given options. Guidance that promoted self-monitoring was more likely to improve learning outcomes than guidance that addressed only content knowledge. Our findings have implications for researchers who investigate K-12 teaching and learning, designers who create and refine instructional materials using automated guidance, and practitioners who deliver or customize instruction featuring automated guidance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-58
Number of pages18
JournalEducational Research Review
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

instruction
education
learning
student
monitoring
Teaching
teacher
knowledge

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Automated guidance
  • Automated scoring
  • Pre-college education
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education. / Gerard, Libby; Matuk, Camillia; McElhaney, Kevin; Linn, Marcia C.

In: Educational Research Review, Vol. 15, 01.06.2015, p. 41-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gerard, Libby ; Matuk, Camillia ; McElhaney, Kevin ; Linn, Marcia C. / Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education. In: Educational Research Review. 2015 ; Vol. 15. pp. 41-58.
@article{74811c4c355a4cc4925ad98317942ecb,
title = "Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education",
abstract = "This paper distinguishes features of automated adaptive guidance used in K-12 instructional settings and recommends directions for design. We use meta-analysis to synthesize 24 independent comparisons between automated adaptive guidance and guidance provided during typical teacher-led instruction, and 29 comparisons that isolate the effects of specific adaptive guidance design features in computer-based instruction. We find automated adaptive guidance to be significantly more effective than guidance provided in typical instruction, particularly for students with low prior knowledge. Automated adaptive guidance is most effective when students are generating and integrating ideas (e.g. writing essays, making concept diagrams) as opposed to selecting from the given options. Guidance that promoted self-monitoring was more likely to improve learning outcomes than guidance that addressed only content knowledge. Our findings have implications for researchers who investigate K-12 teaching and learning, designers who create and refine instructional materials using automated guidance, and practitioners who deliver or customize instruction featuring automated guidance.",
keywords = "Assessment, Automated guidance, Automated scoring, Pre-college education, Technology",
author = "Libby Gerard and Camillia Matuk and Kevin McElhaney and Linn, {Marcia C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "41--58",
journal = "Educational Research Review",
issn = "1747-938X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education

AU - Gerard, Libby

AU - Matuk, Camillia

AU - McElhaney, Kevin

AU - Linn, Marcia C.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - This paper distinguishes features of automated adaptive guidance used in K-12 instructional settings and recommends directions for design. We use meta-analysis to synthesize 24 independent comparisons between automated adaptive guidance and guidance provided during typical teacher-led instruction, and 29 comparisons that isolate the effects of specific adaptive guidance design features in computer-based instruction. We find automated adaptive guidance to be significantly more effective than guidance provided in typical instruction, particularly for students with low prior knowledge. Automated adaptive guidance is most effective when students are generating and integrating ideas (e.g. writing essays, making concept diagrams) as opposed to selecting from the given options. Guidance that promoted self-monitoring was more likely to improve learning outcomes than guidance that addressed only content knowledge. Our findings have implications for researchers who investigate K-12 teaching and learning, designers who create and refine instructional materials using automated guidance, and practitioners who deliver or customize instruction featuring automated guidance.

AB - This paper distinguishes features of automated adaptive guidance used in K-12 instructional settings and recommends directions for design. We use meta-analysis to synthesize 24 independent comparisons between automated adaptive guidance and guidance provided during typical teacher-led instruction, and 29 comparisons that isolate the effects of specific adaptive guidance design features in computer-based instruction. We find automated adaptive guidance to be significantly more effective than guidance provided in typical instruction, particularly for students with low prior knowledge. Automated adaptive guidance is most effective when students are generating and integrating ideas (e.g. writing essays, making concept diagrams) as opposed to selecting from the given options. Guidance that promoted self-monitoring was more likely to improve learning outcomes than guidance that addressed only content knowledge. Our findings have implications for researchers who investigate K-12 teaching and learning, designers who create and refine instructional materials using automated guidance, and practitioners who deliver or customize instruction featuring automated guidance.

KW - Assessment

KW - Automated guidance

KW - Automated scoring

KW - Pre-college education

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934912399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934912399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.001

M3 - Review article

VL - 15

SP - 41

EP - 58

JO - Educational Research Review

JF - Educational Research Review

SN - 1747-938X

ER -