Auditory recognition of idioms by native and nonnative speakers of English: It takes one to know one

Diana Vanlancker-Sidtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The abilities of second language speakers to discriminate the prosodic contrasts between idiomatic and literal meanings of ambiguous sentences were investigated using utterances previously shown to be reliably identified by acoustic cues. Four listener groups of varying proficiency, native speakers of American English, native speakers of non-American English, fluent nonnative speakers of English, and advanced students of English as a second language (ESL), judged whether single and paired, tape-recorded, literal and idiomatic utterances were spoken with intended idiomatic or literal meanings. Both native speaker groups performed significantly better than fluent nonnatives, while ESL students performed at chance. These results lend support to the hypothesis that abilities to discriminate subtle prosodic contrasts are learned later than other components of speech and language.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-57
Number of pages13
JournalApplied Psycholinguistics
Volume24
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Language
Population Groups
language
Students
North American Indians
ability
Acoustics
listener
acoustics
Cues
Group
student
Recognition (Psychology)
Native Speaker
Idioms
Idiomatics
Hearing
Non-native Speakers of English
Literal Meaning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Auditory recognition of idioms by native and nonnative speakers of English : It takes one to know one. / Vanlancker-Sidtis, Diana.

In: Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 45-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ec905099f5d4b01bfd0589d20ba272c,
title = "Auditory recognition of idioms by native and nonnative speakers of English: It takes one to know one",
abstract = "The abilities of second language speakers to discriminate the prosodic contrasts between idiomatic and literal meanings of ambiguous sentences were investigated using utterances previously shown to be reliably identified by acoustic cues. Four listener groups of varying proficiency, native speakers of American English, native speakers of non-American English, fluent nonnative speakers of English, and advanced students of English as a second language (ESL), judged whether single and paired, tape-recorded, literal and idiomatic utterances were spoken with intended idiomatic or literal meanings. Both native speaker groups performed significantly better than fluent nonnatives, while ESL students performed at chance. These results lend support to the hypothesis that abilities to discriminate subtle prosodic contrasts are learned later than other components of speech and language.",
author = "Diana Vanlancker-Sidtis",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "45--57",
journal = "Applied Psycholinguistics",
issn = "0142-7164",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Auditory recognition of idioms by native and nonnative speakers of English

T2 - It takes one to know one

AU - Vanlancker-Sidtis, Diana

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - The abilities of second language speakers to discriminate the prosodic contrasts between idiomatic and literal meanings of ambiguous sentences were investigated using utterances previously shown to be reliably identified by acoustic cues. Four listener groups of varying proficiency, native speakers of American English, native speakers of non-American English, fluent nonnative speakers of English, and advanced students of English as a second language (ESL), judged whether single and paired, tape-recorded, literal and idiomatic utterances were spoken with intended idiomatic or literal meanings. Both native speaker groups performed significantly better than fluent nonnatives, while ESL students performed at chance. These results lend support to the hypothesis that abilities to discriminate subtle prosodic contrasts are learned later than other components of speech and language.

AB - The abilities of second language speakers to discriminate the prosodic contrasts between idiomatic and literal meanings of ambiguous sentences were investigated using utterances previously shown to be reliably identified by acoustic cues. Four listener groups of varying proficiency, native speakers of American English, native speakers of non-American English, fluent nonnative speakers of English, and advanced students of English as a second language (ESL), judged whether single and paired, tape-recorded, literal and idiomatic utterances were spoken with intended idiomatic or literal meanings. Both native speaker groups performed significantly better than fluent nonnatives, while ESL students performed at chance. These results lend support to the hypothesis that abilities to discriminate subtle prosodic contrasts are learned later than other components of speech and language.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037276430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037276430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 45

EP - 57

JO - Applied Psycholinguistics

JF - Applied Psycholinguistics

SN - 0142-7164

IS - 1

ER -