Attitudes toward retarded children

effects of labeling and academic performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The influence of the label 'mentally retarded' on the attitudes of peers was investigated in 2 independent replications, one with a middle class sample, and the other with a low SES sample. 48 middle class and 40 low SES fourth graders were shown one of two video tapes of two children taking a spelling test. Half of the subjects saw the target actor as being a competent speller, while the remaining half saw him as an incompetent speller. Half of each group was told that the target actor was either a fifth grade pupil, or a mentally retarded boy in a special class. Data from the two sets of 2 x 2 (Label x Competence) replications, indicated that the label did not significantly affect attitude scores. For the middle class sample, academic performance was a significant influence on expressed attitudes, with incompetent performance resulting in more negative evaluations. Academic performance did not affect attitude scores among the low SES sample. The data were interpreted as indicating that labels do not adversely influence the attitudes of peers toward labeled children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-273
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Mental Deficiency
Volume79
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1974

Fingerprint

Mentally Disabled Persons
Pupil
Mental Competency
Academic Performance
Labeling
Middle Class
Peers
Replication
Evaluation
Tape
Boys
Spelling
Datasets
Peer Influence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Attitudes toward retarded children : effects of labeling and academic performance. / Gottlieb, Jay.

In: American Journal of Mental Deficiency, Vol. 79, No. 3, 1974, p. 268-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b3375c26bdd4ec18230a82f57f8e98b,
title = "Attitudes toward retarded children: effects of labeling and academic performance",
abstract = "The influence of the label 'mentally retarded' on the attitudes of peers was investigated in 2 independent replications, one with a middle class sample, and the other with a low SES sample. 48 middle class and 40 low SES fourth graders were shown one of two video tapes of two children taking a spelling test. Half of the subjects saw the target actor as being a competent speller, while the remaining half saw him as an incompetent speller. Half of each group was told that the target actor was either a fifth grade pupil, or a mentally retarded boy in a special class. Data from the two sets of 2 x 2 (Label x Competence) replications, indicated that the label did not significantly affect attitude scores. For the middle class sample, academic performance was a significant influence on expressed attitudes, with incompetent performance resulting in more negative evaluations. Academic performance did not affect attitude scores among the low SES sample. The data were interpreted as indicating that labels do not adversely influence the attitudes of peers toward labeled children.",
author = "Jay Gottlieb",
year = "1974",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "268--273",
journal = "American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "1944-7515",
publisher = "American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes toward retarded children

T2 - effects of labeling and academic performance

AU - Gottlieb, Jay

PY - 1974

Y1 - 1974

N2 - The influence of the label 'mentally retarded' on the attitudes of peers was investigated in 2 independent replications, one with a middle class sample, and the other with a low SES sample. 48 middle class and 40 low SES fourth graders were shown one of two video tapes of two children taking a spelling test. Half of the subjects saw the target actor as being a competent speller, while the remaining half saw him as an incompetent speller. Half of each group was told that the target actor was either a fifth grade pupil, or a mentally retarded boy in a special class. Data from the two sets of 2 x 2 (Label x Competence) replications, indicated that the label did not significantly affect attitude scores. For the middle class sample, academic performance was a significant influence on expressed attitudes, with incompetent performance resulting in more negative evaluations. Academic performance did not affect attitude scores among the low SES sample. The data were interpreted as indicating that labels do not adversely influence the attitudes of peers toward labeled children.

AB - The influence of the label 'mentally retarded' on the attitudes of peers was investigated in 2 independent replications, one with a middle class sample, and the other with a low SES sample. 48 middle class and 40 low SES fourth graders were shown one of two video tapes of two children taking a spelling test. Half of the subjects saw the target actor as being a competent speller, while the remaining half saw him as an incompetent speller. Half of each group was told that the target actor was either a fifth grade pupil, or a mentally retarded boy in a special class. Data from the two sets of 2 x 2 (Label x Competence) replications, indicated that the label did not significantly affect attitude scores. For the middle class sample, academic performance was a significant influence on expressed attitudes, with incompetent performance resulting in more negative evaluations. Academic performance did not affect attitude scores among the low SES sample. The data were interpreted as indicating that labels do not adversely influence the attitudes of peers toward labeled children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016283515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016283515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 268

EP - 273

JO - American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

JF - American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

SN - 1944-7515

IS - 3

ER -