Attitudes toward mentally retarded persons: effects of attitude referent specificity

Jay Gottlieb, G. N. Siperstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The effects of the specificity of the attitude referent on female adults' expressed attitudes were studied. Specifically, attitudes toward a 'mentally retarded person' referent were compared with attitudes toward mentally retarded referents who were described in terms of their severity of retardation and CA. Results indicated that expressed attitudes toward a nondescript mentally retarded person referent were generally intermediate in favorability between mildly and severely retarded person referents. The response format of the attitude questionnaire (e.g., Likert, forced choice) was also found to affect attitude scores differentially as a function of the referent employed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-381
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Mental Deficiency
Volume80
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1976

Fingerprint

Mentally Disabled Persons
Referent
Specificity
Person

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Attitudes toward mentally retarded persons : effects of attitude referent specificity. / Gottlieb, Jay; Siperstein, G. N.

In: American Journal of Mental Deficiency, Vol. 80, No. 4, 1976, p. 376-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{868c4abb43234e2fb467cf79581b47b3,
title = "Attitudes toward mentally retarded persons: effects of attitude referent specificity",
abstract = "The effects of the specificity of the attitude referent on female adults' expressed attitudes were studied. Specifically, attitudes toward a 'mentally retarded person' referent were compared with attitudes toward mentally retarded referents who were described in terms of their severity of retardation and CA. Results indicated that expressed attitudes toward a nondescript mentally retarded person referent were generally intermediate in favorability between mildly and severely retarded person referents. The response format of the attitude questionnaire (e.g., Likert, forced choice) was also found to affect attitude scores differentially as a function of the referent employed.",
author = "Jay Gottlieb and Siperstein, {G. N.}",
year = "1976",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "376--381",
journal = "American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "1944-7515",
publisher = "American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes toward mentally retarded persons

T2 - effects of attitude referent specificity

AU - Gottlieb, Jay

AU - Siperstein, G. N.

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - The effects of the specificity of the attitude referent on female adults' expressed attitudes were studied. Specifically, attitudes toward a 'mentally retarded person' referent were compared with attitudes toward mentally retarded referents who were described in terms of their severity of retardation and CA. Results indicated that expressed attitudes toward a nondescript mentally retarded person referent were generally intermediate in favorability between mildly and severely retarded person referents. The response format of the attitude questionnaire (e.g., Likert, forced choice) was also found to affect attitude scores differentially as a function of the referent employed.

AB - The effects of the specificity of the attitude referent on female adults' expressed attitudes were studied. Specifically, attitudes toward a 'mentally retarded person' referent were compared with attitudes toward mentally retarded referents who were described in terms of their severity of retardation and CA. Results indicated that expressed attitudes toward a nondescript mentally retarded person referent were generally intermediate in favorability between mildly and severely retarded person referents. The response format of the attitude questionnaire (e.g., Likert, forced choice) was also found to affect attitude scores differentially as a function of the referent employed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017263224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017263224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 376

EP - 381

JO - American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

JF - American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

SN - 1944-7515

IS - 4

ER -