Attitudes and dating aggression

A cognitive dissonance approach

Julie A. Schumacher, Amy M Smith Slep

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined the association between attitudes about dating aggression and select dating aggressive behaviors (verbal aggression and jealous behavior) in high school students. Our hypothesis, derived from cognitive dissonance theory, was that discrepancies between self-reported attitudes and aggressive behavior at Time 1 (i.e., putative cognitive dissonance) would predict decreases in aggression between Time 1 and Time 2 beyond what would be predicted by change in attitudes over the same period. Results indicated that cognitive dissonance (as indexed by the discrepancy between attitudes and behavior) was generally a significant predictor of behavior change, providing significant improvement in prediction of behavior over attitude change alone. We discuss the implications of these findings for prevention efforts and directions for future research in this area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-243
Number of pages13
JournalPrevention Science
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

Cognitive Dissonance
Aggression
Verbal Behavior
Students

Keywords

  • attitudes
  • cognitive dissonance
  • dating violence
  • jealousy
  • verbal aggression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Attitudes and dating aggression : A cognitive dissonance approach. / Schumacher, Julie A.; Slep, Amy M Smith.

In: Prevention Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, 12.2004, p. 231-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{74134f02bd3249ef90e94d7a6457eb42,
title = "Attitudes and dating aggression: A cognitive dissonance approach",
abstract = "This study examined the association between attitudes about dating aggression and select dating aggressive behaviors (verbal aggression and jealous behavior) in high school students. Our hypothesis, derived from cognitive dissonance theory, was that discrepancies between self-reported attitudes and aggressive behavior at Time 1 (i.e., putative cognitive dissonance) would predict decreases in aggression between Time 1 and Time 2 beyond what would be predicted by change in attitudes over the same period. Results indicated that cognitive dissonance (as indexed by the discrepancy between attitudes and behavior) was generally a significant predictor of behavior change, providing significant improvement in prediction of behavior over attitude change alone. We discuss the implications of these findings for prevention efforts and directions for future research in this area.",
keywords = "attitudes, cognitive dissonance, dating violence, jealousy, verbal aggression",
author = "Schumacher, {Julie A.} and Slep, {Amy M Smith}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1023/B:PREV.0000045357.19100.77",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "231--243",
journal = "Prevention Science",
issn = "1389-4986",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes and dating aggression

T2 - A cognitive dissonance approach

AU - Schumacher, Julie A.

AU - Slep, Amy M Smith

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - This study examined the association between attitudes about dating aggression and select dating aggressive behaviors (verbal aggression and jealous behavior) in high school students. Our hypothesis, derived from cognitive dissonance theory, was that discrepancies between self-reported attitudes and aggressive behavior at Time 1 (i.e., putative cognitive dissonance) would predict decreases in aggression between Time 1 and Time 2 beyond what would be predicted by change in attitudes over the same period. Results indicated that cognitive dissonance (as indexed by the discrepancy between attitudes and behavior) was generally a significant predictor of behavior change, providing significant improvement in prediction of behavior over attitude change alone. We discuss the implications of these findings for prevention efforts and directions for future research in this area.

AB - This study examined the association between attitudes about dating aggression and select dating aggressive behaviors (verbal aggression and jealous behavior) in high school students. Our hypothesis, derived from cognitive dissonance theory, was that discrepancies between self-reported attitudes and aggressive behavior at Time 1 (i.e., putative cognitive dissonance) would predict decreases in aggression between Time 1 and Time 2 beyond what would be predicted by change in attitudes over the same period. Results indicated that cognitive dissonance (as indexed by the discrepancy between attitudes and behavior) was generally a significant predictor of behavior change, providing significant improvement in prediction of behavior over attitude change alone. We discuss the implications of these findings for prevention efforts and directions for future research in this area.

KW - attitudes

KW - cognitive dissonance

KW - dating violence

KW - jealousy

KW - verbal aggression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7044285780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7044285780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/B:PREV.0000045357.19100.77

DO - 10.1023/B:PREV.0000045357.19100.77

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 231

EP - 243

JO - Prevention Science

JF - Prevention Science

SN - 1389-4986

IS - 4

ER -