Attenuating the Escalation of Commitment to a Faltering Project in Decision-Making Groups: An Implementation Intention Approach

Frank Wieber, J. Lukas Thürmer, Peter Gollwitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When groups receive negative feedback on their progress toward a set goal, they often escalate rather than temper their commitment. To attenuate such escalation, we suggest initiating a self-distancing response (i.e., taking the perspective of a neutral observer) by forming implementation intentions when, where, and how to act (i.e., making if-then plans). Implementation intentions should help groups to translate a self-distancing intention into action. In line with this reasoning, only groups that had added implementation intentions to their goal to make optimal investment decisions reduced their high levels of investment (Study 1) or maintained their moderate levels of investment (Study 2) after negative feedback. Groups that had merely formed goal intentions, however, escalated even when their decision goal was supplemented with self-distancing instructions (Study 1), and they escalated as much as control groups without such a goal (Study 2). Implications for improving group decision making by implementation intentions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)587-595
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 5 2015

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Control Groups

Keywords

  • escalation of commitment
  • goals
  • group decision making
  • implementation intention
  • self-regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Attenuating the Escalation of Commitment to a Faltering Project in Decision-Making Groups : An Implementation Intention Approach. / Wieber, Frank; Thürmer, J. Lukas; Gollwitzer, Peter.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 6, No. 5, 05.07.2015, p. 587-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a602bd101d8406fb8b31e7c8490a7c5,
title = "Attenuating the Escalation of Commitment to a Faltering Project in Decision-Making Groups: An Implementation Intention Approach",
abstract = "When groups receive negative feedback on their progress toward a set goal, they often escalate rather than temper their commitment. To attenuate such escalation, we suggest initiating a self-distancing response (i.e., taking the perspective of a neutral observer) by forming implementation intentions when, where, and how to act (i.e., making if-then plans). Implementation intentions should help groups to translate a self-distancing intention into action. In line with this reasoning, only groups that had added implementation intentions to their goal to make optimal investment decisions reduced their high levels of investment (Study 1) or maintained their moderate levels of investment (Study 2) after negative feedback. Groups that had merely formed goal intentions, however, escalated even when their decision goal was supplemented with self-distancing instructions (Study 1), and they escalated as much as control groups without such a goal (Study 2). Implications for improving group decision making by implementation intentions are discussed.",
keywords = "escalation of commitment, goals, group decision making, implementation intention, self-regulation",
author = "Frank Wieber and Th{\"u}rmer, {J. Lukas} and Peter Gollwitzer",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1177/1948550614568158",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "587--595",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attenuating the Escalation of Commitment to a Faltering Project in Decision-Making Groups

T2 - An Implementation Intention Approach

AU - Wieber, Frank

AU - Thürmer, J. Lukas

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

PY - 2015/7/5

Y1 - 2015/7/5

N2 - When groups receive negative feedback on their progress toward a set goal, they often escalate rather than temper their commitment. To attenuate such escalation, we suggest initiating a self-distancing response (i.e., taking the perspective of a neutral observer) by forming implementation intentions when, where, and how to act (i.e., making if-then plans). Implementation intentions should help groups to translate a self-distancing intention into action. In line with this reasoning, only groups that had added implementation intentions to their goal to make optimal investment decisions reduced their high levels of investment (Study 1) or maintained their moderate levels of investment (Study 2) after negative feedback. Groups that had merely formed goal intentions, however, escalated even when their decision goal was supplemented with self-distancing instructions (Study 1), and they escalated as much as control groups without such a goal (Study 2). Implications for improving group decision making by implementation intentions are discussed.

AB - When groups receive negative feedback on their progress toward a set goal, they often escalate rather than temper their commitment. To attenuate such escalation, we suggest initiating a self-distancing response (i.e., taking the perspective of a neutral observer) by forming implementation intentions when, where, and how to act (i.e., making if-then plans). Implementation intentions should help groups to translate a self-distancing intention into action. In line with this reasoning, only groups that had added implementation intentions to their goal to make optimal investment decisions reduced their high levels of investment (Study 1) or maintained their moderate levels of investment (Study 2) after negative feedback. Groups that had merely formed goal intentions, however, escalated even when their decision goal was supplemented with self-distancing instructions (Study 1), and they escalated as much as control groups without such a goal (Study 2). Implications for improving group decision making by implementation intentions are discussed.

KW - escalation of commitment

KW - goals

KW - group decision making

KW - implementation intention

KW - self-regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930427260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930427260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1948550614568158

DO - 10.1177/1948550614568158

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 587

EP - 595

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 5

ER -