Attention and self in Buddhist philosophy of mind

Jonardon Ganeri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Buddhist philosophy of mind is fascinating because it denies that there is a self in one of the ways that has traditionally seemed best able to make sense of that idea: the idea that the self is the agent of actions including the thinking of thoughts. In the Buddhist philosophy of mind of the fifth century thinker Buddhaghosa what does the explanatory work is instead attention. Attention replaces self in the explanation of cognition’s grounding in perception and action; it does this because it performs two functions at once, a function of placing and a function of focussing. A comparison between the thought of Buddhaghosa and Brian O’Shaughnessy helps to clarify what is at stake in the residual employment of the concept self as a derived rather than a primitive notion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalRatio
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Buddhist philosophy
Philosophy of Mind
Grounding
Cognition
Thinkers
Thought

Keywords

  • attention
  • Buddhaghosa
  • Buddhist philosophy
  • O’Shaughnessy
  • self

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Attention and self in Buddhist philosophy of mind. / Ganeri, Jonardon.

In: Ratio, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7cdf31311bed4d7ab336534995b32b8d,
title = "Attention and self in Buddhist philosophy of mind",
abstract = "Buddhist philosophy of mind is fascinating because it denies that there is a self in one of the ways that has traditionally seemed best able to make sense of that idea: the idea that the self is the agent of actions including the thinking of thoughts. In the Buddhist philosophy of mind of the fifth century thinker Buddhaghosa what does the explanatory work is instead attention. Attention replaces self in the explanation of cognition’s grounding in perception and action; it does this because it performs two functions at once, a function of placing and a function of focussing. A comparison between the thought of Buddhaghosa and Brian O’Shaughnessy helps to clarify what is at stake in the residual employment of the concept self as a derived rather than a primitive notion.",
keywords = "attention, Buddhaghosa, Buddhist philosophy, O’Shaughnessy, self",
author = "Jonardon Ganeri",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rati.12202",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Ratio",
issn = "0034-0006",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention and self in Buddhist philosophy of mind

AU - Ganeri, Jonardon

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Buddhist philosophy of mind is fascinating because it denies that there is a self in one of the ways that has traditionally seemed best able to make sense of that idea: the idea that the self is the agent of actions including the thinking of thoughts. In the Buddhist philosophy of mind of the fifth century thinker Buddhaghosa what does the explanatory work is instead attention. Attention replaces self in the explanation of cognition’s grounding in perception and action; it does this because it performs two functions at once, a function of placing and a function of focussing. A comparison between the thought of Buddhaghosa and Brian O’Shaughnessy helps to clarify what is at stake in the residual employment of the concept self as a derived rather than a primitive notion.

AB - Buddhist philosophy of mind is fascinating because it denies that there is a self in one of the ways that has traditionally seemed best able to make sense of that idea: the idea that the self is the agent of actions including the thinking of thoughts. In the Buddhist philosophy of mind of the fifth century thinker Buddhaghosa what does the explanatory work is instead attention. Attention replaces self in the explanation of cognition’s grounding in perception and action; it does this because it performs two functions at once, a function of placing and a function of focussing. A comparison between the thought of Buddhaghosa and Brian O’Shaughnessy helps to clarify what is at stake in the residual employment of the concept self as a derived rather than a primitive notion.

KW - attention

KW - Buddhaghosa

KW - Buddhist philosophy

KW - O’Shaughnessy

KW - self

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052628995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052628995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/rati.12202

DO - 10.1111/rati.12202

M3 - Article

JO - Ratio

JF - Ratio

SN - 0034-0006

ER -