Attending to others' posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners' online "listening" and its relationship to speaking

Alyssa Wise, Simone Nicole Hausknecht, Yuting Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Theoretical models of collaborative learning through online discussions presuppose that students generally attend to others' posts. However, a succession of studies over the last decade has shown this assumption to be unwarranted. Instead, research indicates that learners attend to others' posts in diverse and particular ways-an activity we have conceptualized as online "listening." In this study, we take an important step forward in developing a robust theory of online listening by examining the relationship between how learners "listen" (access existing posts) and "speak" (contribute posts) in online discussions. Ten variables indexing four dimensions of students' listening (breadth, depth, temporal contiguity and revisitation) and five variables indexing three dimensions of students' speaking (discursiveness, depth of content and reflectivity) were calculated for 31 students participating in 6 week-long online discussions as part of an undergraduate educational psychology course. Multi-level mixed-model linear regressions indicated that responsiveness of students' posts was positively predicted by how often they revisited previously read peer posts, and negatively related to a greater number of posts in the discussion overall. The depth of posts' contents was predicted by the percentage of posts viewed that students actually read (as opposed to scanned). An exploratory follow-up analysis indicated that these listening-speaking relationships manifest differently over time for distinct subsets of learners (e.g., a decrease in variable pairs versus corresponding fluctuations around stable levels). Put together, results suggest that when students take the time to read and re-read their peers' posts there are related benefits in the quality of the posts they contribute.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-209
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

speaking
Students
student
indexing
educational psychology
linear model
Linear regression
fluctuation
regression
learning

Keywords

  • Asynchronous discussion groups
  • Computer mediated communication
  • Online learning
  • Student participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Cite this

Attending to others' posts in asynchronous discussions : Learners' online "listening" and its relationship to speaking. / Wise, Alyssa; Hausknecht, Simone Nicole; Zhao, Yuting.

In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2014, p. 185-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca73f602108b48f3a8dcda74ef45a172,
title = "Attending to others' posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners' online {"}listening{"} and its relationship to speaking",
abstract = "Theoretical models of collaborative learning through online discussions presuppose that students generally attend to others' posts. However, a succession of studies over the last decade has shown this assumption to be unwarranted. Instead, research indicates that learners attend to others' posts in diverse and particular ways-an activity we have conceptualized as online {"}listening.{"} In this study, we take an important step forward in developing a robust theory of online listening by examining the relationship between how learners {"}listen{"} (access existing posts) and {"}speak{"} (contribute posts) in online discussions. Ten variables indexing four dimensions of students' listening (breadth, depth, temporal contiguity and revisitation) and five variables indexing three dimensions of students' speaking (discursiveness, depth of content and reflectivity) were calculated for 31 students participating in 6 week-long online discussions as part of an undergraduate educational psychology course. Multi-level mixed-model linear regressions indicated that responsiveness of students' posts was positively predicted by how often they revisited previously read peer posts, and negatively related to a greater number of posts in the discussion overall. The depth of posts' contents was predicted by the percentage of posts viewed that students actually read (as opposed to scanned). An exploratory follow-up analysis indicated that these listening-speaking relationships manifest differently over time for distinct subsets of learners (e.g., a decrease in variable pairs versus corresponding fluctuations around stable levels). Put together, results suggest that when students take the time to read and re-read their peers' posts there are related benefits in the quality of the posts they contribute.",
keywords = "Asynchronous discussion groups, Computer mediated communication, Online learning, Student participation",
author = "Alyssa Wise and Hausknecht, {Simone Nicole} and Yuting Zhao",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11412-014-9192-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "185--209",
journal = "International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning",
issn = "1556-1607",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attending to others' posts in asynchronous discussions

T2 - Learners' online "listening" and its relationship to speaking

AU - Wise, Alyssa

AU - Hausknecht, Simone Nicole

AU - Zhao, Yuting

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Theoretical models of collaborative learning through online discussions presuppose that students generally attend to others' posts. However, a succession of studies over the last decade has shown this assumption to be unwarranted. Instead, research indicates that learners attend to others' posts in diverse and particular ways-an activity we have conceptualized as online "listening." In this study, we take an important step forward in developing a robust theory of online listening by examining the relationship between how learners "listen" (access existing posts) and "speak" (contribute posts) in online discussions. Ten variables indexing four dimensions of students' listening (breadth, depth, temporal contiguity and revisitation) and five variables indexing three dimensions of students' speaking (discursiveness, depth of content and reflectivity) were calculated for 31 students participating in 6 week-long online discussions as part of an undergraduate educational psychology course. Multi-level mixed-model linear regressions indicated that responsiveness of students' posts was positively predicted by how often they revisited previously read peer posts, and negatively related to a greater number of posts in the discussion overall. The depth of posts' contents was predicted by the percentage of posts viewed that students actually read (as opposed to scanned). An exploratory follow-up analysis indicated that these listening-speaking relationships manifest differently over time for distinct subsets of learners (e.g., a decrease in variable pairs versus corresponding fluctuations around stable levels). Put together, results suggest that when students take the time to read and re-read their peers' posts there are related benefits in the quality of the posts they contribute.

AB - Theoretical models of collaborative learning through online discussions presuppose that students generally attend to others' posts. However, a succession of studies over the last decade has shown this assumption to be unwarranted. Instead, research indicates that learners attend to others' posts in diverse and particular ways-an activity we have conceptualized as online "listening." In this study, we take an important step forward in developing a robust theory of online listening by examining the relationship between how learners "listen" (access existing posts) and "speak" (contribute posts) in online discussions. Ten variables indexing four dimensions of students' listening (breadth, depth, temporal contiguity and revisitation) and five variables indexing three dimensions of students' speaking (discursiveness, depth of content and reflectivity) were calculated for 31 students participating in 6 week-long online discussions as part of an undergraduate educational psychology course. Multi-level mixed-model linear regressions indicated that responsiveness of students' posts was positively predicted by how often they revisited previously read peer posts, and negatively related to a greater number of posts in the discussion overall. The depth of posts' contents was predicted by the percentage of posts viewed that students actually read (as opposed to scanned). An exploratory follow-up analysis indicated that these listening-speaking relationships manifest differently over time for distinct subsets of learners (e.g., a decrease in variable pairs versus corresponding fluctuations around stable levels). Put together, results suggest that when students take the time to read and re-read their peers' posts there are related benefits in the quality of the posts they contribute.

KW - Asynchronous discussion groups

KW - Computer mediated communication

KW - Online learning

KW - Student participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901823299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901823299&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11412-014-9192-9

DO - 10.1007/s11412-014-9192-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84901823299

VL - 9

SP - 185

EP - 209

JO - International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

JF - International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

SN - 1556-1607

IS - 2

ER -