Attachment and sibling rivalry in Little Hans: The fantasy of the two giraffes revisited

Jerome C. Wakefield

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Freud's interpretation of Little Hans's "phantasy of the two giraffes" (1909) is pivotal to his oedipal analysis that Hans has inchoate desires for sexual intercourse with his mother. Bowlby (1973) argued that Freud's focus on his oedipal theory led him to ignore preoedipal attachment-related factors that have equal plausibility in explaining the clinical data. However, Bowlby did not attempt to apply the attachment perspective to the interpretation of Hans's fantasies that form the core of the case material. A microanalysis of Hans's giraffe fantasy and the evidence used to support Freud's claims about it yields an attachment-based sibling rivalry account arguably of greater explanatory power than the oedipal account. Consistent with Bowlby's hypothesis, the evidence suggests that Hans's giraffe fantasy is about the sibling rivalry triangle involved in caregiver attachment access, rather than (or in addition to) the oedipal triangle. The issue of multiple levels of meaning and the methodological challenges raised by multiple determination is also considered. The giraffe fantasy's attachment-theoretic explanation encourages a rethinking of this classic case and strengthens Bowlby's claim that the case is fruitfully viewed from an attachment perspective.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)821-849
    Number of pages29
    JournalJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
    Volume55
    Issue number3
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

    Fingerprint

    Fantasy
    Siblings
    Coitus
    Caregivers
    Mothers
    Giraffes
    Rivalry
    Sigmund Freud

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
    • Clinical Psychology

    Cite this

    Attachment and sibling rivalry in Little Hans : The fantasy of the two giraffes revisited. / Wakefield, Jerome C.

    In: Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 55, No. 3, 01.06.2007, p. 821-849.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{77bd65094eb84f8eacaa4a1f2ba877b4,
    title = "Attachment and sibling rivalry in Little Hans: The fantasy of the two giraffes revisited",
    abstract = "Freud's interpretation of Little Hans's {"}phantasy of the two giraffes{"} (1909) is pivotal to his oedipal analysis that Hans has inchoate desires for sexual intercourse with his mother. Bowlby (1973) argued that Freud's focus on his oedipal theory led him to ignore preoedipal attachment-related factors that have equal plausibility in explaining the clinical data. However, Bowlby did not attempt to apply the attachment perspective to the interpretation of Hans's fantasies that form the core of the case material. A microanalysis of Hans's giraffe fantasy and the evidence used to support Freud's claims about it yields an attachment-based sibling rivalry account arguably of greater explanatory power than the oedipal account. Consistent with Bowlby's hypothesis, the evidence suggests that Hans's giraffe fantasy is about the sibling rivalry triangle involved in caregiver attachment access, rather than (or in addition to) the oedipal triangle. The issue of multiple levels of meaning and the methodological challenges raised by multiple determination is also considered. The giraffe fantasy's attachment-theoretic explanation encourages a rethinking of this classic case and strengthens Bowlby's claim that the case is fruitfully viewed from an attachment perspective.",
    author = "Wakefield, {Jerome C.}",
    year = "2007",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "55",
    pages = "821--849",
    journal = "Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association",
    issn = "0003-0651",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Attachment and sibling rivalry in Little Hans

    T2 - The fantasy of the two giraffes revisited

    AU - Wakefield, Jerome C.

    PY - 2007/6/1

    Y1 - 2007/6/1

    N2 - Freud's interpretation of Little Hans's "phantasy of the two giraffes" (1909) is pivotal to his oedipal analysis that Hans has inchoate desires for sexual intercourse with his mother. Bowlby (1973) argued that Freud's focus on his oedipal theory led him to ignore preoedipal attachment-related factors that have equal plausibility in explaining the clinical data. However, Bowlby did not attempt to apply the attachment perspective to the interpretation of Hans's fantasies that form the core of the case material. A microanalysis of Hans's giraffe fantasy and the evidence used to support Freud's claims about it yields an attachment-based sibling rivalry account arguably of greater explanatory power than the oedipal account. Consistent with Bowlby's hypothesis, the evidence suggests that Hans's giraffe fantasy is about the sibling rivalry triangle involved in caregiver attachment access, rather than (or in addition to) the oedipal triangle. The issue of multiple levels of meaning and the methodological challenges raised by multiple determination is also considered. The giraffe fantasy's attachment-theoretic explanation encourages a rethinking of this classic case and strengthens Bowlby's claim that the case is fruitfully viewed from an attachment perspective.

    AB - Freud's interpretation of Little Hans's "phantasy of the two giraffes" (1909) is pivotal to his oedipal analysis that Hans has inchoate desires for sexual intercourse with his mother. Bowlby (1973) argued that Freud's focus on his oedipal theory led him to ignore preoedipal attachment-related factors that have equal plausibility in explaining the clinical data. However, Bowlby did not attempt to apply the attachment perspective to the interpretation of Hans's fantasies that form the core of the case material. A microanalysis of Hans's giraffe fantasy and the evidence used to support Freud's claims about it yields an attachment-based sibling rivalry account arguably of greater explanatory power than the oedipal account. Consistent with Bowlby's hypothesis, the evidence suggests that Hans's giraffe fantasy is about the sibling rivalry triangle involved in caregiver attachment access, rather than (or in addition to) the oedipal triangle. The issue of multiple levels of meaning and the methodological challenges raised by multiple determination is also considered. The giraffe fantasy's attachment-theoretic explanation encourages a rethinking of this classic case and strengthens Bowlby's claim that the case is fruitfully viewed from an attachment perspective.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34648816707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34648816707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 55

    SP - 821

    EP - 849

    JO - Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

    JF - Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

    SN - 0003-0651

    IS - 3

    ER -