Asymmetries in the representation of categorical phonotactics

Gillian Gallagher

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    A comparison of speakers’ treatment of two categorically unattested phonotactic structures in Cochabamba Quechua reveals a stronger grammatical prohibition on roots with pairs of ejectives, *[k’ap’u], than on roots with a plain stop followed by an ejective, *[kap’u]. While the distribution of ejectives can be stated as a single restriction on ejectives preceded by stops (ejective or plain), *[−cont, −son][cg], speakers show evidence of having learned an additional constraint that penalizes cooccurring ejectives more harshly, *[cg][cg]. An inductive learning bias in favor of constraints with the algebraic structure of *[cg][cg] is hypothesized (Marcus 2001, Berent et al. 2002, Berent et al. 2012), allowing such constraints to be preferred by learners over constraints like *[−cont, −son][+cg], which penalize sequences of unrelated feature matrices.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)557-590
    Number of pages34
    JournalLanguage
    Volume92
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    asymmetry
    Ejectives
    Categorical
    Asymmetry
    Phonotactics
    trend
    learning
    evidence

    Keywords

    • Analytic bias
    • Learning
    • Obligatory contour principle
    • Phonetic grounding
    • Quechua

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Asymmetries in the representation of categorical phonotactics. / Gallagher, Gillian.

    In: Language, Vol. 92, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 557-590.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Gallagher, Gillian. / Asymmetries in the representation of categorical phonotactics. In: Language. 2016 ; Vol. 92, No. 3. pp. 557-590.
    @article{52a0812df3124549a38c47742cc626ca,
    title = "Asymmetries in the representation of categorical phonotactics",
    abstract = "A comparison of speakers’ treatment of two categorically unattested phonotactic structures in Cochabamba Quechua reveals a stronger grammatical prohibition on roots with pairs of ejectives, *[k’ap’u], than on roots with a plain stop followed by an ejective, *[kap’u]. While the distribution of ejectives can be stated as a single restriction on ejectives preceded by stops (ejective or plain), *[−cont, −son][cg], speakers show evidence of having learned an additional constraint that penalizes cooccurring ejectives more harshly, *[cg][cg]. An inductive learning bias in favor of constraints with the algebraic structure of *[cg][cg] is hypothesized (Marcus 2001, Berent et al. 2002, Berent et al. 2012), allowing such constraints to be preferred by learners over constraints like *[−cont, −son][+cg], which penalize sequences of unrelated feature matrices.",
    keywords = "Analytic bias, Learning, Obligatory contour principle, Phonetic grounding, Quechua",
    author = "Gillian Gallagher",
    year = "2016",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1353/lan.2016.0048",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "92",
    pages = "557--590",
    journal = "Language",
    issn = "0097-8507",
    publisher = "Linguistic Society of America",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Asymmetries in the representation of categorical phonotactics

    AU - Gallagher, Gillian

    PY - 2016/9/1

    Y1 - 2016/9/1

    N2 - A comparison of speakers’ treatment of two categorically unattested phonotactic structures in Cochabamba Quechua reveals a stronger grammatical prohibition on roots with pairs of ejectives, *[k’ap’u], than on roots with a plain stop followed by an ejective, *[kap’u]. While the distribution of ejectives can be stated as a single restriction on ejectives preceded by stops (ejective or plain), *[−cont, −son][cg], speakers show evidence of having learned an additional constraint that penalizes cooccurring ejectives more harshly, *[cg][cg]. An inductive learning bias in favor of constraints with the algebraic structure of *[cg][cg] is hypothesized (Marcus 2001, Berent et al. 2002, Berent et al. 2012), allowing such constraints to be preferred by learners over constraints like *[−cont, −son][+cg], which penalize sequences of unrelated feature matrices.

    AB - A comparison of speakers’ treatment of two categorically unattested phonotactic structures in Cochabamba Quechua reveals a stronger grammatical prohibition on roots with pairs of ejectives, *[k’ap’u], than on roots with a plain stop followed by an ejective, *[kap’u]. While the distribution of ejectives can be stated as a single restriction on ejectives preceded by stops (ejective or plain), *[−cont, −son][cg], speakers show evidence of having learned an additional constraint that penalizes cooccurring ejectives more harshly, *[cg][cg]. An inductive learning bias in favor of constraints with the algebraic structure of *[cg][cg] is hypothesized (Marcus 2001, Berent et al. 2002, Berent et al. 2012), allowing such constraints to be preferred by learners over constraints like *[−cont, −son][+cg], which penalize sequences of unrelated feature matrices.

    KW - Analytic bias

    KW - Learning

    KW - Obligatory contour principle

    KW - Phonetic grounding

    KW - Quechua

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988603510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988603510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1353/lan.2016.0048

    DO - 10.1353/lan.2016.0048

    M3 - Article

    VL - 92

    SP - 557

    EP - 590

    JO - Language

    JF - Language

    SN - 0097-8507

    IS - 3

    ER -