Astrometry.net

Blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images

Dustin Lang, David W. Hogg, Keir Mierle, Michael Blanton, Sam Roweis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We have built a reliable and robust system that takes as input an astronomical image, and returns as output the pointing, scale, and orientation of that image (the astrometric calibration or World Coordinate System information). The system requires no first guess, and works with the information in the image pixels alone; that is, the problem is a generalization of the "lost in space" problem in which nothing - not even the image scale - is known. After robust source detection is performed in the input image, asterisms (sets of four or five stars) are geometrically hashed and compared to pre-indexed hashes to generate hypotheses about the astrometric calibration. A hypothesis is only accepted as true if it passes a Bayesian decision theory test against a null hypothesis. With indices built from the USNO-B catalog and designed for uniformity of coverage and redundancy, the success rate is >99.9% for contemporary near-ultraviolet and visual imaging survey data, with no false positives. The failure rate is consistent with the incompleteness of the USNO-B catalog; augmentation with indices built from the Two Micron All Sky Survey catalog brings the completeness to 100% with no false positives. We are using this system to generate consistent and standards-compliant meta-data for digital and digitized imaging from plate repositories, automated observatories, individual scientific investigators, and hobbyists. This is the first step in a program of making it possible to trust calibration meta-data for astronomical data of arbitrary provenance.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1782-1800
    Number of pages19
    JournalAstronomical Journal
    Volume139
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    astrometry
    calibration
    catalogs
    metadata
    decision theory
    null hypothesis
    redundancy
    completeness
    repository
    provenance
    observatories
    pixel
    observatory
    pixels
    stars
    augmentation
    output

    Keywords

    • Astrometry
    • Catalogs
    • Instrumentation: miscellaneous
    • Methods: data analysis
    • Methods: statistical
    • Techniques: image processing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Space and Planetary Science
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics

    Cite this

    Astrometry.net : Blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images. / Lang, Dustin; Hogg, David W.; Mierle, Keir; Blanton, Michael; Roweis, Sam.

    In: Astronomical Journal, Vol. 139, No. 5, 2010, p. 1782-1800.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Lang, D, Hogg, DW, Mierle, K, Blanton, M & Roweis, S 2010, 'Astrometry.net: Blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images', Astronomical Journal, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 1782-1800. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782
    Lang, Dustin ; Hogg, David W. ; Mierle, Keir ; Blanton, Michael ; Roweis, Sam. / Astrometry.net : Blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images. In: Astronomical Journal. 2010 ; Vol. 139, No. 5. pp. 1782-1800.
    @article{9b5b9ca2c5ff40e3b1b4a685879934a0,
    title = "Astrometry.net: Blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images",
    abstract = "We have built a reliable and robust system that takes as input an astronomical image, and returns as output the pointing, scale, and orientation of that image (the astrometric calibration or World Coordinate System information). The system requires no first guess, and works with the information in the image pixels alone; that is, the problem is a generalization of the {"}lost in space{"} problem in which nothing - not even the image scale - is known. After robust source detection is performed in the input image, asterisms (sets of four or five stars) are geometrically hashed and compared to pre-indexed hashes to generate hypotheses about the astrometric calibration. A hypothesis is only accepted as true if it passes a Bayesian decision theory test against a null hypothesis. With indices built from the USNO-B catalog and designed for uniformity of coverage and redundancy, the success rate is >99.9{\%} for contemporary near-ultraviolet and visual imaging survey data, with no false positives. The failure rate is consistent with the incompleteness of the USNO-B catalog; augmentation with indices built from the Two Micron All Sky Survey catalog brings the completeness to 100{\%} with no false positives. We are using this system to generate consistent and standards-compliant meta-data for digital and digitized imaging from plate repositories, automated observatories, individual scientific investigators, and hobbyists. This is the first step in a program of making it possible to trust calibration meta-data for astronomical data of arbitrary provenance.",
    keywords = "Astrometry, Catalogs, Instrumentation: miscellaneous, Methods: data analysis, Methods: statistical, Techniques: image processing",
    author = "Dustin Lang and Hogg, {David W.} and Keir Mierle and Michael Blanton and Sam Roweis",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "139",
    pages = "1782--1800",
    journal = "Astronomical Journal",
    issn = "0004-6256",
    publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Astrometry.net

    T2 - Blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images

    AU - Lang, Dustin

    AU - Hogg, David W.

    AU - Mierle, Keir

    AU - Blanton, Michael

    AU - Roweis, Sam

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - We have built a reliable and robust system that takes as input an astronomical image, and returns as output the pointing, scale, and orientation of that image (the astrometric calibration or World Coordinate System information). The system requires no first guess, and works with the information in the image pixels alone; that is, the problem is a generalization of the "lost in space" problem in which nothing - not even the image scale - is known. After robust source detection is performed in the input image, asterisms (sets of four or five stars) are geometrically hashed and compared to pre-indexed hashes to generate hypotheses about the astrometric calibration. A hypothesis is only accepted as true if it passes a Bayesian decision theory test against a null hypothesis. With indices built from the USNO-B catalog and designed for uniformity of coverage and redundancy, the success rate is >99.9% for contemporary near-ultraviolet and visual imaging survey data, with no false positives. The failure rate is consistent with the incompleteness of the USNO-B catalog; augmentation with indices built from the Two Micron All Sky Survey catalog brings the completeness to 100% with no false positives. We are using this system to generate consistent and standards-compliant meta-data for digital and digitized imaging from plate repositories, automated observatories, individual scientific investigators, and hobbyists. This is the first step in a program of making it possible to trust calibration meta-data for astronomical data of arbitrary provenance.

    AB - We have built a reliable and robust system that takes as input an astronomical image, and returns as output the pointing, scale, and orientation of that image (the astrometric calibration or World Coordinate System information). The system requires no first guess, and works with the information in the image pixels alone; that is, the problem is a generalization of the "lost in space" problem in which nothing - not even the image scale - is known. After robust source detection is performed in the input image, asterisms (sets of four or five stars) are geometrically hashed and compared to pre-indexed hashes to generate hypotheses about the astrometric calibration. A hypothesis is only accepted as true if it passes a Bayesian decision theory test against a null hypothesis. With indices built from the USNO-B catalog and designed for uniformity of coverage and redundancy, the success rate is >99.9% for contemporary near-ultraviolet and visual imaging survey data, with no false positives. The failure rate is consistent with the incompleteness of the USNO-B catalog; augmentation with indices built from the Two Micron All Sky Survey catalog brings the completeness to 100% with no false positives. We are using this system to generate consistent and standards-compliant meta-data for digital and digitized imaging from plate repositories, automated observatories, individual scientific investigators, and hobbyists. This is the first step in a program of making it possible to trust calibration meta-data for astronomical data of arbitrary provenance.

    KW - Astrometry

    KW - Catalogs

    KW - Instrumentation: miscellaneous

    KW - Methods: data analysis

    KW - Methods: statistical

    KW - Techniques: image processing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950969271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950969271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782

    DO - 10.1088/0004-6256/139/5/1782

    M3 - Article

    VL - 139

    SP - 1782

    EP - 1800

    JO - Astronomical Journal

    JF - Astronomical Journal

    SN - 0004-6256

    IS - 5

    ER -