Association of State-Level Restrictions in Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice With the Quality of Primary Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries

Jennifer Perloff, Sean Clarke, Catherine M. DesRoches, Monica O’Reilly-Jacob, Peter Buerhaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: State scope of practice (SoP) laws impose significant restrictions on the services that a nurse practitioner (NP) may provide in some states, yet evidence about SoP limitations on the quality of primary care is very limited. Method: This study uses six different classifications of state regulations and bivariate and multivariate analyses to compare beneficiaries attributed to primary care nurse practitioners and primary care physicians in 2013 testing two hypotheses: (1) chronic disease management, cancer screening, preventable hospitalizations, and adverse outcomes of care provided by primary care nurse practitioners are better in reduced and restricted practice states compared to states without restrictions and (2) by decreasing access to care, SoP restrictions negatively affect the quality of primary care. Findings: Results show a lack of consistent association between quality of primary care provided by NPs and state SoP restrictions. Conclusion: State regulations restricting NP SoP do not improve the quality of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical Care Research and Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Nurse Practitioners
Quality of Health Care
Medicare
Primary Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Disease Management
Early Detection of Cancer
Hospitalization
Chronic Disease
Multivariate Analysis

Keywords

  • Medicare
  • primary care
  • quality
  • scope of practice
  • workforce

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Association of State-Level Restrictions in Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice With the Quality of Primary Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries. / Perloff, Jennifer; Clarke, Sean; DesRoches, Catherine M.; O’Reilly-Jacob, Monica; Buerhaus, Peter.

In: Medical Care Research and Review, 01.09.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64fc3331056243a0b09590f164d5b15d,
title = "Association of State-Level Restrictions in Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice With the Quality of Primary Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries",
abstract = "Context: State scope of practice (SoP) laws impose significant restrictions on the services that a nurse practitioner (NP) may provide in some states, yet evidence about SoP limitations on the quality of primary care is very limited. Method: This study uses six different classifications of state regulations and bivariate and multivariate analyses to compare beneficiaries attributed to primary care nurse practitioners and primary care physicians in 2013 testing two hypotheses: (1) chronic disease management, cancer screening, preventable hospitalizations, and adverse outcomes of care provided by primary care nurse practitioners are better in reduced and restricted practice states compared to states without restrictions and (2) by decreasing access to care, SoP restrictions negatively affect the quality of primary care. Findings: Results show a lack of consistent association between quality of primary care provided by NPs and state SoP restrictions. Conclusion: State regulations restricting NP SoP do not improve the quality of care.",
keywords = "Medicare, primary care, quality, scope of practice, workforce",
author = "Jennifer Perloff and Sean Clarke and DesRoches, {Catherine M.} and Monica O’Reilly-Jacob and Peter Buerhaus",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077558717732402",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Medical Care Research and Review",
issn = "1077-5587",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of State-Level Restrictions in Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice With the Quality of Primary Care Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries

AU - Perloff, Jennifer

AU - Clarke, Sean

AU - DesRoches, Catherine M.

AU - O’Reilly-Jacob, Monica

AU - Buerhaus, Peter

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Context: State scope of practice (SoP) laws impose significant restrictions on the services that a nurse practitioner (NP) may provide in some states, yet evidence about SoP limitations on the quality of primary care is very limited. Method: This study uses six different classifications of state regulations and bivariate and multivariate analyses to compare beneficiaries attributed to primary care nurse practitioners and primary care physicians in 2013 testing two hypotheses: (1) chronic disease management, cancer screening, preventable hospitalizations, and adverse outcomes of care provided by primary care nurse practitioners are better in reduced and restricted practice states compared to states without restrictions and (2) by decreasing access to care, SoP restrictions negatively affect the quality of primary care. Findings: Results show a lack of consistent association between quality of primary care provided by NPs and state SoP restrictions. Conclusion: State regulations restricting NP SoP do not improve the quality of care.

AB - Context: State scope of practice (SoP) laws impose significant restrictions on the services that a nurse practitioner (NP) may provide in some states, yet evidence about SoP limitations on the quality of primary care is very limited. Method: This study uses six different classifications of state regulations and bivariate and multivariate analyses to compare beneficiaries attributed to primary care nurse practitioners and primary care physicians in 2013 testing two hypotheses: (1) chronic disease management, cancer screening, preventable hospitalizations, and adverse outcomes of care provided by primary care nurse practitioners are better in reduced and restricted practice states compared to states without restrictions and (2) by decreasing access to care, SoP restrictions negatively affect the quality of primary care. Findings: Results show a lack of consistent association between quality of primary care provided by NPs and state SoP restrictions. Conclusion: State regulations restricting NP SoP do not improve the quality of care.

KW - Medicare

KW - primary care

KW - quality

KW - scope of practice

KW - workforce

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042384185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042384185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077558717732402

DO - 10.1177/1077558717732402

M3 - Article

C2 - 28906171

AN - SCOPUS:85042384185

JO - Medical Care Research and Review

JF - Medical Care Research and Review

SN - 1077-5587

ER -