Assessment of errors introduced by common assumptions made in power system studies

Jaime Peralta, Francisco De Leon, Jean Mahseredjian

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Power system studies using commercial or in-house developed software are performed making several assumptions. This paper analyzes the errors introduced by the most common modeling simplifications made for load-flow, short-circuit, and transient stability studies. Load-flow studies for transmission systems almost invariably rely on the positive-sequence approach. While this may be acceptable for most transmission system conditions, errors of up to 15% can be found by not considering the unbalanced nature of power systems components. Errors larger than 10% are found in short-circuit studies by using symmetrical components. Common assumptions also introduce differences in transient stability analysis. The results for the studied test case show differences of up to 14% in the determination of the maximum clearing time. With the current development status of computing hardware and available algorithms, more accurate modeling is currently available even for large systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Event2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future - Detroit, MI, United States
Duration: Jul 24 2011Jul 28 2011

Other

Other2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future
CountryUnited States
CityDetroit, MI
Period7/24/117/28/11

Fingerprint

Short circuit currents
Hardware

Keywords

  • Electromagnetic Couplings
  • Multiphase Systems
  • Positive-Sequence
  • Short-Circuit
  • Transient stability
  • Transmission and Distribution Networks
  • Unbalanced Load-Flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Peralta, J., De Leon, F., & Mahseredjian, J. (2011). Assessment of errors introduced by common assumptions made in power system studies. In 2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future [6038966] https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2011.6038966

Assessment of errors introduced by common assumptions made in power system studies. / Peralta, Jaime; De Leon, Francisco; Mahseredjian, Jean.

2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future. 2011. 6038966.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Peralta, J, De Leon, F & Mahseredjian, J 2011, Assessment of errors introduced by common assumptions made in power system studies. in 2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future., 6038966, 2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future, Detroit, MI, United States, 7/24/11. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2011.6038966
Peralta J, De Leon F, Mahseredjian J. Assessment of errors introduced by common assumptions made in power system studies. In 2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future. 2011. 6038966 https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2011.6038966
Peralta, Jaime ; De Leon, Francisco ; Mahseredjian, Jean. / Assessment of errors introduced by common assumptions made in power system studies. 2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future. 2011.
@inproceedings{d6d1f9fa9c894e62bfe59a9c69dfc61a,
title = "Assessment of errors introduced by common assumptions made in power system studies",
abstract = "Power system studies using commercial or in-house developed software are performed making several assumptions. This paper analyzes the errors introduced by the most common modeling simplifications made for load-flow, short-circuit, and transient stability studies. Load-flow studies for transmission systems almost invariably rely on the positive-sequence approach. While this may be acceptable for most transmission system conditions, errors of up to 15{\%} can be found by not considering the unbalanced nature of power systems components. Errors larger than 10{\%} are found in short-circuit studies by using symmetrical components. Common assumptions also introduce differences in transient stability analysis. The results for the studied test case show differences of up to 14{\%} in the determination of the maximum clearing time. With the current development status of computing hardware and available algorithms, more accurate modeling is currently available even for large systems.",
keywords = "Electromagnetic Couplings, Multiphase Systems, Positive-Sequence, Short-Circuit, Transient stability, Transmission and Distribution Networks, Unbalanced Load-Flow",
author = "Jaime Peralta and {De Leon}, Francisco and Jean Mahseredjian",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1109/PES.2011.6038966",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781457710018",
booktitle = "2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Assessment of errors introduced by common assumptions made in power system studies

AU - Peralta, Jaime

AU - De Leon, Francisco

AU - Mahseredjian, Jean

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Power system studies using commercial or in-house developed software are performed making several assumptions. This paper analyzes the errors introduced by the most common modeling simplifications made for load-flow, short-circuit, and transient stability studies. Load-flow studies for transmission systems almost invariably rely on the positive-sequence approach. While this may be acceptable for most transmission system conditions, errors of up to 15% can be found by not considering the unbalanced nature of power systems components. Errors larger than 10% are found in short-circuit studies by using symmetrical components. Common assumptions also introduce differences in transient stability analysis. The results for the studied test case show differences of up to 14% in the determination of the maximum clearing time. With the current development status of computing hardware and available algorithms, more accurate modeling is currently available even for large systems.

AB - Power system studies using commercial or in-house developed software are performed making several assumptions. This paper analyzes the errors introduced by the most common modeling simplifications made for load-flow, short-circuit, and transient stability studies. Load-flow studies for transmission systems almost invariably rely on the positive-sequence approach. While this may be acceptable for most transmission system conditions, errors of up to 15% can be found by not considering the unbalanced nature of power systems components. Errors larger than 10% are found in short-circuit studies by using symmetrical components. Common assumptions also introduce differences in transient stability analysis. The results for the studied test case show differences of up to 14% in the determination of the maximum clearing time. With the current development status of computing hardware and available algorithms, more accurate modeling is currently available even for large systems.

KW - Electromagnetic Couplings

KW - Multiphase Systems

KW - Positive-Sequence

KW - Short-Circuit

KW - Transient stability

KW - Transmission and Distribution Networks

KW - Unbalanced Load-Flow

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82855163901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82855163901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/PES.2011.6038966

DO - 10.1109/PES.2011.6038966

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781457710018

BT - 2011 IEEE PES General Meeting: The Electrification of Transportation and the Grid of the Future

ER -